Strategic fit within family firms: The role of family influence and the effect on performance

Journal of Family Business Strategy

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 167-178

  Lindow, Corinna M ^a   Stubner, Stephan ^a   Wulf, Torsten ^a  

^a HHL LEIPZIG GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Family firms; Family influence; Performance; Strategic fit; Strategic management

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957011793     PISSN: 18778585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (117)

1. Aguinis H. Statistical power problems with moderated multiple regression in management research. Journal of Management 1995, 21(6):1141-1158.
2. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
3. Anderson R.C., Reeb D.M. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance 2003, 58(3):1301-1328.
4. Aragón-Sánchez A., Sánchez-Marín G. Strategic orientation, management characteristics, and performance: A study of Spanish SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management 2005, 43(3):287-308.
5. Armstrong J.S, Overton T.S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 1977, 14(3):396-402.
6. Arregle J.L., Hitt M.A., Sirmon D.G., Very P. The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies 2007, 44(1):73-95.
7. Astrachan J.H. Strategy in family business: Toward a multidimensional research agenda. Journal of Family Business Strategy 2010, 1(1):6-14.
8. Astrachan J.H., Klein S.B., Smyrnios K.X. The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review 2002, 15(1):45-58.
9. Barnett T., Eddleston K., Kellermanns F.W. The effects of family versus career role salience on the performance of family and nonfamily firms. Family Business Review 2009, 22(1):39-52.
10. Bartholomeusz S., Tanewski G.A. The relationship between family firms and corporate governance. Journal of Small Business Management 2006, 44(2):245-267.
11. Brunninge O., Nordqvist M., Wiklund J. Corporate governance and strategic change in SMEs: The effects of ownership, board composition and top management teams. Small Business Economics 2007, 29(3):295-308.
12. Carney M. Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2005, 29(3):249-265.
13. Chandler A.D. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise 1962, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
14. Channon D.F. The strategy and structue of British enterprise 1973, Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.
15. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., Kellermanns F.W. Priorities, resource stocks, and performance in family and nonfamily firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2009, 33(3):739-760.
16. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., Kellermanns F.W., Matherne C.F., Debicki B.J. Management journals as venues for publication of family business research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2008, 32(5):927-934.
17. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., Litz R.A. Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2004, 28(4):335-354.
18. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2003). Current trends and future directions in family business management studies: Toward a theory of the family firm. Coleman Foundation White Paper Series. Madison, WI: Coleman Foundation and U.S. Association of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Available at (Accessed June 2009). http://www.usasbe.org/knowledge/whitepapers/index.asp.
19. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., Sharma P. Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2005, 29(5):555-575.
20. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., Steier L.P. An introduction to theories of family business. Journal of Business Venturing 2003, 18(4):441-448.
21. Chrisman J.J., Sharma P., Taggar S. Family influences on firms: An introduction. Journal of Business Research 2007, 60(10):1005-1011.
22. Chua J.H., Chrisman J.J., Sharma P. Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1999, 23(4):19-39.
23. Cliff J.E., Jennings P.D. Commentary on the multidimensional degree of family influence construct and the F-PEC measurement instrument. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2005, 29(3):341-347.
24. Craig J.B.L., Moores K. A 10-year longitudinal investigation of strategy, systems, and environment on innovation in family firms. Family Business Review 2006, 19(1):1-10.
25. Daily C.M., Dollinger M.J. An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family Business Review 1992, 5(2):117-136.
26. Daily C.M., Dollinger M.J. Alternative methodologies for identifying family- versus nonfamily-managed businesses. Journal of Small Business Management 1993, 31(2):79-90.
27. Dess G.G., Robinson R.B. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal 1984, 5(3):265-273.
28. Dielman T.E. Applied regression analysis for business and economics 1991, Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA.
29. Donaldson L. The normal science of structural contingency theory. Handbook of organization studies 1996, 57-76. Sage, London. S. Clegg, C. Hardy, W.R. Nord (Eds.).
30. Donaldson L. The contingency theory of organizations 2001, Sage, London.
31. Doty D.H., Glick W.H., Huber G.P. Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Academy of Management Journal 1993, 36(6):1196-1250.
32. Drazin R., Van De Ven A.H. Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 1985, 30(4):514-539.
33. Dyer W.G. The family: The missing variable in organizational research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2003, 27(4):401-416.
34. Dyer W.G., Sánchez M. Current state of family business theory and practice as reflected in family business review. Family Business Review 1998, 11(4):287-295.
35. Fernández Z., Nieto M.J. Internationalization strategy of small and medium-sized family businesses: Some influential factors. Family Business Review 2005, 18(1):77-89.
36. Gallo M.A., Vilaseca A. Finance in family business. Family Business Review 1996, 9(4):387-401.
37. Geeraerts G. The effect of ownership on the organization structure in small firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 1984, 29(2):232-237.
38. Geiger S.W., Ritchie W.J., Marlin D. Strategy/structure fit and firm performance. Organization Development Journal 2006, 24(2):10-22.
39. Geringer J.M., Hebert L. Measuring performance of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies 1991, 22(2):249-263.
40. Goffee R., Scase R. Proprietorial control in family firms: Some functions of 'quasi-organic' management systems. Journal of Management Studies 1985, 22(1):53-68.
41. Gómez-Mejía L.R., Haynes K.T., Núñez-Nickel M., Jacobson K.J.L., Moyano-Fuentes J. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly 2007, 52(1):106-137.
42. Greiner L.E. Evolution and revolution as organizations grow: A company's past has clues for management that are critical to future success. Family Business Review 1997, 10(4):397-410.
43. Gudmundson D., Hartman E.A., Tower C.B. Strategic orientation: Differences between family and nonfamily firms. Family Business Review 1999, 12(1):27-39.
44. Habbershon T.G., Williams M.L. A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review 1999, 12(1):1-25.
45. Hall P.D. A historical overview of family firms in the United States. Family Business Review 1988, 1(1):51-68.
46. Hamilton R.T., Shergill G.S. The relationship between strategy-structure fit and financial performance in New Zealand: Evidence of generality and validity with enhanced controls. Journal of Management Studies 1992, 29(1):95-113.
47. Harris D., Martinez J.I., Ward J.L. Is strategy different for the family-owned business?. Family Business Review 1994, 7(2):159-174.
48. Holt D.T., Rutherford M.W., Kuratko D.F. Advancing the field of family business research: Further testing the measurement properties of the F-PEC. Family Business Review 2010, 23(1):76-88.
49. Ibrahim N.A., Angelidis J.P., Parsa F. Strategic management of family businesses: Current findings and directions for future research. International Journal of Management 2008, 25(1):95-110.
50. Ifera Family businesses dominate. Family Business Review 2003, 16(4):235-240.
51. James W.J., Hatten K.J. Further evidence on the validity of the self typing paragraph approach: Miles and Snow strategic archetypes in banking. Strategic Management Journal 1995, 16(2):161-168.
52. Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 1976, 3(4):305-360.
53. Kanuk L, Berenson C. Mail surveys and response rates: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Research 1975, 12(4):440-453.
54. Kellermanns F.W., Eddleston K.A. Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: A family perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2006, 30(6):809-830.
55. Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., Sarathy, R., & Murphy, F. (2010). Innovativeness in family firms: A family influence perspective. Small Business Economics, (Accessed March 2010). http://www.springerlink.%20com/content/04l30r4712224640/%3Fp=2162e07a1d9f43feb14bf83a8e1094b7%26pi=28.
56. Klein S.B. Family businesses in Germany: Significance and structure. Family Business Review 2000, 13(3):157-182.
57. Klein S.B., Astrachan J.H., Smyrnios K.X. The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2005, 29(3):321-339.
58. Kleinbaum D., Kupper L., Muller K. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods 2007, Duxberry Press, Pacific Grove, CA. 4th ed.
59. Kotey B. Goals, management practices, and performance of family SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research 2005, 11(1):3-24.
60. Le Breton-Miller I., Miller D. Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2006, 30(6):731-746.
61. Lee J. Family firm performance: Further evidence. Family Business Review 2006, 19(2):103-114.
62. Litz R.A. The family firm's exclusion from business school research: Explaining the void; addressing the opportunity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1997, 21(3):55-71.
63. Markides C.C., Williamson P.J. Corporate diversification and organizational structure: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal 1996, 39(2):340-367.
64. Marlin D., Hoffman J.J., Lamont B.T. Porter's generic strategies, dynamic environments, and performance: A profile deviation fit perspective. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 1994, 2(2):155-175.
65. Maury B. Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance 2006, 12(2):321-341.
66. Mccann J.E., Leon-Guerrero A.Y., Haley J.D. Strategic goals and practices of innovative family businesses. Journal of Small Business Management 2001, 39(1):50-59.
67. Mcconaughy D.L., Walker M.C., Henderson G.V., Mishra C.S. Founding family controlled firms: Efficiency and value. Review of Financial Economics 1998, 7(1):1-19.
68. Miles R.E., Snow C.C. Organizational strategy, structure, and process 1978, McGraw-Hill, New York.
69. Mintzberg H. Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science 1978, 24(9):934-948.
70. Mintzberg H. The structuring of organizations 1979, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
71. Naldi L., Nordqvist M., Sjöberg K., Wiklund J. Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review 2007, 20(1):33-47.
72. Nordqvist, M. (2007). Understanding the role of ownership in strategizing. Doctoral Dissertation, Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping.
73. Nordqvist M., Melin L. The promise of the strategy as practice perspective for family business strategy research. Journal of Family Business Strategy 2010, 1(1):15-25.
74. Norušis M.J. Statistical procedures companion 2005, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
75. Pearce J.A., Robbins D.K., Robinson R.B. The impact of grand strategy and planning formality on financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 1987, 8(2):125-134.
76. Pittino D., Visintin F. Innovation and strategic types of family SMEs: A test and extension of Miles and Snow's configurational model. Journal of Enterprising Culture 2009, 17(3):257-295.
77. Podsakoff P., Mackenzie S., Lee J., Podsakoff N. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88(5):879-903.
78. Pollak R. A transaction cost approach to families and households. Journal of Economic Literature 1985, 23(2):581-608.
79. Pondy L.R. Effects of size, complexity, and ownership on administrative intensity. Administrative Science Quarterly 1969, 14(1):47-60.
80. Porter M.E. Competitive strategy 1980, Free Press, New York.
81. Powell T.C. Organizational alignment as competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 1992, 13(2):119-134.
82. Poza E.J., Alfred T., Maheshwari A. Stakeholder perceptions of culture and management practices in family and family firms-A preliminary report. Family Business Review 1997, 10(2):135-155.
83. Rumelt R.P. Strategy, structure, and economic performance 1974, Harvard University Press, Boston.
84. Rutherford M.W., Muse L.A., Oswald S.L. A new perspective on the developmental model for family business. Family Business Review 2006, 19(4):317-333.
85. Sandberg W.R. Strategic management's potential contributions to a theory of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1992, 16(3):73-90.
86. Scherer F.M. Industrial market structure and economic performance 1980, Rand McNally, Chicago, IL.
87. Schulze W.S., Lubatkin M.H., Dino R.N., Buchholtz A.K. Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science 2001, 12(2):99-116.
88. Sciascia S., Mazzola P. Family involvement in ownership and management: Exploring nonlinear effects on performance. Family Business Review 2008, 21(4):331-345.
89. Sharma P. An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review 2004, 17(1):1-36.
90. Sharma P., Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H. Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review 1997, 10(1):1-35.
91. Sharma P., Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H. Das Management von Familienunternehmen: Einleitung und Folgerungen. Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship 2008, 56(1/2):1-17.
92. Shortell S.M., Zajac E.J. Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow's strategic types: A comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity. Academy of Management Journal 1990, 33(4):817-832.
93. Slater S.F., Narver J.C. Product-market strategy and performance: An analysis of the Miles and Snow strategy types. European Journal of Marketing 1993, 27(10):33-51.
94. Snow C.C., Hrebiniak L.G. Strategy, distinctive competence, and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 1980, 25(2):317-336.
95. Steier L. Variants of agency contracts in family-financed ventures as a continuum of familial altruistic and market rationalities. Journal of Business Venturing 2003, 18(5):597-618.
96. Swartz S. The challenges of multidisciplinary consulting to family-owned businesses. Family Business Review 1989, 2(4):329-339.
97. Tagiuri R., Davis J. Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review 1996, 9(2):199-208.
98. Upton N., Teal E.J., Felan J.T. Strategic and business planning practices of fast growth family firms. Journal of Small Business Management 2001, 39(1):60-72.
99. Van de Ven A.H., Drazin R. The concept of fit in contingency theory. Research in Organizational Behavior 1985, 7:333-365.
100. Venkatraman N. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review 1989, 14(3):423-444.
101. Venkatraman N. Performance implications of strategic coalignment: A methodological perspective. Journal of Management Studies 1990, 27(1):19-41.
102. Venkatraman N., Camillus J.C. Exploring the concept of " fit" in strategic management. Academy of Management Review 1984, 9(3):513-525.
103. Ward J.L. Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership 1987, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
104. Ward J.L. The special role of strategic planning for family businesses. Family Business Review 1988, 1(2):105-117.
105. Westhead P., Howorth C. Identification of different types of private family firms. Handbook of research on family business 2006, 180-195. Elgar, Cheltenham. P.Z. Poutziouris, K.X. Smyrnios, S.B. Klein (Eds.).
106. Westhead P., Howorth C. Ownership and management issues associated with family firm performance and company objectives. Family Business Review 2006, 19(4):301-316.
107. Whiteside M.F., Brown F.H. Drawbacks of a dual systems approach to family firms: Can we expand our thinking?. Family Business Review 1991, 4(4):383-395.
108. Wortman M.S. Theoretical foundations for family-owned business: A conceptual and research-based paradigm. Family Business Review 1994, 7(1):3-27.
109. Wrigley, L. (1970). Divisional autonomy and diversification. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
110. Zahra S.A. International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing 2003, 18(4):495-512.
111. Zahra S.A., Pearce J.A. Research evidence on the Miles-Snow typology. Journal of Management 1990, 16(4):751-768.
112. Zahra S.A., Sharma P. Family business research: A strategic reflection. Family Business Review 2004, 17(4):331-346.
113. Zajac E.J., Kraatz M.S., Bresser R.K.F. Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management Journal 2000, 21(4):429-453.
114. Zajac E.J., Shortell S.M. Changing generic strategies: Likelihood, direction, and performance implications. Strategic Management Journal 1989, 10(5):413-430.
115. Zellweger T., Nason R. A stakeholder perspective on family firm performance. Family Business Review 2008, 21(3):203-216.
116. Zellweger T.M., Astrachan J.H. On the emotional value of owning a firm. Family Business Review 2008, 21(4):347-363.
117. Zellweger T.M., Eddleston K.A., Kellermanns F.W. Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy 2010, 1(1):54-63.