Recognizing and fostering creativity in technological design education

International Journal of Technology and Design Education

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 345-358

  Cropley, David ^a   Cropley, Arthur ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Assessment; Creativity; Design; Pedagogy

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT; CREATIVITY; CURRICULUM GUIDELINES; DESIGN EDUCATION; DESIGN PEDAGOGY; PEDAGOGY;

CURRICULA; EDUCATION COMPUTING; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 77956925973     PISSN: 09577572     EISSN: 15731804     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10798-009-9089-5     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013.
2. Amabile, T. M., & Tighe, E. (1993). Questions of creativity. In J. Brockman (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 7-27). New York: Simon and Schuster.
3. Bacon, F. (1899 [1604]). Advancement of learning and Novum Organum. New York: The Colonial Press.
4. Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173-178.
5. Barron, F. X. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
6. Brady, E. B. (1970). The effects of creativity and intelligence on teacher ratings. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, 342-344.
7. Brandau, H., Daghofer, F., Hollerer, L., Kaschnitz, W., Kellner, K., Kirchmair, G., et al. (2007). The relationship between creativity, teacher ratings on behaviour, age, and gender in pupils from seven to ten years. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 91-113.
8. Bruner, J. S. (1962). The conditions of creativity. In H. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to cognition (pp. 1-30). New York: Atherton.
9. Cattell, R. B., & Butcher, H. J. (1968). The prediction of achievement and creativity. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences. New York: Academic Press.
11. Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (pp. 83-114). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
12. Cropley, A. J. (2005). Creativity and problem-solving: Implications for classroom assessment (24th Vernon-Wall Lecture, Glasgow, 6th November 2004). Leicester: British Psychological Society.
13. Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2005). Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Faces of the muse: How people think, work and act creatively in diverse domains (pp. 169-185). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Elements of a universal aesthetic of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 3, 155-161.
15. Cropley, A. J., & Cropley, D. H. (2009). Fostering creativity: A diagnostic approach for higher education and organizations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
16. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A system view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325-339). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Dawson, V. L., D'Andrea, T., Affito, R., & Westby, E. L. (1999). Predicting creative behavior: A reexamination of the divergence between traditional and teacher-defined concepts of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 57-66.
19. Descartes, R. (1991 [1644]). Principles of philosophy (V. R. Miller & R. P. Miller, Trans.) Boston: Kluwer.
20. Dow, G. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Teaching students to solve insight problems: Evidence for domain specificity in creativity training. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 389-402.
21. Fasko, D. (2000-2001). Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 317-328.
22. Feldhusen, J. F., & Treffinger, D. J. (1975). Teachers' attitudes and practices in teaching creativity and problem solving to economically disadvantaged and minority children. Psychological Reports, 37, 1161-1162.
23. Gautier, T. (1998 [1836]). Mademoiselle de Maupin. Paris: Editions bibliopolis.
24. Haller, C. S., Courvoisier, D. S., & Cropley, D. H. (2009). Can functional creativity be objectified? (submitted).
25. Heinelt, G. (1974). Kreative Lehrer/kreative Schüler [Creative teachers/creative students]. Freiburg: Herder.
26. Hennessey, B. A. (1994). The consensual assessment technique: An examination of the relationships between ratings of product and process creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 193-208.
27. Howieson, N. (1984). Is Western Australia neglecting the creative potential of its youth? Paper presented at the 1984 annual conference of the Australian Psychological Society, Perth, August 12-17.
28. Huang, T.-Y. (2005). Fostering creativity: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, A&M University, College Station, TX. Retrieved on January 15, 2008, from http://handle.tamu.edu/1969.1/2338.
29. International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy-content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.
30. Karwowksi, M. (2007). Teachers' nominations of students' creativity: Should we believe them? Are the nominations valid? The Social Sciences, 2, 264-269.
31. Kimbell, R. (2001). Assessment of design and technology. In G. Owen-Jackson (Ed.), Teaching design and technology in secondary schools (pp. 223-234). London: Routledge.
32. Lewis, T. (2005). Creativity-a framework for the design/problem solving discourse in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 17, 35-52.
33. Maier, M. W., & Rechtin, E. (2000). The art of systems architecting (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
34. Maslow, A. H. (1973). Creativity in self-actualizing people. In A. Rothenberg & C. R. Hausman (Eds.), The creative question (pp. 86-92). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
35. Mawson, B. (2003). Beyond "The Design Process": An alternative pedagogy for technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 117-128.
36. May, R. (1976). The courage to create. New York: Bantam.
37. Obuche, N. M. (1986). The ideal pupil as perceived by Nigerian (Igbo) teachers and Torrance's creative personality. International Review of Education, 32, 191-196.
38. Oral, G., & Guncer, B. (1993). Relationship between creativity and nonconformity to school discipline as perceived by teachers of Turkish elementary school children, by controlling for their grade and sex. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 20, 208-214.
39. Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310.
40. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
41. Savransky, S. D. (2000). Engineering of creativity. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
42. Scott, C. L. (1999). Teachers' biases toward creative children. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 321-328.
43. Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361-388.
44. Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum: A propulsion model of kinds of creative contributions. New York: Psychology Press.
45. Tan, A. G. (2003). Student teachers' perceptions of student behaviors for fostering creativity: A perspective on the academically low achievers. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 13, 59-71.
46. Vosburg, S. K. (1998). Mood and quantity and quality of ideas. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 315-324.