Knowledge on Stage: Scientific Policy Advice

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 812-838

  Kropp, Cordula ^a   Wagner, Jost ^b  

^a University of Applied Science   (Germany)

^b GAB München Gesellschaft für Ausbildungsforschung und Berufsentwicklung   (Germany)

Author keywords

dialogue; expertise; knowledge; policy process; scientific policy advice

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957257573     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: 15528251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0162243909357912     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barry, Andrew. 2001. Political machines: Governing a Technological Society. London: The Athlone Press.
2. Beck, Ulrich. 1995. Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
3. Beck, Ulrich, and Wolfgang Bonss. 1984. Soziologie und Modernisierung - Zur Ortsbestimmung der Verwendungsforschung [Sociology and Modernisation: Positionning the Research about the application of scientific reasoning]. Social World, 35 (4): 381-406.
4. Beck, Ulrich and Lau, Christoph. 2005. Second modernity as a research agenda: theoretical and empirical explorations in the 'meta-change' of modern society. British Journal of Sociology, 56 (4): 525-557.
5. Boehmer-Christiansen, Sonja. 1995. Reflections on scientific advice and EC trans-boundary pollution policy. Science and Public Policy, 22 (3): 195-204.
6. Bogner, Alexander, and Wolfgang Menz. 2002. Das theoriegenerierende Experteninterview. Erkenntnisinteresse, Wissensformen, Interaktion [Expert interviews in grouded theory: Cognitive interest, mode of knowledge, interaction]. In Das Experteninterview. Theorie, Methoden, Anwendungen, [Expert Interviews, Theory, Methods, Applications], ed. Alexander Bogner, Beate Littig and Wolfgang Menz, 33-70. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
7. Collins, Harry M. and Robert Evans, 2007. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago. The University of Chicago Press.
8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) 2005. Future Perspectives of Agricultural Science and Research (Memorandum). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
9. European Commission (2007): Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate. Directorate-General for Research, European Commission.
10. Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Haas, Peter M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. In International Organization, 46 (1): 1-35.
12. Haas, Peter. 2004. When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 11 (4): 569-592.
13. Heinrichs, Harald. 2002. Politikberatung in der Wissensgesellschaft: eine Analyse umweltpolitischer Beratungssysteme [Policy advice in the knowledge society: Analyzing systems of environmental policy consulting], Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
14. Henrichsmeyer, Wilhelm, and Heinz-Peter Witzke. 1991. Agrarpolitik, Band 1: Agrarökonomische Grundlagen [Agricultural policy: Basics in agronomy]. Stuttgart: UTB-Ulmer.
15. Hitzler, Ronald. 1994. Wissen und Wesen der Experten. Ein Annäherungsversuch - zur Einleitung [Knowledge and constitution of experts: An essay of approximination - introduction]. In Expertenwissen. Die institutionalisierte Kompetenz zur Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit [Expert knowledge: An institutionalized authority to construct reality], ed. Ronald Hitzler, Anne Honer, and Christian Maeder, 13-30. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
16. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1990. The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Jasanoff, Sheila and Brian Wynne, 1998: Science and Decisionmaking. In: Rayner, Steve and Elizabeth Malone (ed.): Human Choice and Climate Change. Vol.1: The societal framework. 1-87. Columbus: Battelle Press.
18. Kropp, Cordula, Frank Schiller, and Jost Wagner, eds. 2007. Die Zukunft der Wissenskommunikation. Perspektiven für einen reflexiven Dialog von Wissenschaft und Politik - am Beispiel des Agrarbereichs [The future of science communication. Perspectives towards a reflexive dialogue of science and politics - using the example of agricultural decision-making], Berlin: Edition Sigma.
19. Kropp, Cordula, and Jost Wagner. 2005. "Agrarwende": Über den institutionellen Umgang mit den Folgeproblemen der Folgenreflexion im Agrarbereich ["Turnaround in Agriculture": About institutional modes of dealing with side-effects of risk discourses in the agricultural field]. Social World, 56 (2): 159-182.
20. Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, Mass./London 1990: Harvard University Press.
21. Maasen, Sabine and Peter Weingart, 2005. Democratization of expertise?: exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making, Dodrecht: Springer.
22. Mante, Juliane. 2007. Wandel im Selbstverständnis der Agrarforschung? [Change in the self-conceptions of agronomy?] In Die Zukunft der Wissenskommunikation. Perspektiven für einen reflexiven Dialog von Wissenschaft und Politik - am Beispiel des Agrarbereiches [The future of science communication: Perspectives towards a reflexive dialogue of science and politics - using the example of agricultural decision-making], ed. Cordula Kropp, Frank Schiller, and Jost Wagner, 179-200. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
23. Martinsen, Renate, and Dieter Rehfeld. 2006. Politikberatung aus politikwissenschaftlicher Perspektive. Von der Aufklärung über Defizite zur reflexiven Aufklärung? [Policy advice from the outlook of political science: From enlightenment about deficits towards reflexive enlightenment?] In Handbook of Policy Advice, ed. Svenja Falk, Andrea Römmele, Dieter Rehfeld, and Martin Thunert, 45-58. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
24. May, Judith and Aaaron B. Wildavsky (ed.) 1979: The Policy Cycle. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
25. Nowotny, Helga. 2005a. Unersättliche Neugier. Innovationen in einer fragilen Zukunft Insatiable curiosity: [Innovations in a fragil future], Berlin: Kadmos.
26. Nowotny, Helga. 2005b. Experten, Expertisen und imaginierte Laien [Experts, expertise and imagined lay-people]. In Wozu Experten? Ambivalenzen der Beziehung von Wissenschaft und Politik [What's the use of experts: Ambivalences in the relation of science and politics], ed. Alexander Bogner and Helge Torgersen, 33-44. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
27. Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28. Pielke, Roger A. Jr. 2007. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Ravetz, Jerome R. 1987. Usable knowledge, usable ignorance: incomplete science with policy implications. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 9 (1): 87-116.
30. Rebe, Bernd. 2006. Politikberatung aus juristischer Sicht - Zugleich ein wissenschaftskritischer Beitrag zu einigen Voraussetzungen erfolgreicher Beratungsdiskurse [Policy advice from a judicial outlook - and a critical comment about prerequisites of successful consulting]. In Handbook of Policy Advice, ed. Svenja Falk, Andrea Römmele, Dieter Rehfeld, and Martin Thunert, 96-105. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
31. Renn, Ortwin. 2006: Participatory processes for designing environmental policies. Land Use Policy, 23 (1): 34-43.
32. Renn, Ortwin. 2007. Dialogische Formen der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung [Dialogue-oriented modes of policy advice]. In Die Zukunft der Wissenskommunikation. Perspektiven für einen reflexiven Dialog von Wissenschaft und Politik - am Beispiel des Agrarbereiche [The future of science communication. Perspectives towards a reflexive dialogue of science and politics - using the example of agricultural decision-making], ed. Cordula Kropp, Frank Schiller, and Jost Wagner, 161-178. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
33. Sabatier, Paul A. 1993. Policy change and learning. An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder/San Francisco/ Oxford: Westview Press.
34. Star, Susan Leigh. 1991. Power, technologies and the phenomenology of conventions: on being allergic to onions. A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. ed. John Law, 26-56. London and New York: Routledge.
35. van den Daele, Wolfgang. 1996. Objektives Wissen als politische Ressource: Experten und Gegenexperten im Diskurs [Impartial knowledge as political resource: Experts and contrary experts in political discourse]. In Kommunikation und Entscheidung. Politische Funktionen öffentlicher Meinungsbildung und diskursiver Verfahren [Communication and decision. Political functions, public opinion making and discoursive procedures], ed. Wolfgang van den Daele and Fried-helm Neidhardt, 297-326. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
36. Wagner, Jost, and Cordula Kropp. 2007. Dimensionen einer dialogisch-reflexiven Wissenserzeugung und -kommunikation im Agrarbereich [Dimensions of reflexive and dialogue-oriented modes of knowledge production and transfer in the agricultural field]. In: Die Zukunft der Wissenskommunikation. Perspektiven für einen reflexiven Dialog von Wissenschaft und Politik - am Beispiel des Agrarbereiches [The future of science communication. Perspectives towards a reflexive dialogue of science and politics - using the example of agricultural decision-making, ed]. Cordula Kropp, Frank Schiller, and Jost Wagner, 79-102. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
37. Weinberg, Alvin M. 1972. Science and trans-science. Minerva, 10 (1972): 209-222.
38. Weingart, Peter. 2001. Die Stunde der Wahrheit? Vom Verhältnis der Wissenschaft zu Politik, Wirtschaft und Medien in der Wissensgesellschaft [The hour of trust: Science in relation with politics, economy and media in the knowledge society], Weilerswist: Velbrück.