Communication and social competencies in medical education in German-speaking countries: The Basel Consensus Statement. Results of a Delphi Survey

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 259-266

  Kiessling, Claudia ^a   Dieterich, Anja ^b   Fabry, Götz ^c   Hölzer, Henrike ^d   Langewitz, Wolf ^e   Mühlinghaus, Isabel ^d   Pruskil, Susanne ^d   Scheffer, Simone ^d   Schubert, Sebastian ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b WZB BERLIN SOCIAL SCIENCE CENTER   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^d CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Communication skills; Consensus methods; Delphi Survey; Medical education; Objectives; Outcomes; Social competencies

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRIA; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; GERMANY; LANGUAGE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; PERSONALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONALISM; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL COMPETENCE; SWITZERLAND; TEAMWORK; WORKSHOP;

AUSTRIA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION; COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCES AS TOPIC; CURRICULUM; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; GERMANY; HUMANS; PILOT PROJECTS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; SWITZERLAND;

EID: 77956767831     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.017     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's doctors. Recommendations on undergraduate medical education. General Medical Council; 2003.
2. The CanMEDS physician competency framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better care 2005, The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa. J.R. Frank (Ed.).
3. ACGME. Outcome project. Enhancing residency education through outcome assessment. [accessed 19.1.2009]. http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/GeneralCompetenciesStandards21307.pdf.
4. Metz JCM, Verbeek-Weel AMM, Huisjes HJ, editors. Blueprint 2001. Training of doctors in the Netherlands. [accessed 19.1.2009]. http://www.nfu.nl/fileadmin/documents/BLUEPRINT-Training-of-doctors.pdf.
5. Berliner Kommunique 2003. " Den Europäischen Hochschulraum verwirklichen" Kommuniqué der Konferenz der europäischen Hochschulministerinnen und -minister am 19. September 2003 in Berlin (accessed 19.1.2009). http://www.bmbf.de/de/3336.php.
6. Working Group under a Mandate of the Joint Commission of the Swiss Medical Schools. Swiss catalogue of learning objectives for undergraduate medical training - June 2008. [accessed 19.1.2009]. http://sclo.smifk.ch/.
7. Cumming A, Ross M. On behalf of the Tuning Project (Medicine) Steering Group and Task Force 1 of the MEDINE Thematic Network. The tuning learning outcomes/competences for primary medical degrees in Europe. Edinburgh; 2008. [accessed 19.1.2009]. http://www.bris.ac.uk/medine/docs/competences.pdf.
8. BVMD. Kerncurriculum für die medizinische Ausbildung in Deutschland. Ein Vorschlag der Medizinstudierenden Deutschlands; 2006. [accessed 19.1.2009]. http://bvmd.de/fileadmin/SCOME/Kerncurriculum/Kerncurriculum.pdf.
9. IMFSA, EMSA. European core curriculum - the students' perspective. Bristol (UK); 2006. [accessed 19.1.2009]. http://bvmd.de/fileadmin/SCOME/Kerncurriculum/EuropeanCoreCurriculum.pdf.
10. Simpson M., Buchman R., Stewart M., Maguire P., Lipkin M., Novack D., et al. Doctor-patient communication: the Toronto consensus statement. Brit Med J 1991, 303:1385-1387.
11. Participants in the Bayer-Fetzer conference on physician-patient communication in medical education. Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement. Acad Med 2001;76:390-3.
12. Hammick M., Haig A. The Best Evidence Medical Education Collaboration: processes, products and principles. Clin Teach 2007, 4:42-45.
13. Fink A., Kosecoff J., Chassin M., Brook R.H. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 1984, 74(9):979-983.
14. Jones J., Hunter D. Qualitative research: consensus methods for medical and health services research. Brit Med J 1995, 311:376-380.
15. Murphy M.K., Black N.A., Lamping D.L., McKee C.M., Sanderson C.F.B., Askham J., et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Asses 1998, 2(3).
16. Graham B., Regehr G., Wright J.G. Delphi as a method for diagnostic criteria. J Clin Epidemiol 2003, 56:1150-1156.
17. AWMF. Erarbeitung von Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie. Methodische Empfehlungen (" Leitlinie für Leitlinien" , Stand Dez. 2004). [accessed 19.1.2009]. http://www.awmf.de/.
18. AWMF. Deutsches Instrument zur methodischen Leitlinien-Bewertung (DELBI) Fassung 2005/2006. [accessed 19.1.2009]. http://www.delbi.de/.
19. Dalkey NC. The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion. Prepared for United States Air Force Project RAND. Santa Monica; 1969.
20. Aichholzer G. Das ExpertInnen-Delphi: Methodische Grundlagen und Anwendungsfeld " Technology Foresight" ITA Manuskript (ITA-02-01); 2002.
21. Bowler N. The Delphi technique. Nurs Stand 1999, 13:32-36.
22. De Villiers M.R., de Villiers P.J.T., Kent A.P. The Delphi technique in health science education. Med Teach 2005, 27:639-643.
23. Häder M, Rexroth M. Erfassung kognitiver Aspekte des Antwortverhaltens in einer Delphi-Studie. ZUMA Arbeitsbericht 98/06. Mannheim; 1998.
24. Häder M. Die Expertenauswahl bei Delphi-Befragungen. ZUMA How-To-Reihe Nr. 5. Mannheim; 2000.
25. Stewart J. Is the Delphi technique a qualitative method?. Med Educ 2001, 35:922-923.
26. Lloyd-Jones G., Fowell S., Bligh J.G. The use of the nominal group technique as an evaluation tool in medical undergraduate education. Med Educ 1999, 33:8-13.
27. Dunham RB. Nomina group technique. A users' guide. University of Wisconsin ohne Jahr. [accessed 19.1.2009]. http://instruction.bus.wisc.edu/obdemo/readings/ngt.html.
28. Bloom B.S., Krathwohl D.R. Taxonomy of educational objectives book 1: cognitive domain 1984, Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Boston.
29. Isaacs G. Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Australia: Teaching and Educational Development Institute, University of Queensland; 1996 [accessed 19.1.2009]. http://www.tedi.uq.edu.au/downloads/Bloom.pdf.
30. Krathwohl D.R. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: an overview. Theor Pract 2002, 41:212-218.
31. Bensing J., van Dulmen S., Bensing K.T., et al. Communication in context: new directions in communication research. Patient Educ Couns 2003, 50:27-32.
32. Von Fragstein M., Silverman J., Cushing A., Quilligan S., Salisbury H., Wiskin C. UK consensus statement on the content of communication curricula in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ 2008, 42:1100-1107.
33. Gale R., Grant J. AMEE medical education guide no. 10: managing change in a medical context: guidelines for action. Med Teach 1997, 9:239-249.