Perspectives: Teams wont solve this problem

Human Factors

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 329-334

  Dechurch, Leslie A ^a   Zaccaro, Stephen J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

effort motivation; emergence; multiteam system; organizational behavior design; psychological states; sociotechnical systems; team; team training

Indexed keywords

EFFORT/MOTIVATION; EMERGENCE; MULTITEAM SYSTEM; ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR/DESIGN; PSYCHOLOGICAL STATE; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; TEAM; TEAM TRAINING;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; LENSES; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS; RESEARCH;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

ARTICLE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; METHODOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; SYSTEMS THEORY; TECHNOLOGY;

GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; SYSTEMS THEORY; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 77956820987     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: 15478181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018720810374736     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Agarwal, R., Croson, R., & Mahoney, J.T. (2010). The role of incentives and communication in strategic alliances: An experimental investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 413-437.
2. Brewer, M.B., & Pierce, K.P. (2005). Social identity complexity and outgroup tolerance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 428-437.
3. Cobb, M.G., & Mathieu, J.E. (2003, April). The impact of training and environmental complexity on the effectiveness of multi-team systems. In J. E. Mathieu (Chair). Investigations of multi-team systems. A symposium presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
4. Davison, R.B., & Hollenbeck, J.R. (in press). Boundary spanning in MTSs. In S. J. Zaccaro, M.A. Marks, & L. A. DeChurch (Eds.), Multiteam systems: An organizational form for dynamic and complex environments. New York: Taylor & Francis.
5. DeChurch, L.A., Burke, C.S., Shuffler, M., Lyons, R., Doty, D., & Salas, E. (in press). A historiometric analysis of leadership in mission critical multiteam environments. Leadership Quarterly.
6. DeChurch, L.A. & Marks, M.A. (2006). Leadership in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 311-329.
7. DeChurch, L.A., & Mathieu, J.E. (2009). Thinking in terms of multiteam systems. In E. Salas, G. F. Goodwin, & C. S. Burke (eds.), Team Effectiveness in Complex Organizations: Cross-disciplinary Perspectives and Approaches, pp. 267-292. New York: Taylor & Francis.
8. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
9. Hogg, M.A., & Terry, D.J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140.
10. Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Leidner, D.E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791-815.
11. Kanfer, R., Ackerman, P., Murtha, T.C., Dugdale, B., & Nelson, L. (1994). Goal setting, conditions of practice, and task performance: A resource allocation perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 826-835.
12. Kozlowski, S.W.J., & Ilgen, D.R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77-124.
13. Kozlowski, S.W.J., & Klein, K.J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14. Liu, Y., & Simaan, M.A. (2005). Non-inferior Nash strategies for routing control in parallel-link communication networks. International Journal of Communications Systems, 18, 347-361. (Pubitemid 40654641)
15. Marks, M.A., DeChurch, L.A., Mathieu, J.E., Panzer, F.J., & Alonso, A.A. (2005). Teamwork in multi-team systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 964-971.
16. Marks, M.A., Mathieu, J.E., & Zaccaro, S.J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
17. Mathieu, J.E., Marks, M.A., & Zaccaro, S.J. (2000). Multiteam systems. In N. Anderson, D. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), International handbook of work and organizational psychology (pp. 289-313). London, England: Sage.
18. Mathieu, J., Maynard, M.T., Rapp, T.L., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410-476.
19. Mesmer-Magnus, J.R., & DeChurch, L.A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535-546.
20. Saavedra, R., Earley, P.C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61-72.
21. Salas, E., Dickinson, T.L., Converse, S.A., & Tannenbaum, S.L. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3-29). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
22. Sherif, M., Harvey, O.J., White, B.J., Hood, W.R., & Sherif, C.W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers cave experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.
23. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
24. Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180.
25. Zaccaro, S.J., & DeChurch, L.A. (in press). Leadership forms and functions in multiteam systems. In S. J. Zaccaro, M. A. Marks, & L. A. DeChurch (Eds.), Multiteam systems: An organizational form for dynamic and complex environments. New York: Taylor & Francis.
26. Zaccaro, S. J., Marks, M. A., & DeChurch, L. A. (Eds.). (in press). Multiteam systems: An organizational form for dynamic and complex environments. New York: Taylor & Francis.