Importance of housekeeping gene selection for accurate reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction in a wound healing model

Wound Repair and Regeneration

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 460-466

  Turabelidze, Anna ^a   Guo, Shujuan ^a   Dipietro, Luisa A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

18S GENE; ACCURACY; ACTBETA GENE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; ATP5B GENE; BETA2M GENE; CANX GENE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYC1 GENE; FEMALE; GAPDH GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GUS GENE; HOUSEKEEPING GENE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RPLP2 GENE; SDHA GENE; TBP GENE; UBC GENE; VALIDATION PROCESS; WOUND HEALING; YWHAZ GENE;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; BETA-GLOBULINS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GLYCERALDEHYDE-3-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE (NADP+)(PHOSPHORYLATING); MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA; RNA, RIBOSOMAL; SIALIC ACIDS; SKIN; WOUND HEALING; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 77956638217     PISSN: 10671927     EISSN: 1524475X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00611.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. VanGuilder HD, Vrana KE, Freeman WM. Twenty-five years of quantitative PCR for gene expression analysis. Biotechniques 2008 44: 619 626.
2. Nygard A, Jorgensen CB, Cirera S, Fredholm M. Selection of reference genes for gene expression studies in pig tissues using SYBR green qPCR. BMC Mol Biol 2007 8: 67 73.
3. Suzuki T, Higgins PJ, Crawford DR. Control selection for RNA quantitation. Biotechniques 2000 29: 332 337.
4. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepa A, Speleman F. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 2002 3: 34.1 0034.11.
5. Minner F, Poumay Y. Candidate Housekeeping Genes Require Evaluation before the Selection for Studies of Human Epidermal Keratinocytes. J Investigative Dermatol 2009 129: 770 773.
6. Finch PW, Rubin JS, Miki T, Ron D, Aaronson SA. Human KGF is FGF-related with properties of a paracrine effector of epithelial cell growth. Science 1989 245: 752 755.
7. Werner S, Peters KG, Longaker MT, Fuller-Pace F, Banda MJ, Williams LT. Large induction of keratinocyte growth factor expression in the dermis during wound healing. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1992 89: 6896 6900.
8. Czechowski T, Stitt M, Altmann T, Udvardi MK, Scheible WR. Genome-wide identification and testing of superior reference genes for transcript normalization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2005 139: 5 17.
9. Wu Y, Rees J. Variation in epidermal housekeeping gene expression in different pathological states. Acta Derm Venereol 2000 80: 2 3.
10. Bär M, Bär D, Lehmann B. Selection and validation of candidate housekeeping genes for studies of human keratinocytes - review and recommendations. J Invest Dermatol 2009 129: 770 773.
11. Radonic A, Thulke S, Mackay IM, Landt O, Siegert W, Nitsche A. Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative realtime PCR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004 313: 856 862.
12. Selvey S, Thompson EW, Matthaei K, Lea RA, Irving MG, Griffiths LR. Beta-actin - an unsuitable internal control for RT-PCR. Mol Cell Probes 2001 15: 307 311.
13. Glare EM, Divjak M, Bailey MJ, Walters EH. Beta-Actin and GAPDH housekeeping gene expression in asthmatic airways is variable and not suitable for normalising mRNA levels. Thorax 2002 57: 765 70, 12.
14. Deindl E, Boengler K, Van Royen N, Schaper W. Differential expression of GAPDH and beta3-actin in growing collateral arteries. Mol Cell Biochem 2002 236: 139 146.
15. de Jonge HJ, Fehrmann RS, de Bont ES, Hofstra RM, Gerbens F, Kamps WA, de Vries EG, van der Zee AG, te Meerman GJ, ter Elst A. Evidence based selection of housekeeping genes. PloS One 2007 2: e898.