Brains as analog-model computers

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 271-279

  Shagrir, Oron ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Analog computers; Computation; Computational neuroscience; Representation; Simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957129665     PISSN: 00393681     EISSN: 18792510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andersen R.A., Essick G.K., Siegel R.M. Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science 1985, 230(4724):456-458.
2. Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan.
3. Chalmers D.J. Does a rock implement every finite-state automaton?. Synthese 1996, 108:309-333.
4. Churchland, P. S., Koch, C., & Sejnowski T. J. (1990). What is computational neuroscience? In E. L. Schwartz (Ed.), Computational neuroscience (pp. 46-55). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Churchland, P. S., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1992). The computational brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Cohen Kadosh R., Cohen Kadosh K., Kaas A., Henik A., Goebel R. Notation-dependent and -independent representations of numbers in the parietal lobes. Neuron 2007, 53:307-314.
7. Cummins R. The nature of psychological explanation 1983, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Dehaene S. Numerical cognition 1993, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
9. Dretske F. Explaining behavior 1988, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Egan F. Computation and content. Philosophical Review 1995, 104:181-203.
11. Egan F. Computational models: A modest role for content. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2010, 41(3):253-259.
12. Fodor J.A. Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1980, 3:63-73.
13. Goldman M.S., Kaneko C.R.S., Major G., Aksay E., Tank D.W., Seung H.S. Linear regression of eye velocity on eye position and head velocity suggests a common oculomotor neural integrator. Journal of Neurophysiology 2002, 88:659-665.
14. Grice P. Meaning. The Philosophical Review 1957, 66:377-388.
15. Grush, R. (2001). The semantic challenge to computational neuroscience. In P. Machamer, R. Grush, & P. McLaughlin (Eds.), Theory and method in the neurosciences (pp. 155-172). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
16. Haugeland J. The nature and plausibility of cognitivism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1978, 2:215-226.
17. Koch, C. (1999). The biophysics of computation. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. McCulloch W., Pitts W. A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 1943, 5:115-133.
19. Marr D. Vision 1982, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
20. Marr D., Hildreth E. Theory of edge detection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences 1980, 207(1167):187-217.
21. Minsky, M. (1967). Computation: Finite and infinite machines. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22. Norman, D., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. Davidson, G. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self regulation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. 4 (pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum.
23. Piazza M., Pinel P., Le Bihan D., Dehaene S. A magnitude code common to numerosities and number symbols in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron 2007, 53:293-305.
24. Piccinini G. Computing mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 2007, 74:501-526.
25. Piccinini G. Computers. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 2008, 89:32-73.
26. Piccinini, G. (n.d.). Digits, strings, and spikes: Empirical evidence against computationalism. Unpublished manuscript.
27. Piccinini G., Scarantino A. Computation vs. information processing: Why their difference matters to cognitive science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2010, 41(3):237-246.
28. Putnam, H. (1988). Representations and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Robinson D.A. Integrating with neurons. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1989, 12:33-45.
30. Scheutz M. Computational versus causal complexity. Minds and Machines 2001, 11:543-566.
31. Searle, J. R. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Sejnowski T.J., Koch C., Churchland P.S. Computational neuroscience. Science 1988, 241(4871):1299-1306.
33. Seung S.H. How the brain keeps the eyes still. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of USA 1996, 93:13339-13344.
34. Seung S.H. Continuous attractors and oculomotor control. Neural Networks 1998, 11:1253-1258.
35. Shadmehr, R., & Wise, S. P. (2005). The computational neurobiology of reaching and pointing: A foundation for motor learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Shagrir O. Content, computation and externalism. Mind 2001, 110:369-400.
37. Shagrir O. Why we view the brain as a computer. Synthese 2006, 153:393-416.
38. Shagrir, O. (2010a). Marr on computational-level theories. Philosophy of science, in press.
39. Shagrir, O. (2010b). Computation, San Diego style. Philosophy of science, in press.
40. Sprevak M. Computation, individuation, and the representation condition. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2010, 41(3):260-270.
41. Stern P., Travis J. Of bytes and brains. Science 2006, 314(5796):75.
42. Thomson, W. (Lord Kelvin) (n.d.). The tides. Zapato Productions Intradimensional. (Evening lecture to the British Association at the Southampton meeting on Friday, August 25, 1882). http://zapatopi.net/kelvin/papers/the_tides.html.
43. Zipser D., Andersen R.A. A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons. Nature 1988, 331:679-684.