Multiplication in curvature processing

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2009, Pages

  Gheorghiu, Elena ^a   Kingdom, Frederick A A ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptation; After effect; Contour; Curvature; Multiplication

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; MATHEMATICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 62149095781     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.2.23     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Adelson, E. H., & Bergen, J. R. (1985). Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 2, 284-299.
2. Anderson, N. D., Habak C., Wilkinson F., & Wilson, H. R. (2007). Evaluating shape after-effects with radial frequency patterns. Vision Research, 47, 298-308.
3. Anzai, A., Peng, X., & Van Essen, D. C. (2007). Neurons in monkey visual area V2 encode combinations of orientations. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1313-1321.
4. Barlow, H. B., & Levick, W. R. (1965). The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina. The Journal of Physiology, 178, 477-504.
5. Ben-Shahar, O., & Zucker, S. W. (2004). Sensitivity to curvatures in orientation-based texture segmentation. Vision Research, 44, 257-277.
6. Blakemore, C., & Sutton, P. (1969). Size adaptation: A new aftereffect. Science, 166, 245-247.
7. Burke, D., & Wenderoth, P. (1989). Cyclopean tilt aftereffects can be induced monocularly: Is there a purely binocular process? Perception, 18, 471-482.
8. Clifford, C. W. (2002). Perceptual adaptation: Motion parallels orientation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 136-143.
9. Connor, C. E., Brincat, S. L., & Pasupathy, A. (2007). Transformation of shape information in the ventral pathway. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17, 140-147.
10. Dobbins, A., Zucker, S. W., & Cynader, M. S. (1987). Endstopped neurons in the visual cortex as a substrate for calculating curvature. Nature, 329, 438-441.
11. Dobbins, A., Zucker, S. W., & Cynader, M. S. (1989). Endstopping and curvature. Vision Research, 29, 1371-1387.
12. Dragoi, V., Sharma, J., Miller, E. K., & Sur, M. (2002). Dynamics of neuronal sensitivity in visual cortex and local feature discrimination. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 883-891.
13. Dragoi, V., Sharma, J., & Sur, M. (20PO). Adaptation-induced plasticity of orientation tuning in adult visual cortex. Neuron, 28, 287-298.
14. Gabbiani, F., Knapp, H. G., Hatsopoulos, N., Mo, C. H., Koch, C., & Laurent, G. (2004). Multiplication and stimulus invariance in a looming-sensitive neuron. The Journal of Physiology, 98, 19-34.
15. Gabbiani, F., Knapp, H. G., Koch, C., & Laurent, G. (2002). Multiplicative computation in a visual neuron sensitive to looming. Nature, 420, 320-324.
16. Gallant, J. L., Braun, J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1993). Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex. Science, 259, 100-103.
17. Gallant, J. L., Connor, C. E., Rakshit, S., Lewis, J. W., & Van Essen, D. C. (1996). Neural responses to polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in area V4 of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 2718-2739.
18. Georgeson, M., (2004). Visual aftereffects: Cortical neurons change their tune. Current Biology, 14, R751-R753.
19. Gheorghiu, E., & Kingdom, F. A. (2006). Luminance-contrast properties of contour-shape processing revealed through the shape-frequency after-effect. Vision Research, 46, 3603-3615.
20. Gheorghiu, E., & Kingdom, F. A. (2007a). The spatial feature underlying the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effects. Vision Research, 47, 834-844.
21. Gheorghiu, E., & Kingdom, F. A. (2007b). Chromatic. tuning of contour-shape mechanisms revealed-through the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effects. Vision Research, 47, 1935-1949.
22. Gheorghiu, E., & Kingdom, F. A. (2008). Spatial properties of curvature-encoding mechanisms revealed through the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effects. Vision Research, 48, 1107-1124.
23. Gibson, J. J. (1933). Adaptation, aftereffect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. Journal of Experimental. Psychology, 20, 453-467.
24. Hassenstein, B., & Reichardt, W. (1956). Systemtheoretische Analyse der Zeit-, Reihenfolgen-und Vorzeichenauswertung bei der Bewegungsperzeption des Ruesselkaefers Clorophanus. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 11, 513-524.
25. Hedgé, J., & Van Essen, D. C. (2000). Selectivity for complex shapes in primate visual area V2. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, RC61.
26. Koch, C. (1999). Biophysics of computation: Information processing in single neurons (pp. 471-473). New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Koch, C., & Poggio, T. (1992). Multiplying with synapses and neurons. In T. McKenna; J. Davis, & S. F. Zometzer (Eds.), Single neuron computation (Neural nets: Foundations to applications) (pp. 325-339).
28. Academic Press Inc., Harcourt Brace, Jovanivich Publishers.
29. Kramer, D., & Fable, M. (1996). A simple mechanism for detecting low curvatures. Vision Research, 36, 1411-1419.
30. Magnussen, S., & Kurtenbach, W. (1980). Linear summation of tilt illusion and tilt aftereffect. Vision Research, 20, 39-42.
31. McAdams, C. J., & Maunsell, J. H. (1999). Effects of attention on orientation-tuning functions of single neurons in macaque cortical area V4. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 431-441.
32. Mead, C. (1989). Analog VSLI and neural systems. Reading, MA: Adison-Wesley.
33. Pasupathy, A., & Connor, C. E. (1999). 'Responses to contour features in macaque area V4. Journal of Neurophysiology, 82, 2490-2502.
34. Pasupathy, A., & Connor, C. E. (2001). Shape representation in area V4: Position-specific tuning for boundary conformation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 2505-2519.
35. Pasupathy, A., & Connor, C. E. (2002). Population coding of shape in area V4. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1332-1338.
36. Peña, J. L. & Konishi, M. (2001). Auditory spatial receptive fields created by multiplication. Science, 292, 249-252.
37. Poirier, F. J., & Wilson, H. R. (2006). A biological plausible model of human radial frequency perception. Vision Research, 46, 2443-2455,
38. Reichardt, W. (1957). Autokorrelations-Auswertung als Funktionsprinzip des Zentralnervensystems. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 12, 448-457.
39. Resnikoff, H. L., & Wells, R. O. (1973). Mathematics in civilization. New York.: Halt, Rinehart & Winston.
40. Salinas, E., & Abbott, L. F. (1996). A model of multiplicative neural responses in parietal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 11956-11961.
41. Sun, H., & Frost, B. J. (1998). Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 296-303.
42. Treue, S., & Martinez Trujillo, J. C. (1999). Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature, 399, 575-579.
43. Treue, S., & Maunsell, J. H. (1999). Effects of attention on the processing of motion in macaque middle temporal and medial superior temporal visual cortical, areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 7591-7602.
44. Tyler, C. W. (1973). Periodic vernier acuity. The Journal of Physiology, 228, 637-647.
45. Van Kruysbergen, N. A., & de Weert, C. M. (1994). Aftereffects of apparent motion: The existence of an AND-type binocular system in human vision. Perception, 23, 1069-1083.
46. van Santen, J. P., & Sperling, G. (1985). Elaborated Reichardt detectors. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 2, 300-321.
47. van Santen, J. P., & Sperling, G. (1984). Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 1, 451-473.
48. Versavel, M., Orban, G. A., & Lagae, L. (1990). Responses of visual cortical neurons to curved stimuli and chevrons. Vision Research, 30, 235-248.
49. Wenderoth, P., & Johnstone, S. (1988). The different mechanisms of the direct and indirect tilt illusions. Vision Research, 28, 301-312.
50. Wenderoth, P., Johnstone, S., & van der Zwan, R. (1989). Two-dimensional tilt illusions induced by orthogonal plaid patterns: Effects of plaid motion, orientation, spatial separation, and spatial frequency. Perception, 18, 25-38.
51. Wilkinson, F., Wilson, H. R., & Habak, C. (1998). Detection and recognition of radial-frequency patterns. Vision Research, 38, 3555-3568.
52. Wilson, H. R. (1985). Discrimination of contour curvature: Data and theory. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 2, 1191-1199.
53. Wilson, H. R., & Richards, W. A. (1989). Mechanisms of contour curvature discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 6, 106-115.
54. Zetzsche, C., & Barth, E. (1990). Fundamental limits of linear filters in the visual processing of two-dimensional signals. Vision Research, 30, 1111-1117.