How much noise reduction at airports?

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 51-59

  Lijesen, Mark ^a   Straaten, Willemijn van der ^a   Dekkers, Jasper ^a   Elk, Roel van ^b   Blokdijk, John ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b CPB NETHERLANDS BUREAU FOR ECONOMIC POLICY ANALYSIS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aviation; Hedonic pricing; Noise nuisance; Welfare analysis

Indexed keywords

AIR TRANSPORTATION; AIRPORTS; AVIATION; COST FUNCTIONS; COST REDUCTION; COSTS; ECONOMICS; NOISE POLLUTION;

GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION; HEDONIC PRICING; MARGINAL COSTS; NEGATIVE EXTERNALITIES; NOISE NUISANCE; OPTIMAL POLICIES; REDUCING NOISE; WELFARE ANALYSIS;

NOISE ABATEMENT;

AIRPORT; BOTTOM-UP APPROACH; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; NOISE POLLUTION; POLLUTION CONTROL; POLLUTION POLICY; STATE ROLE; URBAN POLLUTION; WELFARE IMPACT;

AMSTERDAM [NORTH HOLLAND]; BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; NORTH HOLLAND; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 71549119790     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2009.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bateman, I.J., Day, B., Lake, I., Lovett, A., 2001. The Effect of Road Traffic on Residential Property Values: A Literature Review and Hedonic Pricing Study. Report to the Scottish Office, Development Department, Edinburgh, School of Environmental Studies, University of East Anglia.
2. Dekkers, J., van der Straaten, W., 2008. Monetary Valuation of Aircraft Noise. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 08-064/3.
3. European Conference of Ministers of Transport, 1998. Efficient Transport for Europe. Policies for Internalisation of External Costs, ECMT, Brussels/Paris/Berlin.
4. European Community, 2005. Sourdine II, D4-1-2a, Capacity Results Schiphol. .
5. European Community, 2006. Sourdine II, D4-1-2b, Noise Results Amsterdam Schiphol. .
6. Lijesen, M., van der Straaten, W., Dekkers, J.E.C., van Elk, R., 2006. Geluidsnormen voor Schiphol, een welvaartseconomische benadering, CPB, Den Haag (report no. 116, in Dutch).
7. De Mooij, R., Tang, P., 2003. Four Futures of Europe, The Hague, Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
8. Morrison S.A., Winston C., and Watson T. Fundamental flaws of social regulation: the case of airplane noise. Journal of Law and Economics 42 (1999) 723-743
9. Navrud, S., 2002. The State-Of-The-Art on Economic Valuation of Noise. Final Report to European Commission DG Environment. Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway.
10. Nelson J.P. Meta-analysis of airport noise and hedonic property values, problems and prospects. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 38 (2004) 1-28
11. Palmquist R.B. Property value models. In: Mäler K.-G., and Vincent J.R. (Eds). Handbook of Environmental Economics, valuing environmental changes vol 2 (2003), Elsevier, North Holland 763-820
12. Schipper, Y., 1999. Market Structure and Environmental Costs in Aviation. A Welfare Analysis of European Air Transport Reform, Ph.D. Dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
13. SEO, RAND, 2005. Modelontwikkeling ACCM en Kwantitatieve Verkenning WLO Luchtvaartscenario's, Amsterdam (in Dutch).
14. Sheppard S. Hedonic analysis of housing markets. In: Mills E.S., and Cheshire P. (Eds). Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics (1999), Elsevier, Amsterdam
15. Udo, J., 2005. Valuing the Amenity of Quiet, a Hedonic Analysis. Master thesis, Universiteit van Tilburg.
16. Van Praag B.M.S., and Baarsma B.E. Using happiness surveys to value intangibles: the case of airport noise. Economic Journal 115 (2005) 224-246
17. Vermeulen, J.P.L., Boon, B.H., van Essen, H.P., den Boer, L.C., Dings, J.M.W., Bruinsma, F.R., Koetse, M.J. 2004. De prijs van een reis. De maatschappelijke kosten van het verkeer, Rapport, CE, Delft (in Dutch).