메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 774-778

Patient satisfaction with chest pain unit care: Findings from the Effectiveness and Safety of Chest Pain Assessment to Prevent Emergency Admissions (ESCAPE) cluster randomised trial

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMERGENCY CARE; EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; HOSPITAL; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; THORAX PAIN;

EID: 77957191671     PISSN: 14720205     EISSN: 14720213     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/emj.2009.086298     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (11)

References (19)
  • 1
    • 12744279568 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The health care burden of acute chest pain
    • scientific letter
    • Goodacre S, Cross E, Arnold J, et al. The health care burden of acute chest pain (scientific letter). Heart 2005;91:229-30.
    • (2005) Heart , vol.91 , pp. 229-230
    • Goodacre, S.1    Cross, E.2    Arnold, J.3
  • 2
    • 10744232654 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain observation unit versus routine care
    • Goodacre S, Nicholl J, Dixon S, et al. Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain observation unit versus routine care. BMJ 2004;328:254.
    • (2004) BMJ , vol.328 , pp. 254
    • Goodacre, S.1    Nicholl, J.2    Dixon, S.3
  • 3
    • 34447125011 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Structure process and outcomes of chest pain units established in the ESCAPE trial
    • ESCAPE research team.
    • Arnold J, Goodacre S, Morris F; ESCAPE research team. Structure process and outcomes of chest pain units established in the ESCAPE trial. Emerg Med J 2007;24:462-6.
    • (2007) Emerg Med J , vol.24 , pp. 462-466
    • Arnold, J.1    Goodacre, S.2    Morris, F.3
  • 4
    • 35148818363 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effectiveness and safety of chest pain assessment to prevent emergency admission: ESCAPE cluster randomised trial
    • Goodacre S, Cross E, Lewis C, et al. Effectiveness and safety of chest pain assessment to prevent emergency admission: ESCAPE cluster randomised trial. BMJ 2007;335:659.
    • (2007) BMJ , vol.335 , pp. 659
    • Goodacre, S.1    Cross, E.2    Lewis, C.3
  • 5
    • 57649208476 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patients' opinions of acute chest pain care: A qualitative evaluation of chest pain units
    • Johnson M, Goodacre S, Tod A, et al. Patients' opinions of acute chest pain care: a qualitative evaluation of chest pain units. J Adv Nurs 2008;65:120-9.
    • (2008) J Adv Nurs , vol.65 , pp. 120-129
    • Johnson, M.1    Goodacre, S.2    Tod, A.3
  • 6
    • 50849114487 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cost effectiveness of chest pain unit care in the NHS
    • Oluboyede Y, Goodacre S, Wailoo A, et al. Cost effectiveness of chest pain unit care in the NHS. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:174.
    • (2008) BMC Health Serv Res , vol.8 , pp. 174
    • Oluboyede, Y.1    Goodacre, S.2    Wailoo, A.3
  • 7
    • 0037143052 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chest pain units
    • Clancy M. Chest pain units. BMJ 2002;325:116-17.
    • (2002) BMJ , vol.325 , pp. 116-117
    • Clancy, M.1
  • 8
    • 0034020229 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Should we establish chest pain observation units in the United Kingdom? A systematic review and critical appraisal of the literature
    • Goodacre SW. Should we establish chest pain observation units in the United Kingdom? A systematic review and critical appraisal of the literature. J Accid Emerg Med 2000;17:1-6.
    • (2000) J Accid Emerg Med , vol.17 , pp. 1-6
    • Goodacre, S.W.1
  • 9
    • 0031013724 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patient satisfaction with an emergency department chest pain observation unit
    • Rydman RJ, Zalenski RJ, Roberts RR, et al. Patient satisfaction with an emergency department chest pain observation unit. Ann Emerg Med 1997;29:109-15.
    • (1997) Ann Emerg Med , vol.29 , pp. 109-115
    • Rydman, R.J.1    Zalenski, R.J.2    Roberts, R.R.3
  • 10
    • 0035908711 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is it possible to exclude a diagnosis of myocardial damage within six hours of admission to an emergency department? Diagnostic cohort study
    • Herren KR, Mackway-Jones K, Richards CR, et al. Is it possible to exclude a diagnosis of myocardial damage within six hours of admission to an emergency department? Diagnostic cohort study. BMJ 2001;323:372-4. (Pubitemid 32762461)
    • (2001) British Medical Journal , vol.323 , Issue.7309 , pp. 372-374
    • Herren, K.R.1    Mackway-Jones, K.2    Richards, C.R.3    Seneviratne, C.J.4    France, M.W.5    Cotter, L.6
  • 11
    • 0036714884 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ROMEO: A rapid rule out strategy for low risk chest pain. Does it work in a UK emergency department?
    • Taylor C, Forrest-Hay A, Meek S. ROMEO: a rapid rule out strategy for low risk chest pain. Does it work in a UK emergency department? Emerg Med J 2002;19:395-9.
    • (2002) Emerg Med J , vol.19 , pp. 395-399
    • Taylor, C.1    Forrest-Hay, A.2    Meek, S.3
  • 13
    • 0036206006 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Emergency management of chest pain: Patient satisfaction with an emergency department based six hour rule out myocardial infarction protocol
    • Richards CR, Richell-Herren K, Mackway-Jones K. Emergency management of chest pain: patient satisfaction with an emergency department based six hour rule out myocardial infarction protocol. EMJ 2002;19:122-5. (Pubitemid 34279610)
    • (2002) Emergency Medicine Journal , vol.19 , Issue.2 , pp. 122-125
    • Richards, C.R.1    Richell-Herren, K.2    Mackway-Jones, K.3
  • 16
    • 0034765732 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Impact of reminders and method of questionnaire distribution on patient response to mail-back satisfaction survey
    • DOI 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00387-0, PII S0895435601003870
    • Gasquet I, Falissard B, Ravaud P. Impact of reminders and method of questionnaire distribution on patient response to mail-back satisfaction survey. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:1174-80. (Pubitemid 33033248)
    • (2001) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.54 , Issue.11 , pp. 1174-1180
    • Gasquet, I.1    Falissard, B.2    Ravaud, P.3
  • 17
    • 0037547090 scopus 로고
    • Patient judgments of hospital quality. Response to questionnaire
    • Nelson EC, Rubin HR, Hays RD, et al. Patient judgments of hospital quality. Response to questionnaire. Med Care 1990;28:S18-22.
    • (1990) Med Care , vol.28
    • Nelson, E.C.1    Rubin, H.R.2    Hays, R.D.3
  • 18
    • 0029816129 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Can different patient satisfaction survey methods yield consistent results? Comparison of three surveys
    • Cohen G, Forbes J, Garraway M. Can different patient satisfaction survey methods yield consistent results? comparison of three surveys. BMJ 1996;313:841-4. (Pubitemid 26335205)
    • (1996) British Medical Journal , vol.313 , Issue.7061 , pp. 841-844
    • Cohen, G.1    Forbes, J.2    Garraway, M.3
  • 19
    • 0030640948 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences. A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys
    • Harris LE, Weinberger M, Tierney WM. Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences. A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys. Med Care 1997;31:70-6.
    • (1997) Med Care , vol.31 , pp. 70-76
    • Harris, L.E.1    Weinberger, M.2    Tierney, W.M.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.