Family influences on firms: An introduction

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 60, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1005-1011

  Chrisman, James J ^a,b   Sharma, Pramodita ^c   Taggar, Simon ^c  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Family business; Family dynamics; Theory of the family firm

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548268620     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.02.016     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Org. Behav. Human Decis. Process. 50 (1991) 179-211
2. Aldrich H.E., and Cliff J.E. The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: toward a family embeddedness perspective. J Bus Venturing 18 5 (2003) 573-596
3. Anderson R.C., and Reeb D.M. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. J Finance 58 (2003) 1301-1328
4. Bryk A.S., and Raudenbush S.W. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (1992), Sage Publications, Newbury Park (CA)
5. Carr J.C., and Sequeira J.M. Prior family business exposure as intergenerational influence and entrepreneurial intent: a theory of planned behavior. J Bus Res 60 (2007) 1090-1098 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.016 (this issue)
6. Chrisman J.J., Chua J., and Litz R. Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrep Theory Pract. 28 (2004) 335-354
7. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., and Sharma P. Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrep. Theory Pract 29 (2005) 555-575
8. Chrisman J.J., Steier L.P., and Chua J.H. Personalism, particularism, and the competitive behaviors and advantages of family firms. An introduction. Entrep Theory Pract 30 (2006) 719-729
9. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., Kellermanns F.W., and Chang E.P.C. Are family managers agents or stewards? An exploratory study in privately held family firms. J Bus Res 60 (2007) 1030-1038 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.011 (this issue)
10. Corbetta G., and Salvato C. Self-serving of self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: a commentary on "Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrep Theory Pract 28 (2004) 355-362
11. Danes S.M., Stafford K., and Loy J.T.-C. Family business performance: the effects of gender and management. J Bus Res 60 (2007) 1058-1069 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.013 (this issue)
12. Doty D.H., and Glick W.H. Typologies as a unique form of theory building: toward improved understanding and modeling. Acad Manage Rev 19 2 (1994) 230-251
13. Du Toit M., and Du Toit S. Interactive LISREL: User's Guide (2001), Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood (IL)
14. Ensley M.D., Pearson A.W., and Sardeshmukh S.R. The negative consequences of pay dispersion in family and non-family top management teams: an exploratory analysis of new venture, high-growth firms. J Bus Res 60 (2007) 1039-1047 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.012 (this issue)
15. Gersick K., Davis J., McCollom M., and Lansberg I. Generation to Generation (1997), Harvard Business School Press, Boston (MA)
16. Habbershon T., Williams M., and MacMillan I. A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. J Bus Venturing 18 (2003) 451-465
17. Handler W.G. Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Fam Bus Rev 2 3 (1989) 257-276
18. Jaskiewicz P., and Klein S. The impact of goal alignment on board composition and board size in family businesses. J Bus Res 60 (2007) 1080-1089 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.015 (this issue)
19. Karra N., Tracey P., and Phillips N. Altruism and agency in the family firm: exploring the role of family, kinship, and ethnicity. Entrep Theory Pract 30 (2006) 861-877
20. Kellermanns F.W., and Eddleston K.A. A family perspective on when conflict benefits family firm performance. J Bus Res 60 (2007) 1048-1057 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.018 (this issue)
21. Kozlowski S.W., and Klein K.J. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In: Klein K.J., and Kozlowski S.W.J. (Eds). Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (2000), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 3-90
22. Lubatkin M.H., Durand R., and Ling Y. The missing lnk in family firm governance theory: a self-other typology of parental altruism. J Bus Res 60 (2007) 1022-1029 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.019 (this issue)
23. Meglino B.M., and Ravlin E.C. Individual values in organizations: concepts, controversies, and research. J Manage 24 (1998) 351-389
24. Morck R., and Yeung B. Family control and the rent seeking society. Entrep Theory Pract 28 (2004) 391-409
25. Robinson W.S. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. Am Soc Rev 15 (1950) 351-357
26. Rokeach M. The Nature of Human Values (1973), Free Press, New York (NY)
27. Rokeach M. Understanding Human Values: Individual and Societal (1979), The Free Press, New York
28. Schulze W., Lubatkin M., Dino R., and Buchholtz A. Agency relationships in family firms: theory and evidence. Organ Sci 12 (2001) 99-116
29. Sharma P. An overview of the field of family business studies: current status and directions for future. Fam Bus Rev 17 1 (2004) 1-36
30. Sharma P., and Manikutty S. Strategic divestments in family firms: role of family structure and community culture. Entrep Theory Pract 29 3 (2005) 293-311
31. Sharma P., Hoy F., Astrachan J.H., and Koiranen M. The practice-driven evolution of family business education. J Bus Res 60 (2007) 1012-1021 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.010 (this issue)
32. Sirmon D., and Hitt M. Managing resources: linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrep Theory Pract 27 (2003) 339-358
33. Steier L. New venture creation and organization: a familial sub-narrative. J Bus Res 60 (2007) 1099-1107 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.017 (this issue)
34. Thorndike E.L. On the fallacy of imputing the correlations found for groups to the individuals or smaller groups composing them. Am J Psychol 52 (1939) 122-124
35. Zahra S.A., Neubaum D.O., and Larrañeta B. Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: the moderating role of family involvement. J Bus Res 60 (2007) 1070-1079 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.014 (this issue)