Why Catalonia cannot be considered as a regional innovation system

Scientometrics

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 215-240

  Vilanova, Marta Riba ^a   Leydesdorff, Loet ^b  

^a EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010616855     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1010517505793     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. ARTHUR, W. B. (1989), Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events, Economic Journal, 99:116-131.
2. BACARIA, J., S. BORRAS ALOMAR (1998), The Catalan innovation system. Governing rapid changes, In: H.-J. BRACZYK, P. COOKE, M. HEIDENREICH (Eds). Regional Innovation Systems, University College London Press, London, Bristol PA, pp. 72-97.
3. BARCELO I ROCA, M. (1993), Innovacio tecnologica i industria a Catalunya, La Llar de Llibre, Barcelona.
4. BLAUWHOF, G. (1995), The Non-Linear Dynamics of Technological Developments: An Exploration of Telecommunications Technology, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.
5. BLUME, STUART S. (1992), Insight and Industry: The Dynamics of Technological Change in Medicine, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. BORRAS ALOMAR, S. (1995), Governing Systems of Innovation: Regions and Technology in Europe. The case study of Catalonia in the 1980s and 1990s. Ph.D. Thesis, mimeo, Instituto Universitario Europeo, Florence.
7. BECK, U. (1999), Schöne neue Arbeitswelt, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt, New York.
8. CARPENTER, M., F. NARIN (1981), The adequacy of the Science Citation Index (SCI) as an indicator of international scientific activity, Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 32:430-439.
9. CASTELLS, M. (1997), The Power of Identity, Blackwell, London.
10. COLES, S., CIMOLI, M. (Eds), 2000, Developing Innovation System: Mexico in the Global Context, Continuum Publishing Group, London, New York.
11. COMMISSIO INTERDEPARTAMENTAL DE RECERCA I INNOVACIO TECNOLOGICA (1997) II Pla de Recerca de Catalunya 1997/2000, Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona.
12. COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, AND COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1992) Treaty on European Union, Office for Offical Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
13. COOKE, P. (1998), Introduction. The origins of the concept. In: Regional Innovation Systems, H.-J. BRACZYK, P. COOKE, M. HEIDENREICH (Eds), University College London Press, London, Bristol PA, pp. 2-25.
14. COOKE, P., M. G. URANGA, G. ETXEBARRIA (1997), Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions, Research Policy, 26:475-491.
15. COOKE, P., M. G. URANGA, G. ETXEBARRIA (1998), Regional systems of innovation: An evolutionary perspective, Environment and Planning A, 30, 1563-1584.
16. COWAN, R., D. FORAY (1997), The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge, MERIT, Maastricht.
17. DEPARTMENT FOR TRADE AND INDUSTRY (1998), Our Competitive Future: Building the Knowledge-Driven Economy: Analytical Background, DTI, London. http://www.dti.gov.uk/cornp/competitive/an_reprt.htm
18. ETZKOWITZ, H., L. LEYDESDORFF (1998), The endless transition: A "Triple Helix" of university-industry-government relations: Introduction to a theme issue, Minerva, 36:203-208.
19. ETZKOWITZ, H., L. LEYDESDORFF (2000), The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, 29: 109-123.
20. FRENKEN, K., L. LEYDESDORFF (2000), Scaling trajectories in civil aircraft (1913-1997), Research Policy, 29: 331-348.
21. FORAY, D. (1998), Errors and mistakes in technological systems: from potential regret to path dependent inefficiency, In: J. LESOURNE, A. ORLEAN (Eds.) Advances in Self-Organisation and Evolutionary Economics, Economica, London, pp. 217-239.
22. GASOLIBA BÖHM, C. A. (1996), 10 anys d'integracio Europea, Vicens Vives, Barcelona.
23. GEBHARDT, C. (1997), Die Regionalisierung von Innovationsprozessen in der Informationstechnologie. Staatliche Forschungsfoerderung im Zeitalter der Globalisierung, Deutscher Universitaets Verlag, Wiesbaden.
24. GODIN, B., Y. GINGRAS (2000), The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy, 29:273-278.
25. GRUPP, H. (1996), Spillover effects and the science base of innovations reconsidered: an empirical approach, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 6:175-197.
26. GRUPP, H., U. SCHMOCH (1999), Patent statistics in the age of globalisation: new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation, Research Policy, 28:377-396.
27. GUIBERNAU, M. (1999), Nations without States. Political Communities in a Global Age, Polity Press, Cambridge.
28. HIRASAWA, R., T. IJICHI, H. TOMIZAWA, Y. FUJIGAKI (1998), A Comparative Survey on Science and Technology Policy System and on Policy Formulation Processes. Report for the STA: Special coordinating program 1998.
29. INSTITUT D'ESTUDIS CATALANS (1997), Reports de la recerca a Catalunya. Tecnologies de la informacio i de les comunicacions, IEC, Barcelona.
30. KATZ, J. S. (1999), The self-similar science system, Research Policy, 28:501-517.
31. LASH, S., J. URRY (1994), Economies of Signs and Space, Sage, London.
32. LEYDESDORFF, L. (1991), The static and dynamic analysis of network data using information theory, Social Networks, 13:301-345.
33. LEYDESDORFF, L. (1995), The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications, DSWO Press, Leiden University, Leiden.
34. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000), Is the EU becoming a single publication system? Scientometrics, 47:265-280.
35. LEYDESDORFF, L., H. ETZKOWITZ (1998), The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies, Science and Public Policy, 25:195-203.
36. LEYDESDORFF, L., N. OOMES (1999), Is the European monetary system converging to integration? Social Science Information, 38:57-86.
37. LUHMANN, N. (1984), Soziale Systeme: Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M., (1995, Social Systems (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).
38. LUHMANN, N. (1990), Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.
39. LUNDVALL, B.-Å. (1988), Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation, In: G. DOSI, C. FREEMAN, R.R. NELSON, G. SILVERBERG, L. SOETE (Eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London, pp. 349-369.
40. MACDONALD, S. (1986), The distinctive research of the individual inventor, Research Policy, 15:199-210.
41. MOTHE, J. DE LA, G. PAQUET (Eds) (1996), Evolutionary Economics and the New International Political Economy, Cassell Academic, London.
42. MOTHE, J. DE LA, G. PAQUET (1998), Local and Regional Systems of Innovation, Kluwer, Boston.
43. NARIN, F., D. OLIVASTRO (1988), Technology Indicators Based on Patents and Patent Citations, In: A.F.J. VAN RAAN (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 465-507.
44. NARIN, F., D. OLIVASTRO (1992), Status report: linkages between technology and science, Research Policy, 14:237-249.
45. NARIN, F., K. S. HAMILTON, D. OLIVASTRO (1997), The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science, Research Policy, 26:317-320.
46. NAUWELAERS C., A. REID (1995), Methodologies for the evaluation of regional innovation potential, Scientometrics, 34:497-511.
47. NELSON, R. R. (Ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Study, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.
48. NELSON, R. R. (1994), Economic growth via the coevolution of technology and institutions, In: L. LEYDESDORFF, P. VAN DEN BESSELAAR (Eds), Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies, Pinter, London and New York, pp. 21-32.
49. NELSON, R. R., WINTER, S. G. (1975), Growth theory from an evolutionary perspective: The differential productivity growth puzzle, American Economic Review, 65:338.
50. NELSON, R. R., WINTER, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
51. ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (1999), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 1999. Benchmarking Knowledge-based Economies, OECD, Paris.
52. PATEL, P., K. PAVITT (1994), The nature and economic importance of national innovation systems, STI Science Technology Industry Review, 14:9-32.
53. PAVITT, K. (1984), Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a theory and a taxonomy, Research Policy, 13:343-73.
54. PAVITT, K. (1985), Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems, Scientometrics, 1:77-99.
55. PETITBO, A., J. BOSCH (1990), Estructura industrial. In: M. PARALLADA (Ed.), Estructura economica de Cataluna, Espasa-Calpe, Madrid, pp. 225-250.
56. ROSA PIRES, A. DA, E. ANSELMO DE CASTRO (1997), Can a strategic project for a university be strategic to regional development? Science and Public Policy, 24:15-20.
57. SHINN, T. (1998), The impact of research and education on industry: A comparative analysis of the relationship of education and research systems to industrial progress in six countries, Industry & Higher Education, 12:270-289.
58. SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1934), Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.
59. THEIL, H. (1972), Statistical Decomposition Analysis, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
60. VENCE, X. (1998), La politico tecnologica comunitaria y la cohesion regional. Los retos de los sistemas de innovacion perifericos, Civitas, Madrid.
61. WEBSTER, A., K. PACKER (1996), Intellectual property and the wider innovation system, In: A. WEBSTER, K. PACKER (Eds), Innovation and the Intellectual Property System, Kluwer, London, pp. 1-19.
62. WHITLEY, R. R. (1984), The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
63. ZITT, M., R. BARRE, A. SIGOGNEAU, F. LAVILLE (1999), Territorial concentration and evolution of science and technology activities in the European Union: A descriptive analysis, Research Policy, 28:545-562.