A socio-epistemological framework for scientific publishing

Social Epistemology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 201-218

  Simon, Judith ^a  

^a INSTITUT JEAN NICOD   (France)

Author keywords

Information technology; Scholarly communication; Scientific publishing; Social epistemology

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956526208     PISSN: 02691728     EISSN: 14645297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2010.498930     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adomavicius, G., and A. Tuzhilin. 2005. Toward the next generation of recommender systems. A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 17 (6): 734-9.
2. Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3. Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4. Callon, M. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge?, edited by J. Law, pp. 196-233. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
5. Casati, F., M. Marchese, A. Ragone, and M. Turrini. 2009. Is peer review any good? A quantitative analysis of peer review (Report). Trento Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science, University of Trento.
6. Coady, D. 2006. When experts disagree. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 3 (1): 68-79.
7. Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic injustice. Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Goldman, A. I. 1992. Liaisons: Philosophy meets the cognitive and social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
9. Goldman, A. I. 2003. Knowledge in a social world. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10. Hacking, I. 1992. Statistical language, statistical truth and statistical reason: The self-authentification of a style of scientific reasoning. In Social dimensions of science, edited by E. McMullin, pp. 130-57. Notre Dame: Indiana Press.
11. Hidderley, R., and P. Rafferty. 2006. Flickr and democratic indexing: Disciplining desire lines. Advances in Knowledge Organization 10: 405-11.
12. Hu, N., J. Zhang, and P. A. Pavlou. 2009. Overcoming the J-shaped distribution of product reviews. Communications of the ACM 52 (10): 144-7.
13. Kusch, M. 2002. Knowledge by agreement: The programme of communitarian epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Lamont, M. 2009. How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Lehrer, K., and C. Wagner. 1981. Rational consensus in science and society. Dordrecht: Reidel.
17. Levy, P. 1997. Collective intelligence. Cambridge: Basic Books.
18. Longino, H. E. 2002. The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Origgi, G. Forthcoming. Designing wisdom through the web. The passion of ranking. In Collective wisdom, edited by J. Elster and H. Landermore. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
20. Page, S. E. 2007. The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21. Rainie, L. 2007. 28% of online Americans have used the internet to tag content. Forget Dewey and his decimals, internet users are revolutionizing the way we classify information - and make sense of it. PEW Internet & American Life Project. Washington, DC: PEW Research Center.
22. Reinhart, M. 2009. Peer review of grant applications in biology and medicine. Reliability, fairness, and validity. Scientometrics 81 (3): 789-809.
23. Shirky, C. 2005. Ontology is overrated: Categories, links, and tags [cited 31 March 2010]. Available from http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html; INTERNET.
24. Shirky, C. 2009. A speculative post on the idea of algorithmic authority [cited 31 March 2010]. Available from http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/11/a-speculative-post-on-the-idea-ofalgorithmic-authority/; INTERNET.
25. Simon, J. 2010a. Knowing together: A social epistemology for socio-technical epistemic systems. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna.
26. Simon, J. 2010b. The entanglement of trust and knowledge on the web. Ethics and Information Technology (Online first, DOI: 10.1007/s10676-010-9243-5) [cited 23 August 2010]. Available from http://www.springerlink.com/content/824v612644332205; INTERNET.
27. Solomon, M. 2001. Social empiricism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
28. Suchman, L. A. 2007/2009. Human-machine reconfigurations. Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Surowiecki, J. 2004. The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations. New York: Random House.
30. Thagard, P. 1997. Collaborative knowledge. Noûs 31 (2): 242-61.
31. Wray, B. K. 2009. The epistemic cultures of science and Wikipedia: A comparison. Episteme 6 (1): 38-51.