I like those glasses on you, but not in the mirror: Fluency, preference, and virtual mirrors

Journal of Consumer Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 471-475

  Cho, H ^a   Schwarz, Norbert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Fluency; Virtual mirror

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956618425     PISSN: 10577408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2010.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arnheim R. Art and visual perception: The new version 1974, University of California Press, Berkeley.
2. Chiang K., Dholakia R.R. Factors driving consumer intention to shop online: An empirical investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2003, 13:177-183.
3. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
4. Harmon-Jones E., Allen J.J.B. The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: Evidence from psychophysiological and individual differences approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2001, 27:889-898.
5. Joy A., Sherry J., Venkatesh A., Deschenes J. Perceiving images and telling tales: A visual and verbal analysis of the meaning of the internet. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2009, 19:556-566.
6. Labroo A.A., Dhar R., Schwarz N. Of frog wines and frowning watches: Semantic priming, perceptual fluency, and brand evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research 2008, 34:819-831.
7. Mita T.H., Dermer M., Knight J. Reversed facial images and the mere-exposure hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1977, 35:597-601.
8. Monahan J.L., Murphy S.T., Zajonc R.B. Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science 2000, 6:462-466.
9. Pandelaere M., Millet K., Van den Bergh B. Madonna or Don McLean? The effect of order of exposure on relative liking. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2010, 20:442-451.
10. Pham M.T. The logic of feeling. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2004, 14:360-369.
11. Reber R., Schwarz N., Winkielman P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2004, 8:364-382.
12. Reber R., Winkielman P., Schwarz N. Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science 1998, 9:45-48.
13. Schwarz N. Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2004, 14:332-348.
14. Schwarz N., Clore G.L. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983, 45:513-523.
15. Schwarz N., Clore G.L. Feelings and phenomenal experiences. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles 2007, 385-407. Guilford, New York. 2nd ed. A. Kruglanski, E.T. Higgins (Eds.).
16. Winkielman P., Cacioppo J.T. Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 81:989-1000.
17. Winkielman P., Schwarz N., Fazendeiro T.A., Reber R. The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. Psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion 2003, 189-217. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah. J. Musch, K.C. Klauer (Eds.).
18. Zajonc R.B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968, 9:1-27.