How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25years of research

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1023-1035

  Burden, Adrian ^a  

^a MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Comparison; Electromyography; Inter individual variability; Isometric MVC; Reliability

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; DYNAMIC EXERCISE; ELBOW FLEXION; ELECTROMYOGRAM; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISOKINETIC EXERCISE; KINEMATICS; MUSCLE FATIGUE; MUSCLE FORCE; MUSCLE FUNCTION; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; PATTERN STIMULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT;

ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77957018598     PISSN: 10506411     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.07.004     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Allen G.M., Gandevia S.C., McKenzie D.K. Reliability of measurements of muscle strength and voluntary activation using twitch interpolation. Muscle Nerve 1995, 18:593-600.
2. Allen G.M., McKenzie D.K., Gandevia S.C. Twitch interpolation of the elbow flexor muscles at high forces. Muscle Nerve 1998, 21:318-328.
3. Allison G.T., Marshall R.N., Singer K.P. EMG signal amplitude normalization technique in stretch-shortening cycle movements. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1993, 3:236-244.
4. Allison G.T., Godfrey P., Robinson G. EMG signal amplitude assessment during abdominal bracing and hollowing. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1998, 8:51-57.
5. Amiridis I.G., Martin A., Morlon B., Martin L., Cometti G., Pousson M., et al. Co-activation and tension regulating phenomena during isokinetic knee extension in sedentary and highly skilled humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 1996, 73:149-156.
6. Araujo R.C., Duarte M., Amadio A.C. On the inter- and intra-subject variability of the electromyographic signal in isometric contractions. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2000, 40:225-229.
7. Ball N., Scurr J. An assessment of the reliability and standardisation of tests used to elicit reference muscular actions for electromyographical normalisation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2010, 20:81-88.
8. Balogh I., Hansson G.-A., Ohlsson K., Stromberg U., Skerfving S. Interindividual variation of physical load in a work task. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999, 25:57-66.
9. Bao S., Mathiasson S.E., Winkel J. Normalizing upper trapezius EMG amplitude: comparison of different procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1995, 5:251-257.
10. Barr A.E., Goldsheyder D., Özkaya N., Nordin M. Testing apparatus and experimental procedure for position specific normalization of electromyographic measurements of dital upper extremity musculature. Clin Biomech 2001, 16:576-585.
11. Bemben M.G., Clasey J.L., Massey B.H. The effect of the rate of muscle contraction on the force-time curve parameters of male and female subjects. Res Q Exerc Sport 1990, 61:96-99.
12. Benoit D.L., Lamontagne M., Cerulli G., Liti A. The clinical significance of electromyography normalisation techniques in subjects with anterior cruciate ligament injury during treadmill walking. Gait Posture 2003, 18:56-63.
13. Bland M.J., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two measures of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 1:307-310.
14. Bobbert M.F., Harlaar J. Evaluation of moment-angle curves in isokinetic knee extension. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992, 25:251-259.
15. Bolgla L.A., Uhl T.L. Reliability of electromyographic normalization methods for evaluating of the hip musculature. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2007, 17:102-111.
16. Burden A.M. Surface electromyography. Biomechanical evaluation of movement in sport and exercise 2008, 77-102. Routledge, London. C.J. Payton, R.M. Bartlett (Eds.).
17. Burden A.M., Bartlett R.M. Normalisation of EMG amplitude: an evaluation and comparison of old and new methods. Med Eng Phys 1999, 21:247-257.
18. Burden A.M., Trew M., Baltzopoulos V. Normalisation of gait EMGs: a re-examination. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2003, 13:519-532.
19. Burnett A., Green J., Netto K., Rodrigues J. Examination of EMG normalisation methods for the study of the posterior and posterolateral neck muscles in healthy controls. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2007, 17:635-641.
20. Campenella B., Mattacola C.G., Kimura I.F. Effect of visual feedback and verbal encouragement on concentric quadriceps and hamstrings peak torque of males and females. Isokinet Exerc Sci 2000, 8:1-6.
21. Chapman A.R., Vicenzino B., Blanch P., Knox J.J., Hodges P.W. Intramuscular fine-wire electromyography during cycling: repeatability, normalisation and a comparison to surface electromyography. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2010, 20:108-117.
22. Clarys J.P. Electromyography in sports and occupational settings: an update of its limits and possibilities. Ergonomics 2000, 43:1750-1762.
23. Clarys J.P., Cabri J. Electromyography and the study of sports movements: a review. J Sports Sci 1993, 11:379-448.
24. Cram J.R., Kasman G.S. Introduction to surface electromyography 1998, ASPEN, Gaithersburg, Maryland, MD.
25. Cramer J.T., Housh T.J., Johnson G.O., Ebersole K.T., Perry S.R., Bull A.J. Mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power output during maximal, concentric, isokinetic muscle actions. Muscle Nerve 2000, 23:1826-1831.
26. Cramer J.T., Housh T.J., Weir J.P., Johnson G.O., Ebersole K.T., Perry S.R., et al. Power output, mechanomyographic, and electromyographic responses to maximal, concentric, isokinetic muscle actions in men and women. J Strength Cond Res 2002, 16:399-408.
27. Dankaerts W., O'Sullivan P.B., Burnett A.F., Straker L.M., Danneels L.A. Reliability of EMG measurements for trunk muscles during maximal and sub-maximal voluntary isometric contractions in healthy controls and CLBP patients. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2004, 14:333-342.
28. De Luca C. The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J Appl Biomech 1997, 13:135-163.
29. Eberhart H.D., Inman V.T., Bresler B. The principal elements in human locomotion. Human limbs and their substitutes 1954, 437-471. McGraw-Hill, New York. P.E. Klopsteg, P.D. Wilson (Eds.).
30. Ekstrom R.A., Soderberg G.L., Donatelli R.A. Normalization procedures using maximum voluntary isometric contractions for the serratus anterior and trapezius muscles during surface EMG analysis. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2005, 15:418-428.
31. Enoka R.M., Fuglevand A.J. Neuromuscular basis of the maximum voluntary force capacity of muscle. Current issues in biomechanics 1993, 215-235. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL. M.D. Grabiner (Ed.).
32. Fernández-Pena E., Lucertini F., Ditroilo M. A maximal isokinetic pedalling exercise for EMG normalization in cycling. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2009, 19:e162-e170.
33. Finucane S.D.G., Rafeei T., Kues J., Lamb R.L., Mayhew T.P. Reproducibility of electromyographic recordings of submaximal concentric and eccentric muscle contractions in humans. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998, 109:290-296.
34. Ghori G.M.U., Donne B., Luckwill R.G. Relationship between torque and EMG activity of a knee extensor muscle during isokinetic concentric and eccentric actions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1995, 5:109-115.
35. Hansson G.-A., Nordander C., Asterland P., Ohlsson K., Stromberg U., Skerfving S., et al. Sensitivity of trapezius electromyography to differences between work tasks - influence of gap definition and normalisation methods. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2000, 10:103-115.
36. Hershler C., Milner M. An optimality criterion for processing electromyographic (EMG) signals relating to human locomotion. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1978, 25:413-420.
37. Hsu W.-L., Krishnamoorthy V., Scholz J.P. An alternative test of electromyographic normalization in patients. Muscle Nerve 2006, 33:232-241.
38. Hunter A.M., St.Clair Gibson A., Lambert M., Noakes T.D. Electromyographic (EMG) normalization method for cycle fatigue protocols. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002, 34:857-861.
39. Jobe F.W., Radovich D., Tibone J.E., Perry J. An EMG analysis of the shoulder in pitching: a second report. Am J Sports Med 1984, 12:218-220.
40. Kamen G., Gabriel D. Essentials of electromyography 2010, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.
41. Kashigawa K., Tanaka M., Kawazoe T., Furuichi K., Takada H. Effect of amplitude normalization on surface EMG linear envelopes of masticatory muscles during gum chewing. J Osaka Dent Univ 1995, 29:19-28.
42. Kasprisin J.E., Grabiner M.D. EMG variability during maximal voluntary isometric and anisometric contractions is reduced using spatial averaging. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1998, 8:45-50.
43. Kellis E., Baltzopoulos V. The effects of normalization method on antagonistic activity patterns during eccentric and concentric isokinetic knee extension and flexion. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1996, 6:235-245.
44. Kelly B.T., Kadrmas W.R., Kirkendall D.T., Speer K.P. Optimal normalization tests for shoulder muscle activation: an electromyographic study. J Orthop Res 1996, 14:647-653.
45. Knudson D.V., Johnston D. Comparison of EMG normalization methods in a sit-to-stand movement. J Hum Movement Stud 1993, 25:39-50.
46. Knutson L.M., Soderberg G.L., Ballantyne B.T., Clarke W.R. A study of various normalization procedures for within day electromyographic data. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1994, 4:47-59.
47. Knutson L.M., Soderberg G.L. EMG: use and interpretation in gait. Gait analysis: theory and application 1995, Mosby, St. Louis, MO. R.L. Craik, C.A. Oatis (Eds.).
48. Koh T.J., Grabiner M.D., Clough C.A. Bilateral deficit is larger for step than for ramp isometric contractions. J Appl Physiol 1993, 74:1200-1205.
49. Komi P.V. Relationship between muscle tension, EMG and velocity of contraction under concentric and eccentric work. New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology 1973, 596-606. Karger, Basel. J.E. Desmedt (Ed.).
50. Komi P.V. Mechanical and electrical behaviour of human muscle during maximal concentric and eccentric contractions. Biomechanics IV 1974, 428-433. Macmillan, London. R.C. Nelson, C.A. Morehouse (Eds.).
51. Komi P.V., Buskirk E.R. Effect of eccentric and concentric muscle conditioning on tension and electrical activity of human muscle. Ergonomics 1972, 15:417-434.
52. Kumar S. Electromyography in ergonomics. Electromyography in ergonomics 1996, 1-50. Taylor & Francis, London. S. Kumar, A. Mital (Eds.).
53. Leedham J.S., Dowling J.J. Force-length, torque-angle and EMG-joint angle relationships of the human in vivo biceps brachii. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995, 70:421-426.
54. Lehman G.J. Clinical considerations in the use of surface electromyography: three experimental studies. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002, 25:293-299.
55. Lehman G.J., McGill S.M. The importance of normalization in the interpretation of surface electromyography: a proof of principle. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999, 22:444-446.
56. Marras W.S., Davis K.G. A non-MVC EMG normalization technique for the trunk musculature. Part 1: Method development. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2001, 11:1-9.
57. Marras W.S., Davis K.G., Maronitis A.B. A non-MVC EMG normalization technique for the trunk musculature. Part 2: Validation and use to predict spinal loads. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2001, 11:11-18.
58. Mathiassen S.E., Winkel J., Hagg G.M. Normalization of surface EMG amplitude from the upper trapezius muscle in ergonomic studies - a review. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1995, 5:197-226.
59. McLean L., Chislett M., Keith M., Murphy M., Walton P. The effect of head position, electrode site, movement and smoothing window in the determination of a reliable maximum voluntary activation of the upper trapezius muscle. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2003, 13:169-180.
60. Merletti R., Wallinga W., Hermens H.J., Freriks B. Guidelines for reporting SEMG data. European recommendations for surface electromyography: results of the SENIAM project 1999, 103-105. Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede. H.J. Hermens, B. Freriks, R. Merletti, D. Stegeman, J. Blok, G. Rau, C. Disselhorst-Klug, G. Hägg (Eds.).
61. Milerad E., Ericson M.O., Nisell R., Kilbom A. An electromyographic study of dental work. Ergonomics 1991, 34:953-962.
62. Mirka G.A. The quantification of EMG normalization error. Ergonomics 1991, 34:343-352.
63. Morris A.D., Kemp G.J., Lees A., Frostick S.P. A study of the reproducibility of three different normalisation methods in intramuscular dual fine wire electromyography of the shoulder. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1998, 8:317-322.
64. Netto K.J., Burnett A.F. Reliability of normalisation methods for EMG analysis of neck muscles. Work 2006, 26:123-130.
65. Ng J.K.-F., Kippers V., Parnianpour M., Richardson C.A. EMG activity normalization for trunk muscles in subjects with and without back pain. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002, 34:1082-1086.
66. Nieminen H., Takala E.-P., Viikari-Juntura E. Normalization of electromyogram in the neck-shoulder region. Eur J Appl Physiol 1993, 67:199-207.
67. Nishijima Y., Kato T., Yoshizawa M., Miyashita M., Iida H. Application of the segment weight dynamic movement method to the normalization of gait EMG amplitude. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2010, 20:550-557.
68. Norcross M.F., Blackburn J.T., Goerger B.M. Reliability and interpretation of single leg stance and maximum voluntary isometric contraction methods of electromyography normalization. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2010, 20:420-425.
69. Okada M, Saitou K. Effects of the mode and velocity of isokinetic contractions on the surface EMG parameters. In: Arsenault AB, McKinley P, McFadyen B, editors. Proceedings of the 12th congress of the international society of electrophysiology and kinesiology, Montreal, Canada; 1998. p. 86-7.
70. Perry J. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function 1992, SLACK, Thorofare, NJ.
71. Robertson D.G.E. Electromyographical kinesiology. Research methods in biomechanics 2004, 163-182. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL. D.G.E. Robertson, G.E. Caldwell, J. Hamill, G. Kamen, S.N. Whittlesey (Eds.).
72. Roos M.R., Rice C.L., Connelly D.M., Vanervoot A.A. Quadriceps muscle strength, contractile properties, and motor unit firing rates in young and old men. Muscle Nerve 1999, 22:1094-1103.
73. Rothstein J.M., Delitto A., Sinacore D.R., Rose S.J. Electromyographic, peak torque, and power relationships during isokinetic movement. Phys Ther 1983, 63:926-933.
74. Rouffet D.M., Hautier C.A. EMG normalization to study muscle activation in cycling. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2008, 18:866-878.
75. Seger J.Y., Thorstensson A. Muscle strength and myoelectric activity in prepubertal and adult males and females. Eur J Appl Physiol 1994, 69:81-87.
76. Shiavi R., Bourne J., Holland A. Automated extraction of activity features in linear envelopes of locomotor electromyographic patterns. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1986, 33:594-600.
77. Shiavi R., Bugle H.J., Limbird T. Electromyographic gait assessment. Part 1: Adult EMG profiles and walking speed. J Rehabil Res Dev 1987, 24:13-23.
78. Smith D.B., Housh T.J., Johnson G.O., Evetovich T.K., Ebersole K.T., Perry S.R. Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses to eccentric and concentric to isokinetic muscle actions of the biceps brachii. Muscle Nerve 1998, 21:1438-1444.
79. Suter E., Herzog W., Huber A. Extent of motor unit activation in the quadriceps muscles of healthy subjects. Muscle Nerve 1996, 19:1046-1048.
80. Vera-Garcia F.J., Moreside J.M., McGill S.M. MVC techniques to normalize trunk muscle EMG in healthy women. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2010, 20:10-16.
81. Westing S.H., Cresswell A.G., Thorstensson A. Muscle activation during maximal voluntary eccentric and concentric knee extension. Eur J Appl Physiol 1991, 62:194-208.
82. Winter D. EMG interpretation. Electromyography in ergonomics 1996, 109-125. Taylor & Francis, London. S. Kumar, A. Mital (Eds.).
83. Yang J.F., Winter D.A. Electromyography reliability in maximal and submaximal isometric contractions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983, 64:417-420.
84. Yang J.F., Winter D.A. Electromyographic amplitude normalization methods: improving their sensitivity as diagnostic tools in gait analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984, 65:517-521.
85. Zakaria D., Kramer J.F., Harburn K.L. Reliability of non-normalized and normalized integrated EMG during maximal isometric contractions in females. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1996, 6:129-135.