New predictive model for monitoring bone remodeling

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 95, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 9-24

  Bougherara, Habiba ^a   Klika, Václav ^b,c   Maršík, František ^c   Mařík, Ivo A ^d   Yahia, L'Hocine ^e  

^a RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b CZECH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^c INSTITUTE OF THERMOMECHANICS   (Czech Republic)

^d CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^e ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bone biochemistry; Bone remodeling; Dynamical loading; Metabolic factors; Open system thermodynamics

Indexed keywords

ANSYS SOFTWARE; BONE DENSITY; BONE LOSS; BONE REMODELING; CHEMICAL KINETICS; CLINICAL STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; CURRENT MODELS; DYNAMIC PROCESS; DYNAMICAL LOADING; FEMORAL HEADS; FUNCTIONAL ADAPTATION; GOVERNING EQUATIONS; INNER STRUCTURE; IRREVERSIBLE THERMODYNAMICS; MATLAB- SOFTWARE; MECHANICAL LOADING; MECHANICAL STIMULUS; MEDULLARY CANALS; METABOLIC FACTORS; OPEN SYSTEM THERMODYNAMICS; PREDICTIVE MODELS; PROXIMAL FEMUR; SELF-ORGANIZING SYSTEMS; STEADY STATE; STRAIN ENERGY DENSITY;

BIOCHEMISTRY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; LOADING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METABOLISM; OPEN SYSTEMS; THERMODYNAMICS;

BONE;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MONITORING; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE MARROW; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; BONE REGENERATION; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRUCTURE; CELL REGENERATION; CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORTICAL BONE; ENERGY; ENTROPY; FEMUR; FEMUR HEAD; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MICHAELIS MENTEN KINETICS; MONONUCLEAR CELL; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOBLAST; OSTEOCLAST; OSTEOLYSIS; PREDICTION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; STEADY STATE; STIMULUS; THERMODYNAMICS; TRABECULAR BONE; VIRTUAL REALITY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; MECHANICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; WEIGHT BEARING; YOUNG MODULUS; BONE STRESS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH;

ANIMALS; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; FEMUR; HUMANS; MECHANICAL PHENOMENA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OSTEOBLASTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THERMODYNAMICS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 77956468893     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32679     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Buford A, Goswami T. Review of wear mechanisms in hip implants: Paper I - General. Mater Des 2004;25:385-393. (Pubitemid 38531625)
2. Cristofolini L. A critical analysis of stress shielding evaluation of hip prostheses. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1997;25:409-483. (Pubitemid 28090697)
3. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Rietbergen BV. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992;274:124-134.
4. Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. J Biomech 1992;25:1425-1441.
5. Taylor M, Verdonschot N, Huiskes R, Zioupos P. A combined finite element method and continuum damage mechanics approach to simulate the in vitro fatigue behavior of human cortical bone. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 1999;10:841-846.
6. Mullender M, Huiskes R. Proposal for the regulatory mechanism of Wolff's law. J Orthop Res 1995;13:503-512.
7. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Grootenboer HJ, Dalstra M, Fudala B, Slooff TJ. Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J Biomech 1987;20:1135-1150. (Pubitemid 18010111)
8. Levenston M, Carter DR. An energy dissipation-based model for damage stimulated bone adaptation. J Biomech 1998;31:579-586.
9. Hernandez C, Beaupré GS, Carter DR. A model of mechanobiologic and metabolic influences on bone adaptation. J Rehabil ResDev 2000;37:235-244.
10. Carter D, Beaupré GS. Skeletal Function and Form: Mechanobiology of Skeletal Development, Aging, and Regeneration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
11. Rouhi G, Epstein M, Sudak L, Herzog W. Modeling bone resorption using mixture theory with chemical reactions. J Mech Mater Struct 2007;2:1141-1155.
12. Lemaire V, Tobin FL, Greller LD, Cho CR, Suva LJ. Modeling the interactions between osteoblast and osteoclast activities in bone remodeling. J Theor Biol 2004;229:293-309.
13. Huiskes R, Ruimerman R, van Lenthe GH, Janssen JD. Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature 2000;405:704-706. (Pubitemid 30428659)
14. Prendergast PJ, Taylor D. Prediction of bone adaptation using damage accumulation. J Biomech 1994;27:1067-1076.
15. Levenston ME, Carter DR. An energy dissipation-based model for damage stimulated bone adaptation. J Biomech 1998;31:579-586.
16. Frost HM. Changing concepts in skeletal physiology: Wolff's law, the mechanostat, and the "Utah Paradigm". Am J Hum Biol 1998;10:599-605.
17. Hernandez CJ, Beaupre GS, Carter DR. A model of mechanobiologic and metabolic influences on bone adaptation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000;37:235-244.
18. Ruimerman R, Huiskes R, Van Lenthe GH, Janssen JD. A computer-simulation model relating bone-cell metabolism, to mechanical adaptation of trabecular bone. Comput Meth Biomed Bioeng 2001;4:433-448.
19. Kroll MH. Parathyroid hormone temporal effects on bone formation and resorption. Bull Math Biol 2000;62:163-188.
20. Rattanakul C, Lenbury Y, Krishnamara N, Wollkind DJ. Modeling of bone formation and resorption mediated by parathyroid hormone: Response to estrogen/PTH therapy. BioSystems 2003;70:55-72.
21. Komarova SV, Smith RJ, Dixon SJ, Sims SM, Wahl LM. Mathematical model predicts a critical role for osteoclast autocrine regulation in the control of bone remodeling. Bone 2003;33:206-215.
22. Ehrlich PJ, Lanyon LE. Mechanical strain and bone cell function: A review. Osteoporos Int 2002;13:688-700.
23. Klika V, Maršík F. Bone remodeling driven by dynamic loading and drug treatment. Presented at Human Biomechanics Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, 2008.
24. Bougherara H, Bureau MN, Yahia L. Bone remodeling in a new biomimetic polymer-composite hip stem. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A 2010;92:164-174.
25. Petrtýl M, Danešová J. Principles of bone remodelling - The limit cycles of bone remodelling. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2001;3:75-91.
26. Bejan A, Marden JH. Unifying constructal theory for scale effects in running, swimming and flying. J Exp Biol 2006;209:238-248. (Pubitemid 43226747)
27. Michaelis L, Menten ML. Kinetik der Invertinwirkung. Biochem Z 1913;49:333-369.
28. Ignetik R, Deakin MAB. Asymptotic analysis of the Michaelis-Menten reaction equations. Bull Math Biol 1981;43:375-388. (Pubitemid 11021948)
29. Nicolis G, Prigogine I. Selforganization in Nonequilibrium Systems. New York: Wiley; 1977.
30. Öttinger HC. Beyond Equilibrium Thermodynamics. Hoboken, New Jersy: John Wiley; 2005. p 656.
31. Cowin SC, Weinbaum S, Zeng Y. A case for bone canaliculi as the anatomical site of strain generated potentials. J Biomech 1995;28:1281-1297.
32. Onsager L. Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes I. Phys Rev 1931;37:405-426.
33. Onsager L. Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes II. Phys Rev 1931;38:2265-2279.
34. Jagers P, Klebaner F. Random variation and concentration effects in PCR. J Theor Biol 2003;224:299-304.
35. Bejan A. Shape and Structure from Engineering to Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
36. Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ. Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical, 3rd ed. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry; 2007.
37. Muller P. Glossary of terms used in physical organic chemistry Pure Appl Chem 1994;66:1077-1184.
38. Heineken F, Tsuchiya HM, Aris R. On the mathematical status of the pseudo-steady state hypothesis of biochemical kinetics. Math Biosci 1967;1:95-113.
39. Klika V. Matematická analýza a numerická simulace remodelačních procesův kostech [Translation: Mathematical and numerical analysis of differential equations of bone remodeling]. M.Sc. Thesis, Prague, Czech Republic, CTU Prague, 2006.
40. Abe H, Hayashi K, Sato M. Data Book on Mechanical Properties of Living Cells, Tissues, and Organs. New York: Springer; 1996. p 436.
41. Kuhl E, Balle F. Computaional modeling of hip replacement surgery: Total hip replacement vs. hip resurfacing. Technische Mecanik 2005;25:107-114.
42. Sadd MH. Elasticity: Theory, Applications and Numerics. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press; 2005.
43. Daniel I, Ishai O. Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
44. Carter DR, Orr TE, Fyhrie DP. Relationships between loading history and femoral cancellous bone architecture. J Biomech 1989;22:231-244.
45. Lotz JC, Gerhart TN, Hayes WC. Mechanical properties of metaphyseal bone in the proximal femur. J Biomech 1991;24:317-329.
46. Goulet RW, Goldstein SA, Ciarelli MJ, Kuhn JL, Brown MB, Feldkamp LA. The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 1994;27:375-389.
47. Kopperdahl DL, Keaveny TM. Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. J Biomech 1998;31:601-608.
48. Ciarelli TE, Fyhrie DP, Schaffler MB, Goldstein SA. Variations in three-dimensional cancellous bone architecture of the proximal femur in female hip fractures and in controls. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:32-40.
49. Helgason B, Perilli E, Schileo E, Taddei F, Brynjólfsson S, Viceconti M. Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: A literature review. Clin Biomech 2008;23:135-146.
50. Torcasio A, van Lenthe GH, Van Oosterwyck H. The importance of loading frequency, rate and vibration for enhancing bone adaptation and implant osseointegration. Eur Cells Mater 2008;16:56-68.
51. Rubin C, Lanyon L. Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcif Tissue Int 1985;37:411-417. (Pubitemid 15015324)
52. Truong L-H, Kuliwaba J, Tsangari H, Fazzalari N. Differential gene expression of bone anabolic factors and trabecular bone architectural changes in the proximal femoral shaft of primary hip osteoarthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8:R188.
53. Ehrlich P, Lanyon LE. Mechanical strain and bone cell function: A review. Osteop Int 2002;13:688-700.
54. Jaworski ZFG, Uhthoff HK. Reversibility of nontraumatic disuse osteoporosis during its active phase. Bone 1986;7:431-439.
55. Nagel A, Fernholz F, Kibele C, Rosenbaum D. Long distance running increases plantar pressures beneath the metatarsal heads: A barefoot walking investigation of 200 marathon runners. Gait Posture 2008;27:152-155.
56. Theis J, Ball C. Medium-term results of cementless hydroxyapatite-coated primary total hip arthroplasty: A clinical and radiological review. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2003;11:159-165.
57. Gupta S, New AMR, Taylor M. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head. Clin Biomech 2006;21:594-602. (Pubitemid 43816751)
58. Schiltz C, Marty C, De Vernejoul MC, Geoffroy V. Inhibition of osteoblastic metalloproteinases in mice prevents bone loss induced by oestrogen deficiency. J Cell Biochem 2008;104:1803-1817.
59. Judex S, Zernicke RF. High-impact exercise and growing bone: Relation between high strain rates and enhanced bone formation. J Appl Physiol 2000;88:2183-2191.
60. Adami S, Gatti D, Viapiana O, Fiore CE, Nuti R, Luisetto G, Ponte M, Rossini M; BONTURNO Study Group. Physical activity and bone turnover markers: A cross-sectional and a longitudinal study. Calcif Tissue Int 2008;83:388-392.
61. Carter DR. Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 1984;36(Suppl 1):S19-S24. (Pubitemid 14043310)
62. Van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R, Eckstein F, Ruegsegger P. Trabecular bone tissue strains in the healthy and osteoporotic human femur. J Bone Miner Res 2003;18:1781-1788.
63. Gilsanz V, Wren TAL, Sanchez M, Dorey F, Judex S, Rubin C. Low-level. High-frequency mechanical signals enhance musculoskeletal development of young women with low BMD. J Bone Miner Res 2006;21:1464-1474.
64. Passeri G, Vescovini R, Sansoni P, Galli C, Franceschi C, Passeri M. Calcium metabolism and vitamin D in the extreme longevity. Exp Gerontol 2008;43:79-87.
65. Viljakainen HT, Väisänen M, Kemi V, Rikkonen T, Kröger H, Laitinen EK, Rita H, Lamberg-Allardt C. Wintertime vitamin D supplementation inhibits seasonal variation of calcitropic hormones and maintains bone turnover in healthy men. J Bone Miner Res 2009;24:346-352.
66. Kitazawa R, Imai Y, Fukase M, Fujita T. Effects of continuous infusion of parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related peptide on rat bone in vivo: comparative study by histomorphometry. Bone Miner 1991;12:157-166.
67. Watson PH, Fraher LJ, Kisiel M, Desousa D, Hendy G, Hodsman AB. Enhanced osteoblast development after continuous infusion of hPTH(1-84) in the rat. Bone 1999;24:89-94.
68. Parfitt AM. The actions of parathyroid hormone on bone: Relation to bone remodeling and turnover, calcium homeostasis, and metabolic bone diseases: Part II of IV parts: PTH and bone cells: Bone turnover and plasma calcium regulation. Metabolism 1976;25:909-955.
69. Du P, Ye Y, Seitz PK, Bi LG, Li H, Wang C, Simmons DJ, Cooper CW. Endogenous parathyroid hormone-related peptide enhances proliferation and inhibits differentiation in the osteoblast-like cell line ROS 17/2.8. Bone 2000;26:429-436. (Pubitemid 30204462)
70. Huiskes R, Boeklagen R. Mathematical shape optimization of hip prosthesis design. J Biomech 1989;22:793-804.
71. Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. J Biomech 1992;25:1425-1441.
72. Cowin S, Hegedus DH. Bone remodeling I: Theory of adaptive elasticity. J Elasticity 1976;6:313-326.
73. Bland R. Steroid hormone receptor expression and action in bone. Clin Sci (Lond) 2000;98:217-240. (Pubitemid 30105532)
74. Schmidt SM, McCready MJ, Ostafin AE. Effect of oscillating fluid shear on solute transport in cortical bone. J Biomech 2005;38:2337-2343.
75. Glansdorff P, Prigogine I. Thermodynamics Theory of Structure, Stability and Fluctuations. London: Wiley-Interscience; 1971.