Size and shape after-effects: Same or different mechanism?

Vision Research

Volumn 50, Issue 21, 2010, Pages 2127-2136

  Gheorghiu, Elena ^a   Kingdom, Frederick A A ^b   Witney, Emma ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptation; After effect; Contour; Curvature; Shape; Size

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 77956650027     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anderson N.D., Habak C., Wilkinson F., Wilson H.R. Evaluating shape after-effects with radial frequency patterns. Vision Research 2007, 47(3):298-308.
2. Bell J., Gheorghiu E., Kingdom F.A. Orientation tuning of curvature adaptation reveals both curvature-polarity-selective and non-selective mechanisms. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(12):1-11.
3. Bell J., Kingdom F.A. Global contour shapes are coded differently from their local components. Vision Research 2009, 49(13):1702-1710.
4. Bjorklund R.A., Magnussen S. A study of interocular transfer of spatial adaptation. Perception 1981, 10(5):511-518.
5. Blake R., Overton R., Lema-Stern S. Interocular transfer of visual aftereffects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1981, 7(2):367-381.
6. Blakemore C., Campbell F.W. On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. Journal of Physiology 1969, 203(1):237-260.
7. Blakemore C., Nachmias J. The orientation specificity of two visual after-effects. Journal of Physiology 1971, 213(1):157-174.
8. Blakemore C., Nachmias J., Sutton P. The perceived spatial frequency shift: Evidence for frequency-selective neurones in the human brain. Journal of Physiology 1970, 210(3):727-750.
9. Blakemore C., Over R. Curvature detectors in human vision?. Perception 1974, 3(1):3-7.
10. Blakemore C., Sutton P. Size adaptation: A new aftereffect. Science 1969, 166(902):245-247.
11. Burton C.J., Ruddock K.H. Visual adaptation to patterns containing two-dimensional spatial structure. Vision Research 1978, 18(1):93-99.
12. DeValois K.K. Independence of black and white: Phase specific adaptation. Vision Research 1977, 17:209-215.
13. Gheorghiu E., Kingdom F.A. Luminance-contrast properties of contour-shape processing revealed through the shape-frequency after-effect. Vision Research 2006, 46(21):3603-3615.
14. Gheorghiu E., Kingdom F.A. Chromatic tuning of contour-shape mechanisms revealed through the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effects. Vision Research 2007, 47(14):1935-1949.
15. Gheorghiu E., Kingdom F.A. The spatial feature underlying the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effects. Vision Research 2007, 47(6):834-844.
16. Gheorghiu E., Kingdom F.A. Spatial properties of curvature-encoding mechanisms revealed through the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effects. Vision Research 2008, 48(9):1107-1124.
17. Gheorghiu E., Kingdom F.A. Multiplication in curvature processing. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(2):1-17.
18. Gheorghiu E., Kingdom F.A., Thai M.T., Sampasivam L. Binocular properties of curvature-encoding mechanisms revealed through two shape after-effects. Vision Research 2009, 49(14):1765-1774.
19. Gheorghiu E., Kingdom F., Varshney R. Curvature coding is tuned for motion direction. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(3):1-19.
20. Gibson J.J. Adaptation, aftereffect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1933, 20:453-467.
21. Hardy J., De Valois K. Color-selective analysis of luminance-varying stimuli. Vision Research 2002, 42(16):1941-1951.
22. Heeley D.W. A perceived spatial frequency shift at orientations orthogonal to adapting gratings. Vision Research 1979, 19(11):1229-1236.
23. Magnussen S., Kurtenbach W. Adapting to two orientations: Disinhibition in a visual aftereffect. Science 1980, 207(4433):908-909.
24. Magnussen S., Kurtenbach W. Linear summation of tilt illusion and tilt aftereffect. Vision Research 1980, 20(1):39-42.
25. Nishida S., Motoyoshi I., Takeuchi T. Is the size aftereffect direction selective?. Vision Research 1999, 39(21):3592-3601.
26. Regan D., Hamstra S.J. Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: Dissociation of shape from size. Vision Research 1992, 32(10):1845-1864.
27. Suzuki S. Attention-dependent brief adaptation to contour orientation: A high-level aftereffect for convexity?. Vision Research 2001, 41(28):3883-3902.
28. Suzuki S. Attentional selection of overlapped shapes: A study using brief shape aftereffects. Vision Research 2003, 43(5):549-561.
29. Suzuki S., Cavanagh P. A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24(5):1315-1341.
30. Virsu V., Haapasalo S. Relationships between channels for colour and spatial frequency in human vision. Perception 1973, 2(1):31-40.
31. Wenderoth P., Johnstone S. The different mechanisms of the direct and indirect tilt illusions. Vision Research 1988, 28(2):301-312.