An examination of call and genetic variation in three wide-ranging Southeast Asian anuran species

Raffles Bulletin of Zoology

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 369-379

  Sheridan, Jennifer A ^a   Bickford, David ^b   Su, Kathy Feng Yi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Frogs; Microhyla; Polypedates; Rana; Singapore; Thailand

Indexed keywords

ANURA; MICROHYLA; MICROHYLA HEYMONSI; POLYPEDATES; POLYPEDATES LEUCOMYSTAX; RANA ERYTHRAEA;

EID: 77956627368     PISSN: None     EISSN: 02172445     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alcala, A. C., G. Joermann & J. Brzoska, 1986. Mating calls of certain Philippine anurans (Microhylidae, Ranidae). Silliman Journal, 33: 31-44.
2. Ball, R. W. & D. L. Jameson, 1966. Premating isolating mechanisms in sympatric and allopatric Hyla regilla and Hyla californiae. Evolution, 20(4): 533-551.
3. Boul, K. E., W. C. Funk, C. R. Darst, D. C. Cannatella & M. J. Ryan, 2007. Sexual selection drives speciation in an Amazonian frog. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 274(1608): 399-406.
4. Brown, R. M., S. J. Richards, J. Sukumaran & J. Foufopoulos, 2006. A new morphologically cryptic species of forest frog (genus Platymantis) from new Britain Island, Bismarck Archipelago. Zootaxa, 1334: 45-68.
5. Brzoska, J., G. Joermann & A. C. Alcala, 1986. Structure and variability of the calls of Polypedates leucomystax (Amphibia: Rhacophoridae) from Negros, Philippines. Silliman Journal,33: 87-103.
6. Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., T. A. Ludwig & P. M. Narins, 2002. Call diversity in an old world treefrog: Level dependence and latency of acoustic responses. Bioacoustics, 13(1): 21-35.
7. Ferguson, J. W. H., 2002. On the use of genetic divergence for identifying species. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 75(4): 509-516.
8. Fouquet, A., A. Gilles, M. Vences, C. Marty, M. Blanc & N. J. Gemmell, 2007. Underestimation of species richness in neotropical frogs revealed by mtDNA analyses. PLoS ONE, 2(10): e1109.
9. Garcia-Rutledge, E. J. & P. M. Narins, 2001. Shared acoustic resources in an old world frog community. Herpetologica, 57(1): 104-116.
10. Goldberg, C. S., B. K. Sullivan, J. H. Malone & C. R. Schwalbe, 2004. Divergence among barking frogs (Eleutherodactylus augusti) in the southwestern United States. Herpetologica, 60(3): 312-320.
11. Heyer, W. R., 1971. Mating calls of some frogs from Thailand. Fieldiana, 58(6): 61-82.
12. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & F. Ronquist, 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 17(8): 754-755.
13. Kuramoto, M., 1986. Call structures of the Rhacophorid frogs from Taiwan. Scientific Report of the Laboratory for Amphibian Biology Hiroshima University, 8: 45-68.
14. Kuramoto, M., 1987. Advertisement calls of 2 Taiwan Microhylid frogs, Microhyla heymonsi and Microhyla ornata. Zoological Science, 4(3): 563-567.
15. Littlejohn, M. J. & R. S. Oldham, 1968. Rana pipiens complex: mating call structure and taxonomy. Science, 162(3857): 1003-1005.
16. Lougheed, S. C., J. D. Austin, J. P. Bogart, P. T. Boag & A. A. Chek, 2006. Multi-character perspectives on the evolution of intraspecific differentiation in a neotropical hylid frog. Evolutionary Biology, 6: 23.
17. Maddison, W. P. & D. R. Maddison, 1989. Interactive analysis of phylogeny and character evolution using the computer program MacClade. Folia Primatologica, 53(1-4): 190-202.
18. Marquez, R. & X. R. Eekhout, 2006. Advertisement calls of six species of anurans from Bali, Republic of Indonesia. Journal of Natural History, 40(9-10): 571-588.
19. Matsui, M., 1997. Call characteristics of Malaysian Leptolalax with a description of two new species (Anura: Pelobatidae). Copeia, 1997(1): 158-165.
20. Matsui, M., H. Ito, T. Shimada, H. Ota, S. K. Saidapur, W. Khonsue, T. Tanaka-Ueno & G. F. Wu, 2005. Taxonomic relationships within the Pan-Oriental narrow-mouth toad Microhyla ornata as revealed by mtDNA analysis (Amphibia, Anura, Microhylidae). Zoological Science, 22(4): 489-495.
21. Matsui, M., T. Seto & T. Utsunomiya, 1986. Acoustic and karyotypic evidence for specific separation of Polypedates megacephalus from Polypedates leucomystax. Journal of Herpetology, 20(4): 483-489.
22. Narins, P. M., A. S. Feng, H. S. Yong & J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, 1998. Morphological, behavioral, and genetic divergence of sympatric morphotypes of the treefrog Polypedates leucomystax in peninsular Malaysia. Herpetologica, 54(2): 129-142.
23. Pröhl, H., R. A. Koshy, U. Mueller, A. S. Rand & M. J. Ryan, 2006. Geographic variation of genetic and behavioral traits in northern and southern Tungara frogs. Evolution, 60(8): 1669-1679.
24. Sanchez-Herriaz, M. J., R. Marquez, L. J. Barbadillo & J. Bosch, 1995. Mating calls of 3 species of anurans from Borneo. Herpetological Journal, 5(4): 293-297.
25. Sheridan, J. A., 2009. Reproductive variation corresponding to breeding season length in three tropical frog species. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 25: 583-592.
26. Stuart, B. L., R. F. Inger & H. K. Voris, 2006. High level of cryptic species diversity revealed by sympatric lineages of Southeast Asian forest frogs. Biology Letters, 2(3): 470-474.
27. Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin & D. G. Higgins, 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: fl exible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 25(24): 4876-4882.
28. Trepanier, T. L., A. Lathrop & R. W. Murphy, 1999. Rhacophorus leucomystax in Vietnam with acoustic analyses of courtship and territorial calls. Asiatic Herpetological Research, 8: 102-106.