Pollinator-mediated selection on floral display, spur length and flowering phenology in the deceptive orchid Dactylorhiza lapponica

New Phytologist

Volumn 188, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 385-392

  Sletvold, Nina ^a   Grindeland, John M ^a   Ågren, Jon ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Deceptive orchids; Female fitness; Floral evolution; Natural selection; Plant animal interactions; Pollen limitation; Pollinator mediated selection; Selection gradients

Indexed keywords

DISPLAY BEHAVIOR; FITNESS; FLORAL TRAIT; FLOWERING; HERB; HERBIVORE; MORPHOLOGY; NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOLOGY; PLANT-INSECT INTERACTION; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POLLEN LIMITATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEE; FLOWER; GENETIC SELECTION; HISTOLOGY; NORWAY; ORCHIDACEAE; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT;

ANIMALS; BEES; FLOWERS; NORWAY; ORCHIDACEAE; PHENOTYPE; POLLINATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

ANIMALIA; DACTYLORHIZA LAPPONICA; HEXAPODA; ORCHIDACEAE;

EID: 77957156515     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03296.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aizen MA, Harder LD. Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality. Ecology 2007, 88:271-281.
2. Alexandersson R, Ågren J. Population size, pollinator visitation and fruit production in the deceptive orchid Calypso bulbosa. Oecologia 1996, 107:533-540.
3. Armbruster WS. Exaptations link evolution of plant-herbivore and plant-pollinator interactions: a phylogenetic inquiry. Ecology 1997, 78:1661-1672.
4. Ashman T-L, Knight TM, Steets JA, Amarasekare P, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Mazer SJ, Mitchell RJ. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 2004, 85:2408-2421.
5. Ashman T-L, Morgan MT. Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context? Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2004, 271:553-559.
6. Biernaskie JM, Walker SC, Gegear RJ. Bumblebees learn to forage like Bayesians. American Naturalist 2009, 174:413-423.
7. Cook RD. Added-variable plots and curvature in linear regression. Technometrics 1996, 38:275-278.
8. Cozzolino S, Widmer A. Orchid diversity: an evolutionary consequence of deception? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2005, 20:487-494.
9. Dafni A. Mimicry and deception in pollination. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1984, 15:259-278.
10. Darwin CR. On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects 1862, London, UK, Murray
11. Delforge P, Harrap S. Orchids of Europe, North Africa and the Middle East 2006, London, UK, A&C Black
12. Elzinga JA, Atlan A, Biere A, Gigord L, Weis AE, Bernasconi G. Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2007, 22:432-439.
13. Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 2004, 35:375-403.
14. Ferdy JB, Gouyon PH, Moret J, Godelle B. Pollinator behaviour and deceptive pollination: learning process and floral evolution. American Naturalist 1998, 152:696-705.
15. Fishman L, Willis JH. Pollen limitation and natural selection on floral characters in the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. New Phytologist 2008, 177:802-810.
16. Franks SJ, Sim S, Weis AE. Rapid evolution of flowering time by an annual plant in response to a climate fluctuation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2007, 104:1278-1282.
17. Galen C. Rates of floral evolution: adaptation to bumblebee pollination in an alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 1996, 50:120-125.
18. Gigord LDB, Macnair MR, Smithson A. Negative frequency-dependent selection maintains a dramatic flower color polymorphism in the rewardless orchid Dactylorhiza sambucina (L.) Soo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2001, 98:6253-6255.
19. Gómez JM. Herbivory reduces the strength of pollinator-mediated selection in the Mediterranean herb Erysimum mediohispanicum: consequences for plant specialization. American Naturalist 2003, 162:242-256.
20. Grindeland JM, Sletvold N, Ims RA. Effects of floral display size and plant density on pollinator visitation rate in a natural population of Digitalis purpurea. Functional Ecology 2005, 19:383-390.
21. Harder LD, Johnson SD. Darwin's beautiful contrivances: evolutionary and functional evidence for floral adaptation. New Phytologist 2009, 183:530-545.
22. Internicola AI, Bernasconi G, Gigord LDB. Should food-deceptive species flower before or after rewarding species? An experimental test of pollinator visitation behaviour under contrasting phenologies. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2008, 21:1358-1365.
23. Johnson SD. Evidence for Batesian mimicry in a butterfly-pollinated orchid. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 1994, 53:91-104.
24. Johnson SD, Nilsson LA. Pollen carryover, geitonogamy, and the evolution of deceptive pollination systems in orchids. Ecology 1999, 80:2607-2619.
25. Johnson SD, Peter CI, Ågren J. The effects of nectar addition on pollen removal and geitonogamy in the non-rewarding orchid Anacamptis morio. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 2004, 271:803-809.
26. Johnson SD, Peter CI, Nilsson LA, Ågren J. Pollination success in a deceptive orchid is enhanced by co-occurring rewarding magnet plants. Ecology 2003, 84:2919-2927.
27. Johnson SD, Steiner KE. Long-tongued fly pollination and evolution of floral spur length in the Disa draconis complex (Orchidaceae). Evolution 1997, 51:45-53.
28. Knight TM, Steets JA, Vamosi JC, Mazer SJ, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Mitchell RJ, Ashman T-L. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction pattern and process. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 2005, 36:467-497.
29. Lande R, Arnold SJ. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 1983, 37:1210-1226.
30. Mitchell RJ, Karron JD, Holmquist KG, Bell JM. The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Functional Ecology 2004, 18:116-124.
31. Nazarov VV, Gerlach G. The potential seed productivity of orchid flowers and peculiarities of their pollination systems. Lindleyana 1997, 12:188-204.
32. Neiland MRM, Wilcock CC. Fruit set, nectar reward, and rarity in the Orchidaceae. American Journal of Botany 1998, 85:1657-1671.
33. Nilsson AL. The pollination ecology of Dactylorhiza sambucina. Botaniske Notiser 1980, 133:368-385.
34. Nilsson AL. Orchid pollination biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1992, 7:255-259.
35. O'Connell LM, Johnston MO. Male and female pollination success in a deceptive orchid, a selection study. Ecology 1998, 79:1246-1260.
36. Øien D-I, Moen A. Flowering and survival of Dactylorhiza lapponica and Gymnadenia conopsea in the Sølendet Nature Reserve, Central Norway. Trends and fluctuations and underlying mechanisms in terrestrial orchid populations 2002, 3-22. Kindlmann P, Willems JHWhigham DF. eds, Leiden, the Netherlands, Backhuys Publishers
37. Quinn GP, Keough MJ. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists 2002, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
38. Ridenhour BJ. Identification of selective sources: partitioning selection based on interactions. American Naturalist 2005, 166:12-25.
39. Ruxton GD, Schaefer HM. The timing of food-deceptive flowers: a commentary on Internicola et al. (2008). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2009, 22:1133-1136.
40. Sandring S, Ågren J. Pollinator-mediated selection on floral display and flowering time in the perennial herb Arabidopsis lyrata. Evolution 2009, 63:1292-1300.
41. Schiestl FP. On the success of a swindle: pollination by deception in orchids. Naturwissenschaften 2005, 92:255-264.
42. Sletvold N, Øien D-I, Moen A. Long-term influence of mowing on population dynamics in the rare orchid Dactylorhiza lapponica: the importance of recruitment and seed production. Biological Conservation 2010, 143:747-755.
43. Smithson A, Macnair MR. Density-dependent and frequency-dependent selection by bumblebees Bombus terrestris (L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 1997, 60:401-417.
44. Strauss SY, Irwin RE. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant-animal interactions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2004, 35:435-466.
45. Sun H-Q, Cheng J, Zhang F-M, Luo Y-B, Ge S. Reproductive success of non-rewarding Cypripedium japonicum benefits from low spatial dispersion pattern and asynchronous flowering. Annals of Botany 2009, 103:1227-1237.
46. Toräng P, Ehrlén J, Ågren J. Facilitation in an insect-pollinated herb with a floral display dimorphism. Ecology 2006, 87:2113-2117.
47. Toräng P, Ehrlén J, Ågren J. Mutualists and antagonists mediate frequency-dependent selection on floral display. Ecology 2008, 89:1564-1572.
48. Tremblay RL, Ackerman JD, Zimmerman JK, Calvo RN. Variation in sexual reproduction in orchids and its evolutionary consequences: a spasmodic journey to diversification. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 2005, 84:1-54.
49. Wade MJ, Kalisz S. The causes of natural selection. Evolution 1990, 44:1947-1955.