Mathematics Reform Curricula and Special Education: Identifying Intersections and Implications for Practice

Intervention in School and Clinic

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 13-21

  Sayeski, Kristin L ^a   Paulsen, Kim J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

learning disabilities; mathematics; reform curricula; special education

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956521273     PISSN: 10534512     EISSN: 15384810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1053451210369515     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bottge, B.A., Rueda, E., Serlin, R.C., Hung, Y., & Kwon, J.M. (2007). Shrinking achievement differences with anchored math problems: Challenges and possibilities. Journal of Special Education, 41, 31-49.
2. Bryant, D.P., Kim, S.A., Hartman, P., & Bryant, B.R. (2006). Teaching middle school students with mathematics disabilities. In M. Montague & A. Jitendra (Eds.), Teaching mathematics to middle school students with learning difficulties (pp. 7-28). New York: Guilford Press.
3. Carnine, D. (1991). Curricular interventions for teaching higher order thinking to all students: Introduction to the special series. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(5), 261-269.
4. Carroll, W.M. (1997). Results of third-grade students in a reform curriculum on the Illinois state mathematics test. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(2), 237-242.
5. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Burish, P. (2000). Peer assisted learning strategies: An evidence based practice to promote reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(2), 85-91.
6. Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 204-219.
7. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Karns, K. (2001). Enhancing kindergartners' mathematical development: Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies. Elementary School Journal, 101(5), 495-510.
8. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Powell, S.R., Seethaler, P.M., Cirino, P.T., & Fletcher, J.M. (2008). Intensive intervention for students with mathematics disabilities: Seven principles for effective practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 79-92.
9. Geary, D.C., & Brown, S.C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 398-406.
10. Gersten, R. (1998). Recent advances in instructional research for students with learning disabilities: An overview. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 162-170.
11. Greenwood, C.R., Delquadri, J.C., & Hall, R.V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58-88). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
12. Grouws, D.A., Smith, M.A., & Sztajn, P. (2004). The preparation and teaching practices of United States mathematics teachers: Grades 4 and 8. In P. Kloosterman & F. K. Lester Jr. (Eds.), Results and interpretations of the 1990 through 2000 Mathematics Assessments of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (pp. 211-267). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
13. Hallahan, D.P., Kauffman, J.M., & Pullen, P.C. (2008). Exceptional learners. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
14. Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524-549.
15. Herrera, T.A., & Owens, D.T. (2001). The new new math? Two reform movements in mathematics education. Theory Into Practice, 40(2), 84-92.
16. Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 1990, 20 U.S.C.§§ 1400 et seq. (1990).
17. Mazzocco, M.M., Devlin, K.T., & McKenney, S.J. (2008). Is it a fact? Timed arithmetic performance of children with mathematical learning disabilities (MLD) varies as a function of how MLD is defined. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 318-344.
18. Miller, A.D., & Heward, W.L. (1992). Do your students really know their math facts? Using daily time trials to build fluency. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28(2), 98-104.
19. Montague, M. (1997). Cognitive strategy instruction in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2), 164-177.
20. Montague, M. (2008). Self-regulation strategies to improve mathematical problem solving for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(1), 37-44.
21. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
23. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
24. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
25. Parmar, R., & Cawley, J. (1997). Preparing teachers to teach mathematics to students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2), 188-197.
26. Perie, M., Grigg, W., & Dion, G. (2005). The nation's report card: Mathematics 2005 (NCES 20006-453). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
27. Riordan, J.E., & Noyce, P.E. (2001). The impact of two standards-based mathematics curriculum on student achievement in Massachusetts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(4), 368-398.
28. Schoen, H.L., Cebulla, K.J., Finn, K.F., & Fi, C. (2003). Teacher variables that relate to student achievement when using a standards-based curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(3), 228-259.
29. Swanson, H.L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford Press.
30. Terc. (2008). Investigations in number, data, and space. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Scott Foresman.
31. Uberti, H.Z., Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (2004). Check it off: Individualizing a math algorithm for students with disabilities via self-monitoring checklists. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39(5), 269-275.
32. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2006). 26th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
33. Van Houten, R., & Thompson, C. (1976). The effects of explicit timing on math performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 227-230.
34. Wong, B.Y.L., Harris, K.R., Graham, S., & Butler, D.L. (2003). Cognitive strategy instruction research in learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 383-402). New York: Guildford Press.
35. Woodward, J. (2006). Developing automaticity in multiplication facts: Integrating strategy instruction with timed practice drills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29, 269-289.
36. Woodward, J., Monroe, K., & Baxter, J. (2001). Enhancing student achievement on performance assessments in mathematics. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24(1), 33-46.