Effects of technical innovation on market value of the U.S. semiconductor industry

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 77, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1322-1338

  Lou, Chen Chi ^a   Lee, Tsung Pei ^b   Gong, Shang Chi ^b   Lin, Shu Ling ^c  

^a CHING YUN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b FU JEN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Average Process Technology; Market value; Semiconductor industry; Technical innovation

Indexed keywords

EXPLANATORY VARIABLES; FABLESS; MAJOR FACTORS; MARKET VALUES; POSITIVE EFFECTS; PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES; PRODUCTS AND SERVICES; PROPORTIONAL CHANGE; PROXY VARIABLES; REGRESSION MODEL; SECURITIES MARKET; SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY; TECHNICAL INNOVATION;

COMMERCE; INDUSTRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE MANUFACTURE;

INNOVATION;

FIRM SIZE; INNOVATION; INVESTMENT; MARKET CONDITIONS; PRODUCTIVITY; SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 77956690835     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.016     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Wong P.K., Mathews J. Competitive strategies of Asian high-tech firms: the challenge of late-industrialization. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 2006, 29(1/2):1-5.
2. Megna P., Klock M. The impact of intangible capital on Tobin's Q in the semiconductor industry. Am. Econ. Rev. 1993, 83(2):265-269.
3. Park G., Park Y. On the measurement of patent stock as knowledge indicators. Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change 2006, 73(7):793-812.
4. West J., Iansiti M. Experience, experimentation, and the accumulation of knowledge: the evolution of R&D in the semiconductor industry. Res. Policy 2003, 32(5):809-825.
5. Leiblein M.J., Reuer J. Building a foreign sales base: the roles of capabilities and alliances for entrepreneurial firms. J. Bus. Venturing 2004, 19(2):285-307.
6. Cornell B. Is the response of analysts to information consistent with fundamental valuation? The case of Intel. Financ. Manage. 2001, 30(1):113-136.
7. Yoffie D.B., Kwak M. Playing by the rules: how Intel avoids antitrust litigation. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2001, 79(6):119-122.
8. Tennenhouse D. Intel's open collaborative model of industry-university research. Res. Technol. Manage. 2004, 47(4):19-26.
9. Aizcorbe A. Moore's Law, competition, and Intel's productivity in the mid-1990s. Am. Econ. Rev. 2005, 95(2):305-308.
10. Mody A., Wheeler D. Technological evolution of the semiconductor industry. Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change 1986, 30(3):197-205.
11. Tassey G. Structural change and competitiveness: the U.S. semiconductor industry. Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change 1990, 37(1):85-93.
12. ÓhUallacháin B. Restructuring the American semiconductor industry: vertical integration of design houses and wafer fabricators. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 1997, 87(2):217-223.
13. Arita T., McCann P. Industrial alliances and firm location behavior: some evidence from the US semiconductor industry. Appl. Econ. 2000, 32(11):1391-1403.
14. Holbrook D., Cohen W.M., Hounshell D.A. The nature, sources, and consequences of firm differences in the early history of the semiconductor industry. Strateg. Manage. J. 2000, 21(10/11):1017-1041.
15. Spencer W.J. New challenges for US semiconductor industry. Issues in Sci. Technol. 2004, 20(2):79-86.
16. Walsh S.T., Boylan R.L., McDermott C. The semiconductor silicon industry roadmap: epochs driven by the dynamics between disruptive technologies and core competencies. Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change 2005, 72(2):213-236.
17. Ketelhöhn N.W. The role of clusters as sources of dynamic externalities in the US semiconductor industry. J. Econ. Geogr. 2006, 6(5):679-699.
18. Narula R., Hagedoorn J. Innovating through strategic alliances: moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements. Technovation 1999, 19(5):283-294.
19. Das T.K., Teng B.S. A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. J. Manage. 2000, 26(1):31-61.
20. Chen C.J. The effects of knowledge attributes, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance. R&D Manage. 2004, 34(3):311-321.
21. Yasuda H., Iijima J. Linkage between strategic alliances and firm's business strategy: the case of the semiconductor industry. Technovation 2005, 25(5):513-521.
22. Chen C.J., Wu W.Y. A comparative study of the alliance experiences between US and Taiwanese firms. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 2005, 29(1/2):136-151.
23. Tobin J. A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. J. Money, Credit, Bank. 1969, 1(1):15-29.
24. Hirschey M. Market structure and market value. J. Bus. 1985, 58(1):89-98.
25. Chung K.H., Jo H. The impact of security analysts' monitoring and marketing functions on the market value of firms. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 1996, 31(4):493-512.
26. Shane H., Klock M. The relation between patent citations and Tobin's Q in the semiconductor industry. Rev. Quant. Finan. Acc. 1997, 9(2):131-136.
27. Allayannis G., Weston J.P. The use of foreign currency derivatives and firm market value. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2001, 14(1):243-276.
28. Bai C.E., Liu Q., Song F.M., Zhang J. Corporate governance and market valuation in China. J. Comp. Econ. 2004, 32(4):599-616.
29. Chin C., Lee P., Chi H.T. Patent citation, R&D spillover, and Tobin's Q: evidence from Taiwan semiconductor industry. Rev. Quant. Finan. Acc. 2006, 26(1):67-84.
30. Hall B.H., Oriani R. Does the market value R&D investment by European firms? Evidence from a panel of manufacturing firms in France, German, and Italy. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 2006, 24(5):971-993.
31. Chauvin K.W., Hirschey M. Advertising, R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm. Financ. Manage. 2001, 22(4):128-140.
32. Yang C.H., Chen J.R. Innovation and market value in newly industrialized countries: the case of Taiwanese electronics firms. Asian Econ. J. 2003, 17(2):205-220.
33. Churyk N.T. Reporting goodwill: are the new accounting standards consistent with market valuation?. J. Bus. Res. 2005, 58(10):1353-1361.
34. Gopalakrishnan S., Damanpour F. A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management. Omega 1997, 25(1):147-166.
35. Daft R.L. A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Acad. Manage. J. 1978, 21(2):193-210.
36. Kimberly J.R., Evanisko M. Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovation. Acad. Manage. J. 1981, 24(4):689-713.
37. Damanpour F., Evan W.E. Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of organizational lag. Adm. Sci. Q. 1984, 29(3):392-409.
38. Coeurderoy R., Durand R. Leveraging the advantage of early entry: proprietary technologies versus cost leadership. J.Bus. Res. 2004, 57(6):583-590.
39. Blundell R., Griffith R., Reenen J.V. Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Rev. Econ. Stud. 1999, 66(3):529-554.
40. Chu P.Y., Teng M.J., Huang C.H. Virtual integration and profitability: some evidence from Taiwan's IC industry. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 2005, 29(1/2):152-172.
41. Liu W.H. Determinants of the semiconductor industry cycles. J. Policy Model. 2005, 27(7):853-866.
42. Lim K. The relationship between research & innovation in the semiconductor & pharmaceutical industries (1981-1997). Res. Policy 2004, 33(2):287-321.