Whose sustainability? Environmental domination and Sen's Capability Approach

Oxford Development Studies

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 289-307

  Scholtes, Fabian ^a  

^a Research and Development   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTINGENT VALUATION; DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 77956416589     PISSN: 13600818     EISSN: 14699966     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13600818.2010.505683     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alkire, S. (2002) Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
2. Alkire, S. (2006) Public debate and value construction in Sen's approach, in: A. Kaufman (Ed.) Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems (New York: Routledge).
3. Anand, S. & Sen, A. K. (2000) Human development and economic sustainability, World Development, 28(12), pp. 2029-2049.
4. Blackburn, J. & Holland, J. (Eds) (1998) Whose Voice? Participatory Research and Policy Change (London: IT Publications).
5. Constantini, V. & Monni, S. (2005) Globalization and sustainable human development. Sorting out the causality. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on the Capability Approach (Annual Meeting of the Human Development and Capability Association), Paris.
6. Crewe, E. & Harrison, E. (1998) Whose Development? An Ethnography of Aid (London: Zed).
7. Crocker, D. A. (2006) Sen and deliberative democracy, in: A. Kaufman (Ed.) Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems (New York: Routledge).
8. Deneulin, S. (2005) Promoting human freedoms under conditions of inequalities: a procedural framework, Journal of Human Development, 6(1), pp. 75-92.
9. Distaso, A. (2004) Well-being and quality of life in EU countries through a multidimensional index of sustainability. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on the Capability Approach (Annual Meeting of the Human Development and Capability Association), Pavia, Italy.
10. Duraiappah, A. K. with the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) (2004) Exploring the Links. Human Well-being, Poverty, and Ecosystem Services (Manitoba: IISD).
11. Foucault, M. (1987) The ethic of care of the self as a practice of freedom, interview with Michel Foucault, by Raúl Fornet-Betancourt, Helmut Becker & Alfredo Gomez-Muller, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 12(2/3), pp. 112-131.
12. Heyward, J. C. (2007) Capabilities-the environmentalist's metric? Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on the Capability Approach (Annual Meeting of the Human Development and Capability Association), New York.
13. Holland, A. (1997) Substitutability: or, why strong sustainability is weak and absurdly strong sustainability is not absurd, in: J. Foster (Ed.) Valuing Nature? Economics, Ethics and Environment (London: Routledge).
14. Holland, B. (2008) Justice and the environment in Nussbaum's "Capabilities Approach". Why sustainable ecological capacity is a meta-capability, Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), pp. 319-332.
15. Kamsler, V. (2006) Attending to nature. Capabilities and the environment, in: A. Kaufman (Ed.) Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems (New York: Routledge).
16. Keat, R. (1997) Values and preferences in neo-classical environmental economics, in: J. Foster (Ed.) Valuing Nature? Economics, Ethics and Environment (London: Routledge).
17. Leach, M., Scoones, I. & Stirling, A. (2007) Pathways to Sustainability: An Overview of the STEPS Centre Approach, STEPS Approach Paper (Brighton: STEPS Centre).
18. Levrel, H. (2003) Pauvreté, vulnérabilité, et ressources renouvelables. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on the Capability Approach (Annual Meeting of the Human Development and Capability Association), Pavia, Italy.
19. Luhmann, N. (1995) Social Systems (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
20. MacIntyre, A. (1988) Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).
21. Makropoulos, M. (2004) Kontingenz. Aspekte einer theoretischen Semantik der Moderne, Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 45, pp. 369-399.
22. Mathai, M. (2004) Exploring freedom in a global ecology. Sen's Capability Approach as a solution for environmental deterioration. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on the Capability Approach (Annual Meeting of the Human Development and Capability Association), Pavia, Italy.
23. Mehta, L. (2007) Whose scarcity? Whose property? The case of water in western India, Land Use Policy, 24, pp. 654-663.
24. Neumayer, E. (1999) Weak vs. Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
25. Nussbaum, M. C. (2003) Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice, Feminist Economics, 9, pp. 33-59.
26. Nussbaum, M. C. & Sen, A. K. (1989) Internal criticism and Indian rationalist tradition, in: M. Krausz (Ed.) Relativism. Interpretation and Confrontation (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).
27. Page, E. A. (2007) Intergenerational equality of what: welfare, resources or capabilities? Environmental Politics, 16(3), pp. 453-469.
28. Robeyns, I. (2003) Sen's capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities, Feminist Economics, 9(2/3), pp. 61-92.
29. Robeyns, I. (2005) The Capability Approach: a theoretical survey, Journal of Human Development, 6(1), pp. 93-114.
30. Sen, A. K. (1985) Commodities and Capabilities (Amsterdam: North Holland).
31. Sen, A. K. (1993a) Capability and well-being, in: M. Nussbaum & A. K. Sen (Eds) The Quality of Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
32. Sen, A. K. (1993b) Markets and freedoms: achievements and limitations of the market mechanism in promoting individual freedoms, Oxford Economic Papers, 45, pp. 519-541.
33. Sen, A. K. (1995a) Environmental valuation and social choice: contingent valuation and the market analogy, Japanese Economic Review, 64(1), pp. 23-37.
34. Sen, A. K. (1995b) Rationality and social choice, American Economic Review, 85, pp. 1-24.
35. Sen, A. K. (1998) Reason before Identity. The Romanes Lecture (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
36. Sen, A. K. (1999a) Development as Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
37. Sen, A. K. (1999b) Democracy as a universal value, Journal of Democracy, 10(3), pp. 3-17.
38. Sen, A. K. (2000) Consequential evaluation and practical reason, Journal of Philosophy, 98(9), pp. 477-502.
39. Sen, A. K. (2003a) Continuing the conversation. Amartya Sen talks with Bina Agarwal, Jane Humphries & Ingrid Robeyns, Feminist Economics, 9(2/3), pp. 319-332.
40. Sen, A. K. (2003b) What difference can ethics make? International Meeting on "Ethics and Development" of the Interamerican Development Bank, available at: www.iadb.org/etica/documentos/dc_sen_queimp-i.pdf (accessed 25 March 2005).
41. Sen, A. K. (2003c) Environment, resources, and human values, available at: www.deart.unifi.it/CEDIP/html/ body_inglese.html (accessed 3 March 2003).
42. Sen, A. K. (2004a) Capabilities, lists, and public reasoning: continuing the conversation, Feminist Economics, 10(3), pp. 77-80.
43. Sen, A. K. (2004b) Why we should preserve the spotted owl, The London Review of Books, available at: www.lrb.co.uk/v26/n03/sen_01.html (accessed 1 February 2005).
44. Sen, A. K. (2004c) Elements of a theory of human rights, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32(4), pp. 315-356.
45. Sen, A. K. (2004d) How does culture matter?, in: V. Rao & M. Walton (Eds) Culture and Public Action (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
46. Thomas, A. (2000) Development as practice in a liberal capitalist world, Journal of International Development, 12, pp. 773-787.
47. Yamaguchi, H. (2003) Whose sustainable development? An analysis of Japanese foreign aid policy and funding for energy sector projects, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 23(4), pp. 302-310.
48. Weikard, H.-P. (1999) Wahlfreiheit fur zukunftige Generationen. Neue Grundlagen fur eine Ressourcenokonomik (Marburg: Metropolis Press).