Making a case for classroom listening assessment

Seminars in Hearing

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 177-187

  Johnson, Cheryl Deconde ^a  

^a ADVantage: Audiology Deaf Education Consulting   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom listening; communication plan; functional assessment; hearing assistance technology; IDEA; response to intervention

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CLASSROOM LISTENING; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEARING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; OBSERVATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; READING; RESPONSIBILITY; REVIEW; SELF EVALUATION; SPEECH ANALYSIS;

EID: 77956669569     PISSN: 07340451     EISSN: 10988955     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262324     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, DANS. Table 22f. Students ages 621 with hearing impairments, Educational Environment. IDEA Data Accountability Center. [Online] July 15, 2007. Available at: www.ideadata.org Accessed Sept. 15, 2009
2. National Association of State Directors of Special Education. Response to Intervention. Alexandria, VA National Association of State Directors of Special Education 2005
3. U.S. Department of Education. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Washington, DC. Fed Regist 2002 (January) 8
4. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching Children to Read: An Evidenced-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction, NIH Publication No. 004769. Washington, DC U.S. Government Printing Office 2000
5. Stelmachowicz P. Pediatric amplification: past, present, and future In: Seewald R, Bamford J A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification 2004. Proceedings of the Third International Conference. Phonak AG 2005 27-40
6. Lauer S. Wireless SolutionsThe State of the Art and Future of FM Technology for the Hearing Impaired Consumer. In: Fabry D, DeConde Johnson C, eds. ACCESS: Achieving Clear Communication Employing Sound Solutions 2003. Proceedings of the First International Conference Phonak AG 2004 31-37
7. Zwolan T. Cochlear implants In: Katz J, Medwetsky L, Burkhard R, Hood L Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore, MD Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2009 912-933
8. Crandell C, Smaldino J. Classroom acoustics for children with normal hearing and with hearing impairment. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2000 31 362-370
9. Davis J M., Elfenbein J, Schum R, Bentler R A. Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairments on language, educational, and psychosocial behavior of children. J Speech Hear Disord 1986 51 53-62
10. Nelson P, Kohnert K, Sabur S, Shaw D. Classroom noise and children learning through a second language: double jeopardy? Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2005 36 219-229
11. Houtgast T. The effect of ambient noise on speech intelligibility in classrooms. Appl Acoust 1981 14 15-25
12. Iglehart F. Combined effects of classroom reverberation and noise on speech perception by students with typical and impaired hearing. Presented at: Inter-noise 2009, Innovations in Practical Noise Control August 2326, 2009 Ottawa, Canada
13. U.S. Department of Education. Rules and regulations for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004. Washington DC. Fed Regist 2006 156 46540-46845
14. Colorado Department of Education. Response to Intervention: A Practitioner's Guide to Implementation. Denver, CO Colorado Department of Education 2008
15. Iglehart F. Speech perception by students with cochlear implants using sound-field systems in classrooms. Am J Audiol 2004 13 62-72
16. Anderson K L., Goldstein H. Speech perception benefits of FM and infrared devices to children with hearing aids in a typical classroom. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2004 35 169-184
17. Boothroyd A. The FM wireless link: an invisible microphone cable In Ross M FM Auditory Training Systems. Timonium, MD York Press 1992
18. Schafer E, Thibodeau L. Speech recognition performance of children using cochlear implants and FM systems. Journal of Educational Audiology 2003 11 15-26
19. Trezek B J., Malmgren K W. The efficacy of utilizing a phonics treatment package with middle school deaf and hard-of-hearing students. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2005 10 256-271
20. Waddy-Smith B, Wilson V. See that sound! Visual phonics helps deaf and hard of hearing students develop reading skills. Odyssey 2003 5 14-17
21. American Academy of Audiology. Pediatric amplification guideline. Available at: www.audiology.org
22. Scollie S. Prescriptive procedures for infants and children In: Seewald R, Bamford J A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification 2004. Proceedings of the Third International Conference Phonak AG 2005
23. Stelmachowicz P, Hoover B. Hearing instrument fitting and verification for children In: Katz J, Medwetsky L, Burkhard R, Hood L Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore, MD Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2009 817-845
24. Pittman A L., Lewis D E., Hoover B M., Stelmachowicz P G. Recognition performance for four combinations of FM system and hearing aid microphone signals in adverse listening conditions. Ear Hear 1999 20 279-289
25. Lewis D, Eiten L. Assessment of advanced hearing instrument and FM technology In: Fabry D, DeConde Johnson C ACCESS: Achieving Clear Communication Employing Sound Solutions 2003. Proceedings of the First International FM Conference Phonak AG 2005 167-174
26. Anderson K, Goldstein H, Colodzin L, Iglehart F. Benefit of S/N enhancing devices to speech perception of children listening in a typical classroom with hearing aids or a cochlear implant. Journal of Educational Audiology 2005 12 14-28
27. Lewis D. Assistive devices for classroom listening: FM systems. Am J Audiol 1994 3 70-83
28. Smaldino J, Crandell C, Kreisman B, John A, Kreisman N. Room acoustics and auditory rehabilitation technology In: Katz J, Medwetsky L, Burkhard R, Hood L Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore, MD Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2009 745-775
29. Gabbard S. The use of FM technology for infants and young children In: Seewald R, Bamford J A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification 2004. Proceedings of the Third International Conference Phonak AG 2005 155-161
30. American Academy of Audiology. Clinical practice guidelines: remote microphone hearing assistance technologies for children and youth from birth to 21 years. Available at: www.audiology.org
31. Smoski W, Brunt M, Tannahill C. Children's auditory performance scale. Educational Audiology Association. Available at: www.edaud.org
32. Johnson DeConde C, Benson P, Seaton J. Educational Audiology Handbook. San Diego, CA Singular Publishing Group 1997 336-339
33. Ling D. Speech and the Hearing Impaired Child: Theory and Practice. Washington, DC AGBell Association for the Deaf 1976
34. Etymotic Research Inc. 2005 BKB-SIN. [CD].
35. Anderson K, Smaldino J. Listening Inventory for Education (L.I.F.E.). Available at: www.karenandersonconsulting.com
36. Antia S D., Sabers D L., Stinson M S. Validity and reliability of the classroom participation questionnaire with deaf and hard of hearing students in public schools. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2007 12 158-171
37. Elkayam J, English K. Counseling adolescents with hearing loss with the use of self-assessment/significant other questionnaires. J Am Acad Audiol 2003 14 485-499
38. American National Standards Institute. Acoustical Performance Criteria, Design Requirements, and Guidelines for Schools. New York, NY Acoustical Society of America 2002