When Experts Disagree

Episteme

Volumn 3, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 68-79

  Coady, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008934500     PISSN: 17423600     EISSN: 17500117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.68     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Anderson Lisa R., and Holt Charles A, (1997). “Information Cascades in the Laboratory”. American Economic Review 87: 847–62.
2. Caplow Theodore (1947). “Rumors in War”. Social Forces 25: 298–302.
3. Coady David (2006). “Rumour has it”. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20(1): 41–53.
4. Goldman Alvin I. (2001). “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63: 85–109.
5. Goldman Alvin I. (2002). “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?” In Goldman Alvin I., Pathways to Knowledge: Private and Public. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Hung Angela, and Plott Charles (2001). “Information Cascades: Replication and an Extension to Majority Rule and Conformity-Rewarding Institutions.” American Economic Review 91: 847–62.
7. Laplace Pierre (1951). A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities, trans. Truscott F.W. and Emory F.E. New York: Dover.
8. Lehrer Keith and Wagner Carl (1981). Rational Consensus in Science and Society: a Philosophical and Mathematical Study. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
9. Locke John (1947). Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Dent.
10. Surowiecki James (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds. London: Little, Brown.
11. Wittgenstein Ludwig (1968). Philosophical Investigations, trans. Anscombe G.E.M., Oxford: Blackwell.