Webs in vitro and in vivo: Spiders alter their orb-web spinning behavior in the laboratory

Journal of Arachnology

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 183-191

  Sensenig, Andrew ^a   Agnarsson, Ingi ^a,b   Gondek, Taylor M ^a   Blackledge, Todd A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO   (Puerto Rico)

Author keywords

behavioral plasticity; Foraging; silk investment; silk thread size; web architecture

Indexed keywords

ARANEAE; ARANEIDAE; HEXAPODA; LARINIOIDES CORNUTUS;

EID: 77956712223     PISSN: 01618202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1636/Hi09-34.1     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Agnarsson, I. & T.A. Blackledge. 2009. Can a spider web be too sticky? Tensile mechanics constrains the evolution of capture spiral stickiness in orb weaving spiders. Journal of Zoology (London) 278:134-140.
2. Rhisiart, A. & F. Vollrath. 1994. Design features of the orb web of the spider, Araneus diadematus. Behavioral Ecology 5:280-287.
3. Blackledge, T.A. 1998. Stabilimentum variation and foraging success in Argiope aurantia and Argiope trifasciata (Araneae: Araneidae). Journal of Zoology (London) 246:21-27.
4. Blackledge, T.A., G.J. Binford & R.G. Gillespie. 2003. Resource use within a community of Hawaiian spiders (Araneae: Tetragnathidae). Annales Zoologici Fennici 40:293-303.
5. Blackledge, T.A., R.A. Cardullo & C.Y. Hayashi. 2005. Polarized light microscopy, variability in spider silk diameters, and the mechanical characterization of spider silk. Invertebrate Biology 124:165-173.
6. Blackledge, T.A. & C.M. Eliason. 2007. Functionally independent components of prey capture are architecturally constrained in spider orb webs. Biology Letters 3:456-458.
7. Blackledge, T.A. & R.G. Gillespie. 2002. Estimation of capture areas of spider webs in relation to web asymmetry. Journal of Arachnology 30:70-77.
8. Blackledge, T.A. & C.Y. Hayashi. 2006. Silken toolkits: biomechanics of silk fibers spun by the orb web spider Argiope argentata. Journal of Experimental Biology 209:2452-2461.
9. Blackledge, T.A. & J.W. Wenzel. 2001. State-determinate foraging decisions and web architecture in the spider Dictyna volucripes (Araneae, Dictynidae). Ethology Ecology & Evolution 13:105-113.
10. Blackledge, T.A. & J.M. Zevenbergen. 2006. Mesh width influences prey retention in spider orb webs. Ethology 112:1194-1201.
11. Blackledge, T.A. & J.M. Zevenbergen. 2007. Condition dependent spider web architecture in the western black widow Latrodectus hesperus. Animal Behaviour 73:855-864.
12. Boutry, C. & T.A. Blackledge. 2008. The common house spider alters the material and mechanical properties of cobweb silk in response to different prey. Journal of Experimental Zoology 309A:542-552.
13. Brandwood, A. 1985. Mechanical properties and factors of safety of spider drag-lines. Journal of Experimental Biology 116:141-151.
14. Brown, K.M. 1981. Foraging ecology and niche partitioning in orbweaving spiders. Oecologia 50:380-385.
15. Burgess, J.W. & G.W. Uetz. 1982. Social spacing strategies in spiders. Pp. 317-351. In Spider Communication: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance. (P.N. Witt & J.S. Rovner, eds.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
16. Chmiel, K., M.E. Herberstein & M.A. Elgar. 2000. Web damage and feeding experience influence web site tenacity in the orb-web spider Argiope keyserlingi Karsch. Animal Behaviour 60:821-826.
17. Eberhard, W.G. 1971. The ecology of the web of Uloborus diversus (Araneae-Uloboridae). Oecologia 6:328-342.
18. Eberhard, W.G. 1986. Web-building behavior of anapid, symphytognathid and mysmenid spiders (Araneae). Journal of Arachnology 14:339-356.
19. Eberhard, W.G. 1990. Function and phylogeny of spider webs. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21:341-372.
20. Foelix, R.F. 1996. Biology of Spiders. Second edition. Oxford University Press, New York.
21. Gillespie, R.G. & T. Caraco. 1987. Risk-sensitive foraging strategies of two spider populations. Ecology 68:887-899.
22. Heiling, A.M. 1999. Why do nocturnal orb-web spiders (Araneidae) search for light? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 46:43-49.
23. Heiling, A.M. 2004. Effect of spider position on prey capture success and orb-web design. Acta Zoologica Sinica 50:554-565.
24. Heiling, A.M. & M.E. Herberstein. 1999. The importance of being larger: Intraspecific competition for prime web sites in orb-web spiders (Araneae, Araneidae). Behaviour 136:669-677.
25. Heiling, A.M. & M.E. Herberstein. 2000. Interpretations of orb-web variability: A review of past and current ideas. Ekologia-Bratislava 19:97-106.
26. Henschel, J.R. & Y.D. Lubin. 1992. Environmental factors affecting the web and activity of a psammophilous spider in the Namib Desert. Journal of Arid Environments 22:173-189.
27. Herberstein, M.E., C.L. Craig & M.A. Elgar. 1997. Optimal foraging behaviour: web investment and web decorations in Argiope keyserlingi. [Abstract]. Advances in Ethology 32:185.
28. Herberstein, M.E., A.C. Gaskett, D. Glencross, S. Hart, S. Jaensch & M.A. Elgar. 2000. Does the presence of potential prey affect web design in Argiope keyserlingi (Araneae, Araneidae)? Journal of Arachnology 28:346-350.
29. Herberstein, M.E. & A.M. Heiling. 1998. Does mesh height influence prey length in orb-web spiders (Araneae)? European Journal of Entomology 95:367-371.
30. Herberstein, M.E. & A.M. Heiling. 1999. Asymmetry in spider orb webs: a result of physical constraints? Animal Behaviour 58:1241-1246.
31. Herberstein, M.E. & I.M. Tso. 2000. Evaluation of formulae to estimate the capture area and mesh height of orb webs (Araneoidea, Araneae). Journal of Arachnology 28:180-184.
32. Higgins, L.E. 1995. Direct evidence for trade-offs between foraging and growth in a juvenile spider. Journal of Arachnology 23:37-43.
33. Higgins, L.E. & R.E. Buskirk. 1992. A trap-building predator exhibits different tactics for different aspects of foraging behavior. Animal Behaviour 44:485-499.
34. Higgins, L.E., M.A. Townley, E.K. Tillinghast & M.A. Rankin. 2001. Variation in the chemical composition of orb webs built by the spider Nephila clavipes (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). Journal of Arachnology 29:82-94.
35. Jakob, E.M., S.D. Marshall & G.W. Uetz. 1996. Estimating fitness: a comparison of body condition indices. Oikos 77:61-67.
36. Kawamoto, T.H. & H.F. Japyassu. 2008. Tenacity and silk investment of two orb weavers: considerations about diversification of the Araneoidea. Journal of Arachnology 36:418-424.
37. Krink, T. & F. Vollrath. 1997. Analysing spider web-building behaviour with rule-based simulations and genetic algorithms. Journal of Theoretical Biology 185:321-331.
38. Krink, T. & F. Vollrath. 2000. Optimal area use in orb webs of the spider Araneus diadematus. Naturwissenschaften 87:90-93.
39. Kuntner, M., J.A. Coddington & G. Hormiga. 2008. Phylogeny of extant nephilid orb-weaving spiders (Araneae, Nephilidae): testing morphological and ethological homologies. Cladistics 24:147-217.
40. Langer, R.M. & W. Eberhard. 1969. Laboratory photography of spider silk. American Zoologist 9:97-101.
41. Leborgne, R. & A. Pasquet. 1987. Influences of aggregative behavior on space occupation in the spider Zygiella x-notata (Clerck). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 20:203-208.
42. Lin, L.H., D.T. Edmonds & F. Vollrath. 1995. Structural engineering of an orb-spider's web. Nature 373:146-148.
43. Lubin, Y., M. Kotzman & S. Ellner. 1991. Ontogenetic and seasonal changes in webs and websites of a desert widow spider. Journal of Arachnology 19:40-48.
44. Mark, A.T., T.B. David, S.G. Kathleen & K.T. Edward. 1991. Comparative study of orb web hygroscopicity and adhesive spiral composition in three araneid spiders. Journal of Experimental Zoology 259:154-165.
45. Masters, W.M. & A.J.M. Moffet. 1983. A functional explanation of top-bottom asymmetry in vertical orb webs. Animal Behaviour 31:1043-1046.
46. Nakata,K. 2007. Prey detectionwithout successful capture affects spider's orb-web building behaviour. Naturwissenschaften 94:853-857.
47. Nakata, K. & A. Ushimaru. 1999. Feeding experience affects web relocation and investment in web threads in an orb-web spider, Cyclosa argenteoalba. Animal Behaviour 57:1251-1255.
48. Nakata, K. & A. Ushimaru. 2004. Difference in web construction behavior at newly occupied web sites between two Cyclosa species. Ethology 110:397-411.
49. Nentwig, W. 1985. Top-bottom asymmetry in vertical orbwebs: A functional explanation and attendant complications. Oecologia 67:111-112.
50. Opell, B.D. & M.L. Hendricks. 2007. Adhesive recruitment by the viscous capture threads of araneoid orb-weaving spiders. Journal of Experimental Biology 210:553-560.
51. Opell, B.D., B.J. Markley, C.D. Hannum & M.L. Hendricks. 2008. The contribution of axial fiber extensibility to the adhesion of viscous capture threads spun by orb-weaving spiders. Journal of Experimental Biology 211:2243-2251.
52. Opell, B.D. & H.S. Schwend. 2008. Persistent stickiness of viscous capture threads produced by araneoid orb-weaving spiders. Journal of Experimental Zoology 309A:11-16.
53. Ortlepp, C. & J.M. Gosline. 2008. The scaling of safety factor in spider draglines. Journal of Experimental Biology 211:2832-2840.
54. Osaki, S. 1996. Spider silk as mechanical lifeline. Nature 384:419.
55. Pasquet, A., A. Ridwan & R. Leborgne. 1994. Presence of potential prey affects web building in an orb-weaving spider Zygiella xnotata. Animal Behaviour 47:477-480.
56. Rasband, W.S. 1997-2009. ImageJ. U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
57. Riechert, S.E. & R.G. Gillespie. 1986. Habitat choice and utilization in web-building spiders. Pp. 23-48. In Spiders: Webs, Behavior, and Evolution. (W.A. Shear, ed.). Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
58. Sandoval, C.P. 1994. Plasticity in web design in the spider Parawixia bistriata - a response to variable prey type. Functional Ecology 8:701-707.
59. Schneider, J.M. & F. Vollrath. 1998. The effect of prey type on the geometry of the capture web of Araneus diadematus. Naturwissenschaften 85:391-394.
60. Segoli, M., A. Maklakov, E. Gavish, I. Tsurim & Y. Lubin. 2004. The effect of previous foraging success on web-building behaviour in the sheet-web spider, Frontinellina cf. frutetorum (Araneae Linyphiidae). Ethology Ecology & Evolution 16:291-298.
61. Shear, W.A. (ed.). 1986. Spiders: Webs, Behavior, and Evolution. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
62. Sherman, P.M. 1994. The orb web - an energetic and behavioral estimator of a spiders dynamic foraging and reproductive strategies. Animal Behaviour 48:19-34.
63. Tso, I.M., S.Y. Jiang & T.A. Blackledge. 2007. Does the giant wood spider Nephila pilipes respond to prey variation by altering web or silk properties? Ethology 113:324-333.
64. Turnbull, A.L. 1964. The search for prey by a web-building spider Achaearanea tepidariorum (C. L. Koch) (Araneae, Theridiidae). Canadian Entomologist 96:568-579.
65. Vollrath, F. 1992. Spider webs and silks. Scientific American 266:70-76.
66. Ward, D. & Y. Lubin. 1992. Temporal and spatial segregation of web-building in a community of orb-weaving spiders. Journal of Arachnology 20:73-87.
67. Wirth, E. & F.G. Barth. 1992. Forces in the spider orb web. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 171:359-371.
68. Zevenbergen, J.M., N.K. Schneider & T.A. Blackledge. 2008. Fine dining or fortress? Functional shifts in spider web architecture by the western black widow Latrodectus hesperus. Animal Behaviour 76:823-829.
69. Zschokke, S. 1997. Factors influencing the size of the orb web in Araneus diadematus. Pp. 329-334. In Proceedings of the 16th European Colloquium of Arachnology. (M. Zabka, ed.). Wyzsza Szkola Rolnicko-Pedagogiczna, Siedlce, Poland.
70. Zschokke, S. & M.E. Herberstein. 2005. Laboratory methods for maintaining and studying web-building spiders. Journal of Arachnology 33:205-213.