Investigation of process performance and fouling mechanisms in micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of nickel-contaminated waters

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 162, Issue 2-3, 2009, Pages 577-587

  Danis, Ummuhan ^a   Aydiner, Coskun ^b  

^a ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b GEBZE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Fouling; Micellar enhanced; Modeling; Nickel; Treatment; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; CELL MEMBRANES; COLLOIDS; ETHERS; FLUXES; FOULING; GELATION; METAL RECOVERY; NICKEL; POROUS MATERIALS; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER POLLUTION;

AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS; CHLORIDE CONTENTS; CONTAMINATED WATERS; DYNAMIC FUNCTIONS; ETHER SULFATES; FOULING MECHANISMS; FOULING MODELS; GEL LAYERS; HIGH REJECTIONS; MEMBRANE FOULING; MEMBRANE PORES; MICELLAR-ENHANCED; MICELLAR-ENHANCED ULTRAFILTRATION; MODELING; NICKEL CONCENTRATIONS; NICKEL REMOVALS; OPERATION TIMES; PROCESS CONDITIONS; PROCESS PERFORMANCES; SHORT TIMES; SURFACTANT ADSORPTIONS; TRANSIENT FLUXES; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES; TREATMENT;

NICKEL ALLOYS;

DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; NICKEL; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FILTRATION; FOULING; NICKEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SURFACTANT; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER POLLUTION;

ADSORPTION; MICELLE; REVIEW; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER CONTAMINATION;

MICELLES; NICKEL; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 57649230948     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.098     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Dunn R.O., Scamehorn F.J., and Christian O.S. Removal of n-alcohols from aqueous streams using micellar enhanced ultrafiltration by cationic surfactant. J. Membr. Sci. 56 (1987) 1
2. Ghosh G., and Bhattacharya P.K. Hexavalent chromium ion removal through micellar enhanced ultrafiltration. J. Chem. Eng. 119 (2006) 45-53
3. Kaya Y., Aydiner C., Barlas H., and Keskinler B. Nanofiltration of single and mixture solutions containing anionics and nonionic surfactants below their critical micelle concentrations (CMCs). J. Membr. Sci. 282 (2006) 401
4. Myers D. Surfaces, Interfaces and Colloids-Principles and Applications. 2nd ed. (1999), John Wiley & Sons, New York
5. Aydiner C., Bayramoglu M., Kara S., Keskinler B., and Ince O. Nickel removal from waters using surfactant-enhanced hybrid PAC/MF process. I. The İnfluence of system-component variables. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) 3926
6. Canizares P., Perez A., Camarillo R., and Linares J.J. A semi-continuous laboratory-scale polymer enhanced ultrafiltration process for the recovery of cadmium and lead from aqueous effluents. J. Membr. Sci. 240 (2004) 197
7. Hankins N., Hilal N., Ogunbiyi O.O., and Azzopardi B. Inverted polarity micellar enhanced ultrafiltration for the treatment of heavy metal polluted wastewater. Desalination 185 (2005) 185
8. Baek K., Kim B.K., Cho H.J., and Yang J.W. Removal characteristics of anionic metals by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. J. Hazard. Mater. B99 (2003) 303
9. 2+ from synthetic wastewater using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration with hollow fiber membrane. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 294 1-3 (2007) 140
10. Juang R.S., Xu Y.Y., and Chen C.L. Separation and removal of metal ions from dilute solutions using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 218 (2003) 257
11. Chhatre A.J., and Marathe K.V. Dynamic analysis and optimization of surfactant dosage in micellar enhanced ultrafiltration of nickel from aqueous streams. Sep. Sci. Technol. 41 (2006) 2755
12. 3+ at low surfactant concentration. J. Membr. Sci. 217 (2003) 181
13. Juang R., and Liang J. Removal of copper and zinc from aqueous sulfate solution with polyacrylic acid by a batch complexation ultrafiltration process. J. Membr. Sci. 82 (1993) 175
14. Huang Y.C., Batchelor B., and Koseoglu S.S. Cross-flow surfactant-based ultrafiltration of heavy metals from waste streams. Sep. Sci. Technol. 29 15 (1994) 1979
15. Scamehorn J.F., Christian S.D., El-sayed D.A., and Uchiyama H. Removal of divalent metal cations and their mixtures from aqueous streams using micellar enhanced ultrafiltration. Sep. Sci. Technol. 297 (1994) 809
16. Li C.W., Liu C.K., and Yen W.S. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) with mixed surfactants for removing Cu(II) ions. Chemosphere 63 (2006) 353
17. Yurlova L., Kryvoruchko A., and Kornilovich B. Removal of Ni(II) ions from wastewater by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Desalination 144 (2002) 255
18. Akita S., Yang L., and Takeuchi H. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of gold(III) with nonionic surfactant. J. Membr. Sci. 133 (1997) 189
19. Iqbal J., Kim H.J., Yang J.S., and Baek K. Removal of arsenic from groundwater by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF). Chemosphere 66 (2007) 970
20. Keskinler B., Danis U., Cakici A., and Akay G. Chromate removal from water using surfactant enhanced crossflow filtration. Sep. Sci. Technol. 32 11 (1997) 1899
21. Gzara L., and Dhahbi M. Removal of chromate anions by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration using cationic surfactants. Desalination 137 (2001) 241
22. Christian S.D., Bhat S.N., Tucker E.E., Scamehorn J.F., and El-Sayed D.A. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of chromate anion from aqueous streams. AIChE J. 34 2 (1988) 189
23. Gwicana S., Vorster N., and Jacobs E. The use of a cationic surfactant for micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of platinum group metal anions. Desalination 199 (2006) 504
24. Aguirre J.L., Garcia V., Pongracz E., and Keiski R. Applicability of membrane technologies for the removal of heavy metals. Desalination 200 (2006) 272
25. Choi Y.K., Lee S.B., Lee D.J., Ishigami Y., and Kajiuchi T. Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration using PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymers. J. Membr. Sci. 148 (1998) 185
26. Baek K., Yang J.S., Kwon T.S., and Yang J.W. Cationic starch-enhanced ultrafiltration for Cr(VI) removal. Desalination 206 (2007) 245
27. AWWA. Membrane Technology Research Committee, recent advances and research needs in membrane fouling. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 97 8 (2005) 79
28. AWWA. Water Desalting and Reuse Committee, membrane desalting technologies. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 81 11 (1989) 30
29. Bayhan Y.K., Keskinler B., Cakici A., Levent M., and Akay G. Removal of divalent heavy metal mixtures from water by Saccharomyces cerevisiae using crossflow microfiltration. Water Res. 35 9 (2001) 2191
30. Hasar H. Adsorption of nickel(II) from aqueous solution onto activated carbon prepared from almond husk. J. Hazard. Mater. B97 (2003) 49
31. Demirbas E., Kobya M., Oncel M.S., and Sencan S. Removal of Ni(II) from aqueous solution by adsorption onto hazelnut shell activated carbon: equilibrium studies. Bioresour. Technol. 84 (2002) 291
32. Archer A.C., Mendes A.M., and Boaventura R.A.R. Separation of anionic surfactant by nanofiltration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33 (1999) 2758
33. Lear J.B., and Mellon M.G. Absorptiometric determination of nickel with beta-mecaptopropionic acid. Anal. Chem. 25 9 (1953) 1411
34. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). D3049-89-Standard Test Method for Synthetic Anionic Ingredient by Cationic Titration (2003), ASTM, Philadelphia, PA
35. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology (1991), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands
36. Turano E., Curcio S., De Paola M.G., Calabrò V., and Iorio G. An integrated centrifugation-ultrafiltration system in the treatment of olive mill wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. 209 (2002) 519
37. Lee Y., and Clark M.M. Modeling of flux decline during crossflow ultrafiltration of colloidal suspensions. J. Membr. Sci. 149 (1998) 181-202
38. Hermia J. Constant pressure blocking filtration laws-application to power-law non-Newtonian fluids. Trans. IChemE. 60 (1982) 183
39. Bolton G.R., Boesch A.W., and Lazzara M.J. The effects of flow rate on membrane capacity: development and application of adsorptive membrane fouling models. J. Membr. Sci. 279 (2006) 625