The use of outcome measures relating to the knee

Orthopaedics and Trauma

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 309-316

  Beard, David J ^a   Knezevic, Kristina ^a   Al Ali, Sami ^a   Dawson, Jill ^b   Price, Andrew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Health status; Knee; Outcome measures; Psychometrics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; CARTILAGE INJURY; HUMAN; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE LIGAMENT INJURY; KNEE MENISCUS RUPTURE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDITY;

EID: 77956817498     PISSN: 18771327     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mporth.2010.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Fitzpatrick R., Davey C., Buxton M., Jones D. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998, 2:1-74.
2. Slevin M.L., Plant H., Lynch D., Drinkwater J., Gregory W.M. Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?. Br J Cancer 1988, 57:109-112.
3. Garratt A., Schmidt L., Mackintosh A., Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ 2002, 324:1417.
4. Davies A.P. Rating systems for total knee replacement. Knee 2002, 9:261-266.
5. Streiner D., Norman R. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use 2008, Oxford University Press, pp. 431. 4thedn.
6. AERA, APA, NCME Standards for educational and psychological testing 1999, American Educational Research Association, Washington, pp. 194.
7. Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16:297-334.
8. Wright J.G., Young N.L. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 1997, 50:239-246.
9. Beaton D.E. Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. Spine 2000, 25:3192-3199.
10. Terwee C.B., Dekker F.W., Wiersinga W.M., Prummel M.F., Bossuyt P.M. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res 2003, 12:349-362.
11. Terwee C.B., Bot S.D., de Boer M.R., et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60:34-42.
12. Dawson J., Doll H., Boller I., et al. Comparative responsiveness and minimal change for the Oxford Elbow Score following surgery. Qual Life Res 2008, 17:1257-1267.
13. Jackowski D., Guyatt G. A guide to health measurement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 413:80-89.
14. A knee function assessment chart. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1978, 60-B:308-309. From the British Orthopaedic Association Research Sub-Committee.
15. Garratt A.M., Klaber Moffett J., Farrin A.J. Responsiveness of generic and specific measures of health outcome in low back pain. Spine 2001, 26:71-77. discussion 7.
16. Dieppe P.A. Recommended methodology for assessing the progression of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee joints. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1995, 3:73-77.
17. Ranawat C.S., Insall J., Shine J. Duo-condylar knee arthroplasty: hospital for special surgery design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976, 120:76-82.
18. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., Scott W.N. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248:13-14.
19. Veenhof C., Bijlsma J.W., van den Ende C.H., van Dijk G.M., Pisters M.F., Dekker J. Psychometric evaluation of osteoarthritis questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Arthritis Rheum 2006, 55:480-492.
20. Garratt A.M., Brealey S., Gillespie W.J. Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: a structured review. Rheumatology 2004, 43:1414-1423.
21. Pynsent P.B., Fairbank J.C.T., Carr A.J. Outcome measures in orthopaedics and orthopaedic trauma 2004, Arnold, London, pp. 381. 2nd edn.
22. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Murray D., Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80:63-69.
23. Murray D.W., Fitzpatrick R., Rogers K., et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89-B:1010-1014.
24. Dunbar M.J., Robertsson O., Ryd L., Lidgren L. Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of a survey of 3600 patients from The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001, 83:339-344.
25. Ware J., Kosinski M., Keller S.D. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996, 34:220-233.
26. DH/NHS Finance Performance and Operations The NHS in England: the operating framework for 2008/09 2007, Department of Health.
27. EuroQol. A new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 1990, 16(3):199-208.
28. Rees J.L., Dawson J., Hand G.C., et al. The use of PROM's and patient satisfaction ratings to assess outcome in elective orthopaedic surgery. BESS 2009 2009, University College London.
29. Bellamy N., Kirwan J., Boers M. Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. J Rheumatol 1997, 24:799-802.
30. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., Campbell J., Stitt L.W. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833-1840.
31. Roos E.M., Roos H.P., Lohmander L.S., Ekdahl C., Beynnon B.D. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998, 28:88-96.
32. Roos E.M., Roos H.P., Ekdahl C., Lohmander L.S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1998, 8:439-448.
33. Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992, 30:473-483.
34. Dougados M., Hawker G., Lohmander S., et al. OARSI/OMERACT criteria of being considered a candidate for total joint replacement in knee/hip osteoarthritis as an endpoint in clinical trials evaluating potential disease modifying osteoarthritic drugs. J Rheumatol 2009, 36:2097-2099.
35. Perruccio A.V., Stefan Lohmander L., Canizares M., et al. The development of a short measure of physical function for knee OA KOOS-Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS) - an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008, 16:542-550.
36. Hawker G.A., Davis A.M., French M.R., et al. Development and preliminary psychometric testing of a new OA pain measure - an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008, 16:409-414.
37. Irrgang J.J., Snyder-Mackler L., Wainner R.S., Fu F.H., Harner C.D. Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998, 80:1132-1145.
38. Lysholm J., Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 1982, 10:150-154.
39. Tegner Y., Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985, 198:42-49.
40. Briggs K.K., Lysholm J., Tegner Y., Rodkey W.G., Kocher M.S., Steadman J.R. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med 2009, 37:890-897.
41. Hefti F., Muller W., Jakob R.P., Staubli H.U. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1993, 1:226-234.
42. Briggs K.K., Kocher M.S., Rodkey W.G., Steadman J.R. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale for patients with meniscal injury of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88:698-705.
43. Crawford K., Briggs K.K., Rodkey W.G., Steadman J.R. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the IKDC score for meniscus injuries of the knee. Arthroscopy 2007, 23:839-844.
44. Kirkley A., Griffin S., Whelan D. The development and validation of a quality of life-measurement tool for patients with meniscal pathology: the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET). Clin J Sport Med 2007, 17:349-356.
45. van den Borne M.P., Raijmakers N.J., Vanlauwe J., et al. International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) and Oswestry macroscopic cartilage evaluation scores validated for use in Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) and microfracture. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007, 15:1397-1402.
46. Greco NJ, Anderson AF, Mann BJ, et al. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in comparison to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Short Form 36 in patients with focal art. Am J Sports Med, published online before print December 31, 2009, doi:10.1177/0363546509354163.
47. Bekkers J.E., de Windt T.S., Raijmakers N.J., Dhert W.J., Saris D.B. Validation of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for the treatment of focal cartilage lesions. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009, 17:1434-1439.
48. Smith H.J., Richardson J.B., Tennant A. Modification and validation of the Lysholm Knee Scale to assess articular cartilage damage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009, 17:53-58.
49. Bergner M., Bobbitt R.A., Carter W.B., Gilson B.S. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981, 19(8):787-805.
50. Hunt S.M., McKenna S.P., McEwan J., Backett E.M., Williams J., Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1980, 34(4):281-286.
51. Ware JE, Kosinski M. The SF-36 health survey (version 2.0) technical note. Boston: Health Assessment Lab, 1996 (updated 1997).