Objectives, success and failure factors of housing public-private partnerships in Malaysia

Habitat International

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 150-157

  Abdul Aziz, A R ^a   Jahn Kassim, P S ^a  

^a SCHOOL OF PHYSICS   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Housing development; Malaysia; Public agencies; Public private partnership

Indexed keywords

HOUSING MANAGEMENT; HOUSING PROVISION; PUBLIC SECTOR; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; SOCIAL HOUSING; STATE OWNED ENTERPRISE;

MALAYSIA;

EID: 77956905326     PISSN: 01973975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abdul-Aziz A.-R., Jaafar M., Hussin A.-A. Are government-linked construction companies in Malaysia still valid? The indigenous contractor's perspective. Construction Management and Economics 2007, 25(17-45):1009-1019.
2. Adusumilli U. Partnership approaches in India. Making common ground: Public-private partnerships in land for housing 1999, Intermediate Technology Publications, London. G. Payne (Ed.).
3. Agus, M. R. (1989). New housing policy in Malaysia: Public and private cooperation for the development of low cost housing. Paper presented at the sixth inter-schools conference in development, emerging trends in the third world housing policies: 1990s and beyond, organised by University of Sheffield, March 18th-19th.
4. Agus M.R. The role of state and market in the Malaysian housing sector. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 2002, 17:49-67.
5. Alexandrou, A., & Colpus, C. (2001). Public sector values: The impact of public-private partnerships. Paper presented at the conference of public private partnerships, University of Twente, Hengelo, The Netherlands, 6-9 June.
6. Asaha A. Dasar Pembangunan Tanah Negeri Selangor. Jurnal Tanah 2004, 4(1):29-38.
7. Asenova D., Beck M., Akintoye A., Hardcastle C., Chinyio E. Partnership, value for money and best value in PFI projects: obstacles and opportunities. Public Policy & Administration 2002, 17(4):5-19.
8. Australian Procurement and Construction Council Key issues in procurement through public private partnerships (PPPs) Nov 2002, Discussion paper, APCC, Deakin, Australia, (online), Accessed 08.11.09. http://www.apcc.gov.au/LinkClick.aspx%3Ffileticket=SA988NPQ8K4%3D&tabid=150&mid=496.
9. Awil, A.-U., & Abdul-Aziz, A. R. (2006). Internationalisation of Malaysian housing developers: Case studies from India, South Africa, Cambodia and Australia. Paper presented at the international real estate research symposium (IRERS), Kuala Lumpur, 11-13 April.
10. Bardhan A.D., Barua S.K. Real estate industry: creating value through public-private partnerships. India infrastructure report 2004: Ensuring value for money 2005, 103-114. Oxford University Press, Oxford. S. Morris (Ed.).
11. Brown A., Orr A., Luo J. The suitability of public private partnerships in the provision of sustainable housing in China. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainability Development 2006, 2(1/2):101-125.
12. Choe S.C. The promise and pitfalls of public-private partnerships in Korea. International Social Science Journal 2002, 54(172):253-260.
13. Claggett B., Doukov D., Feiden P. Structuring public-private partnerships for housing development July 1994, International municipal information series report prepared for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). No. 5. Bulgaria (online), Accessed 12.10.09. http://www.usaid.gov/locations/europe-eurasia/local-gov/pdf_docs/imis65.pdf.
14. Coates B. Public housing redevelopment through public private partnerships (PPP) (online), Accessed 04.11.09. http://www.communityhousing.org.au/S5%20conf%20papers%2008/B4%20B%20Coates%20-Public%20housing%20redevelopment%20through%20Public%20Private%20Partnerships%20(%20%5BCompatibility%20Mode%5D.pdf.
15. Cuorato J. Keys to successful public-private partnerships 2002, (online), National Council for Public-Private Partnerships, Accessed 08.09.09. http://ncppporg/howpart/index.shtml.
16. Dewar D. South Africa: two case studies of partnerships in the provision of land for housing. Making common ground: Public-private partnerships in land for housing 1999, 65-89. Intermediate Technology Publications, London. C. Payne (Ed.).
17. Dixon T., Pottinger G., Jordan A. Lessons from the private finance initiatives in the UK: benefits, problems and critical success factors. Journal of Property Investment and Finance 2005, 23(5):412-423.
18. European Commission. (January 2003). Guidelines for successful public private partnerships.
19. Firestone W.A. Alternative arguments for generalising from data, as applied to quantitative research. Educational Researcher 1993, 22(4):16-23.
20. Gallimore P., Williams W., Woodward D. Perceptions of risk in the private finance initiatives. Journal of Property Finance 1997, 8(2):164-176.
21. Gilbertson P. Living communities renewal through partnerships: public private partnerships: what are the risks? What are the benefits? (online), Accessed 27.12.09. http://www.nchf.org.au/downloads/paulgilbertson.pdf.
22. Greene J.C. Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2008, 2(7):7-22.
23. Griffin L. Creating affordable housing in Toronto using public-private partnerships. FES Outstanding Graduate Student Paper Series 2004, 9(2). (online), Accessed 24.12.09. Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University. http://www.yorku.ca/fes/research/students/outstanding/docs/LaraGriffin.pdf.
24. Grimsey D., Lewis M.K. Are public private partnerships value for money? Evaluating alternative approaches and comparing academic and practitioner views. Accounting Forum 2005, 29(4):345-378.
25. Hanif, R., Wan Abdul Aziz, W. N., & Mohd. Aini, A. (2006). Entrepreneur-partnership approach in satisfying the local housing agenda. In International conference of sustainable housing. Universiti Sains Malaysia, 18-19 September.
26. Ho K.L. Malaysia's civil service reform: Mahathir's legacies and Abdullah's challenges. Malaysia: Recent trends and challenges 2006, 195-209. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore. S.-H. Saw, K. Kesavapany (Eds.).
27. Hussin R. Project finance concept (smart partnership): viability of implementation in housing projects with special emphasis in risk management - an academic analysis, viewpoint and framework's proposal. The Malaysian Surveyor 2001, 36(2):23-34.
28. Idrus, N., & Ho, C. S. (2008). Affordable and quality housing through the low cost housing provision in Malaysia. Paper presented at the seminar on sustainable development and governance, organised by Toyohashi University Technology and University Technology Malaysia, at Toyohashi University of Technology, June 26th.
29. Jamaluddin, Z., & Agus, R. (1997). Penswastaan perumahan setinggan: halangan dan kejayaan. Paper presented at the Persidangan Kebangsaan Kajian Sains Sosial, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 29-30 September.
30. Kuala Lumpur City Hall Kuala Lumpur structure plan 2020 2004, KLCH, Kuala Lumpur.
31. Lee, L. M., & Ahmad, M. J. (2000). Local authority networked development approval system. Paper presented at the planning digital conference, organised by Penang State Town and Country Planning Department, Penang, 28-29 March.
32. Leung B.Y.P., Hui E.C.M. Evaluation approach on public-private partnership (PPP) urban redevelopments. International Journal of Strategic Property Management 2005, 9(1):1-16.
33. Lynch J., Brown M., Baker L. Public-private partnerships in transitional land and housing markets: case studies from Bulgaria and Russia. Making common ground: Public-private partnerships in land for housing 1999, 168-192. Intermediate Technology Publications, London. G. Payne (Ed.).
34. Maguire G., Malinovitch A. Development of PPPs in Victoria. Australian Accounting Review 2004, 14(2):27-33.
35. National Audit Chief Laporan Ketua Audit Negara Negeri Sembilan Tahun 2000 2000, National Audit Department, Malaysia.
36. National Audit Chief Laporan Ketua Audit Negara Selangor Tahun 2001 2001, National Audit Department, Malaysia.
37. National Audit Chief Laporan Ketua Audit Negara Negeri Sembilan Tahun 2003 2003, National Audit Department, Malaysia.
38. Ong, H. C., & Lenard, D. (2002). Can private finance be applied in the provision of housing? Paper presented at the FIG XXII international congress, Washington D.C., U.S.A, April 19-26.
39. Payne, G. (2000). The contribution of partnerships to urban development and housing. Paper presented in international forum on cities and management of public housing, Bogota City Hall, Metro Vivienda, 5-9 Oct.
40. Pint E.M., Bondanella J.R., Cave J., Keyser D. Public-private partnerships. Background papers for the US-UK conference on military installation assets, operations and services 2001, Defence Technical Information Centre, (online), Accessed 24.06.06. http://stinet.dtic.mil/oai/oai%3F&verb=getRecord&metadaprefix=html&identifier=ADA396517.
41. Pomeroy, S., Lampert, G., Wallace, J., & Sheehan, R. (1998). The role of public-private partnerships in producing affordable housing: assessment of the U.S experience and lessons for Canada. Research report, prepared for the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
42. Raman M. Housing and the concerns of consumers. Housing the nation: A definitive study 1997, 709-747. Cagamas Berhad, Kuala Lumpur. Cagamas (Ed.).
43. Rondinelli D.A. Partnering for development: government - private sector cooperation in service provision. Reinventing government for the 21st century: State capacity in a globalising society 2003, 219-239. Kumarian Press, Bloomfield, CT. D.A. Rondinelli, G.S. Cheema (Eds.).
44. Salleh G. Bumiputera house ownership and participation and other issues relating to the housing industry. Housing the nation: A definitive study 1997, 297-312. Cagamas Berhad, Kuala Lumpur. Cagamas (Ed.).
45. Savas E.S. Privatisation and public private partnerships 2000, Chatham House, New York.
46. Sengupta U. Government intervention and public-private partnerships in housing delivery in Kolkata. Habitat International 2005, 30(3):448-461.
47. Sieber S.D. The integration of fieldwork and survey methods. American Journal of Sociology 1973, 78:1335-1359.
48. Singaravelloo, K. (2001). Fostering public-private partnership in a win-win situation: The experience of a Malaysian local government. Paper presented at the conference of public private partnerships, University of Twente, Hengelo, The Netherlands, 6-9 June.
49. Susilawati C., Armitage L. Do public private partnerships facilitate affordable housing outcome in Queensland?. Australian Property Journal August 2004, 184-187.
50. Susilawati, C., Armitage, L., & Skitmore, M. (2005). Partnerships in affordable housing: The impact of conflicting investment criteria. Paper presented at the QUT research week in conjunction to RICS COBRA conference, AUBEA conference and 3rd international symposium CIB student chapters, Brisbane, 4th-8th July.
51. Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches 1998, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
52. The Times of India Online City all set for a massive housing stock (online), Accessed 02.04.08. http://www.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-845202.prtpage-1.cms.
53. Thomas H. The local press and urban renewal: a South Wales case study. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2009, 18(2):315-333.
54. Wan Abdul Aziz W.N.A., Hanif N.R. Business partnership in meeting housing needs of the urban poor. Global Business and Economic Review (GBER) 2005, 5(2):39-48.
55. Webb R., Pulle B. Public private partnerships: An introduction 2002, Research paper no. 1 2002-03, Information and Research Services, Department of the Parliamentary Library, Canberra.
56. Zhang, Y. (1996). Wills and ways: Policy dynamics of HOPE VI from 1992-2002. Unpublished PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.