Road noise exposure and residential property prices: Evidence from Hamburg

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 23-30

  Brandt, Sebastian ^a   Maennig, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Environmental disamenity; Hamburg; Hedonic method; Real estate economics; Traffic noise exposure

Indexed keywords

APARTMENT HOUSES; COSTS; HOUSING; NOISE POLLUTION; ROADS AND STREETS; TRANSPORTATION;

DISAMENITY; HAMBURG; HEDONIC METHOD; REAL ESTATE; TRAFFIC NOISE;

ACOUSTIC NOISE;

HEDONIC ANALYSIS; NOISE POLLUTION; PROPERTY MARKET; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; ROAD TRANSPORT;

GERMANY; HAMBURG [GERMANY];

EID: 77957016446     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2010.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ahlfeldt G., Maennig W. The role of architecture on urban revitalization: the case of " olympic arenas" in Berlin Prenzlauer Berg. Urban Studies 2009, 46(7):1343-1362.
2. Ahlfeldt G., Maennig W. Substitutability and complementarity of urban amenities: external effects of built heritage in Berlin. Real Estate Economics 2010, 38(2):285-325.
3. Andersson, H., Jonsson, L., Ögren, M., 2009. Property prices and exposure to multiple noise sources: hedonic regression with road and railway noise. Environmental Resource Economics. doi:10.1007/s10640-009-9306-4.
4. Bateman, I., Day, B., Lake, I., Lovett, A., 2001. The Effect of Road Traffic on Residential Property Values: A Literature Review and Hedonic Pricing Study. Report to the Scottish Executive Development Department. School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
5. Bowes D.R., Ihlanfeldt K.R. Identifying the impacts of rail transit stations on residential property values. Journal of Urban Economics 2001, 50(1):1-25.
6. BSU Zentren: Zentrale Standorte nach Flächennutzungsplan und Bestand der Nahversorgungszentren 2003, Behörde für Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt, Hamburg.
7. Can A., Megbolugbe I. Spatial dependence and house price index construction. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 1997, 14(1/2):203-222.
8. Crafts N. Market potential in British regions, 1871-1931. Regional Studies 2005, 39(9):1159-1166.
9. Day, B., Bateman, I., Lake, I., 2007. Beyond implicit prices: recovering theoretically consistent and transferable values for noise avoidance from a hedonic property price model. Environmental Resource Economics. doi:10.1007/s10640-007-9121-8.
10. Halvorsen R., Palmquist R. The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. American Economic Review 1980, 70(3):474-475.
11. Johnson K., Button K. Benefit transfers: are they a satisfactory input to benefit cost analysis? An airport noise nuisance case study. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 1997, 2(4):223-231.
12. Kim C.W., Phipps T.T., Anselin L. Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2003, 45(1):24-39.
13. Kim K.S., Park S.J., Kweon Y.-J. Highway traffic noise effects on land price in an urban area. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2007, 12(4):275-280.
14. Kuckartz U., Grunenberg H. Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2002 2002, Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage. Berlin.
15. Lijesen M., van der Straaten W., Dekkers J., van Elk R., Blokdijk J. How much noise reduction at airports?. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2010, 15(1):51-59.
16. McMillen D.P. Airport expansion and property values: the case of Chicago O'Hare airport. Journal of Urban Economics 2004, 55(3):627-640.
17. Miedema H.M.E., Vos H. Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1998, 104(6):3432-3445.
18. Morrell P., Lu C.H.-Y. Aircraft noise social cost and charge mechanisms - a case study of Amsterdam airport Schiphol. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2000, 5(4):305-320.
19. Navrud, S., 2002. The State-of-the-Art on Economic Valuation of Noise. Final Report to European Commission DG Environment. As: Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway.
20. Nelson J.P. Meta-analysis of airport noise and hedonic property values. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 2004, 38(1):1-27.
21. Pope J.C. Buyer information and the hedonic: the impact of a seller disclosure on the implicit price for airport noise. Journal of Urban Economics 2008, 63(2):498-516.
22. Schipper Y., Nijkamp P., Rietveld P. Why do aircraft noise value estimates differ? A meta-analysis. Journal of Air Transport Management 1998, 4(2):117-124.
23. Sirmans G.S., Macpherson D.A., Zietz E.N. The composition of hedonic pricing models. Journal of Real Estate Literature 2005, 13(1):3-43.
24. Wilhelmsson M. The impact of traffic noise on the values of single-family houses. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2000, 43(6):799-815.