Hybridization and nonprofit organizations: The governance challenge

Policy and Society

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 219-229

  Smith, Steven Rathgeb ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Accountability; Hybrid nonprofits; Hybridization; Nonprofit governance

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956420691     PISSN: 14494035     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alter, K. S. (2007). Social enterprise typology. Retrieved 20.11.09. http://www.virtueventures.com/files/setypology.pdf.
2. Arndt M., Bigelow B. Presenting structural innovation in an institutional environment: Hospitals' use of impression management. Administrative Science Quarterly 2000, 45(3):494-522.
3. Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy 2010, Palgrave Macmillan, London. D. Billis (Ed.).
4. Bornstein D. How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas 2007, Oxford University Press, New York.
5. Bovaird T. Developing new forms of partnership with the >market(in the procurement of public services. Public Administration 2006, 84(1):81-102.
6. Bovaird T. Public-private partnerships: From contested concept to prevalent practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences 2004, 70(2):199-215.
7. Brandsen T., van de Donk W., Putters K. Griffins or Chameleons? Hybridity as a permanent and inevitable characteristic of the third sector. International Journal of Public Administration 2005, 28(9/10):749-766.
8. Bratt R.G., Rohe W. Challenges and dilemmas facing community development corporations in the United States. Community Development Journal 2005, January, 42(1):63-78.
9. New public management: The transformation of ideas and practice 2001, Ashgate, Aldershot. T. Christensen, P. Laegreid (Eds.).
10. Transcending new public management: The transformation of public sector reforms 2009, Ashgate, Aldershot. T. Christensen, P. Laegreid (Eds.).
11. Chung A. Bridging sectors: Partnerships between nonprofits and private developers 2004, Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/publications/communitydevelopment/w04-8_chung.pdf.
12. Crutchfield L.R., Grant H.M. Forces for good: The six practices of high-impact nonprofits 2008, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
13. D'Aunno T., Sutton R., Price R. Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: A study of drug abuse treatment centers. Academy of Management Journal 1991, 34:636-661.
14. Dees J.G. Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review 1998 January-February, 55-67.
15. Donahue J.D., Zeckhauser R.J. Public-private collaboration. The Oxford handbook of public policy 2007, 496-525. Oxford University Press, New York. M.R. Moran, R. Goodin (Eds.).
16. Dunleavy P., Margetts H., Bastow S., Tinkler J. New public management is dead-Long live digital era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2005, 16:467-494.
17. Elkington J., Hartigan P. The power of unreasonable people: How social entrepreneurs create markets that change the world 2008, Harvard Business Press, Boston.
18. Enterprise Community Partners Every home counts: 2008 annual report 2008, http://www.enterprisecommunity.org/about/annual_report/2008_annual_report.pdf.
19. Evers A., Laville J.L. Social services by social enterprises. On the possible contributions of hybrid organisations and a civil society. The third sector in Europe 2004, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton, pp. 237-256. A. Evers, J. Laville (Eds.).
20. Evers A. Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organizations: Changes in the governance and provision of social services. International Journal of Public Administration 2005, 28(9/10):737-748.
21. Fligstein N. The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919-1979. American Sociological Review 1985, 50(3):377-391.
22. Foster W., Bradach J. Should nonprofits seek profits?. Harvard Business Review 2005, 83(2):92-100.
23. Goldsmith S., Eggers W. Governing by network 2006, Brookings, Washington, DC.
24. Goldsmith S. The power of social innovation: How civic entrepreneurs ignite community networks for good 2010, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
25. Hammack D. The making of the nonprofit sector 1998, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.
26. Hansmann H. The theory of the nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal 1980, 89:835-898.
27. Heskett, J. L. (2007). Manchester Bidwell Corporation (A). Harvard Business School. Case #: 9-806-111.
28. Hwang H., Powell W.W. The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly 2009, 54:268-298.
29. Hyde C. The ideational system of social movement agencies: An examination of feminist health centers. Human service organizations 1992, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 121-144. Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.).
30. Joldersma C., Winter V. Strategic management in hybrid organizations. Public Management Review 2002, 4(1):83-100.
31. Shelter and society: Theory, research, and policy for nonprofit housing 1998, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY. C.T. Koebel (Ed.).
32. Koppell J.G.S. The politics of quasi-government: Hybrid organizations and the dynamics of bureaucratic control 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Lynn, L. E., Jr. & Smith, S. R. (2010). The performance challenge in nonprofit organizations. Unpublished draft.
34. Meyer J.W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 1977, 83(2):340-363.
35. Minkoff D. The emergence of hybrid organizational forms: Combining identity based service provision and political action. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 2002, 31:377-401.
36. O'Regan K.M., Quigley J.M. Federal policy and the rise of nonprofit housing providers. Journal of Housing Research 2000, 11(2):297-317.
37. Perry J., Rainey H.G. The public-private distinction in organizational theory. Academy of Management Review 1988, 13:182-201.
38. Powell W.W., DiMaggio P.J. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 1983, 48:147-160.
39. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis 1991, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. W.W. Powell, P.J. DiMaggio (Eds.).
40. Reich J., Crawshaw-Lewis S., Gregory D. Public development authorities 2003, Preston Gates and Ellis, Seattle, http://www.mrsc.org/subjects/econ/PDA-IB516.pdf.
41. The tools of government 2002, Oxford University Press, New York. L.M. Salamon (Ed.).
42. Seidman H. Government-sponsored enterprise in the United States. The new political economy: The public use of the private sector 1975, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 83-108. B.L.R. Smith (Ed.).
43. Skelcher C. Public-private partnerships and hybridity. The Oxford handbook of public management 2005, 347-370. Oxford University Press, New York. E. Ferlie, L.E. Lynn, C. Pollitt (Eds.).
44. Skelcher C. The appointed state: Quasi-government organisations and democracy 1998, Open University Press, Buckingham.
45. Skelcher C. What do we mean when we talk about hybrids?. Paper for network research workshop 2009, 26 February.
46. Smith S.R., Lipsky M. Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting 1993, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
47. Smith S.R. Government financing of nonprofit activity. Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict 2006, Urban Institute, Washington, DC, pp. 219-256. E.T. Boris, C. Eugene Steuerle (Eds.).
48. Sosin M., Smith S.R., Hilton T., Jordan L. Temporary crises and policy change: The case of state substance abuse systems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2010, 20(3):539-575.
49. Stoecker R. The CDC model of urban redevelopment: A critique and an alternative. Journal of Urban Affairs 1997, 19(1):1-22.
50. York, P. (2009). The sustainability formula: How nonprofit organizations can thrive in the emerging economy. Retrieved 24.02.10.