Granger causality analysis of human cell-cycle gene expression profiles

Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Nagarajan, Radhakrishnan ^a   Upreti, Meenakshi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

functional relationships; gene expression; Granger causality

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIVARIATE ANALYSIS; CELL CYCLE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GRANGER CAUSALITY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE; METHODOLOGY;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENES, CDC; HUMANS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 77956412225     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15446115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1555     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barabasi, A-L. and Oltvai, Z.N. (2004) Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nature Reviews Genetics 5, 101-113.
2. Becksei, A et al. (2001) Positive feedback in eukaryotic gene networks: cell differentiation by graded to binary response conversion. EMBO Journal 20, 2528-2535
3. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 57, 289-300.
4. Brovelli, A. et al. (2004). Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: Directional influences revealed by Granger causality. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 101, 9849-9854.
5. Elowitz, M.B. et al. (2002) Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell. Science, 297(5584), 1183-6.
6. Friedman, N. (2004). Inferring Cellular Networks Using Probabilistic Graphical Models, Science 303, 799-805.
7. Friedman, et al. (2006) Linking Stochastic Dynamics to Population Distribution: An Analytical Framework of Gene Expression. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 168302.
8. Fujita et al. (2007a) Time-varying modeling of gene expression regulatory networks using the wavelet dynamic vector autoregressive method. Bioinformatics 23(13), 1623-1630.
9. Fujita et al. (2007b) Modeling gene expression regulatory networks with the sparse vector autoregressive model. BMC SystBiol.1, 39.
10. Fujita et al. (2008) Modeling Nonlinear Gene Regulatory Networks from Time Series Gene Expression Data. J. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology 6(5), 961-979.
11. Gardner, T.S. et al. (2003). Inferring genetic networks and identifying compound mode of action via expression profiling. Science 301, 102-105.
12. Granger, C.W.J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica 37(3), 424-438.
13. Gregoriou, G.G. et al. (2009) High-Frequency, Long-Range Coupling Between Prefrontal and Visual Cortex During Attention. Science 324, 1207-1210.
14. Guo, S. et al. (2008). Uncovering Interactions in the Frequency Domain. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4(5): e1000087.
15. Hamilton, J.D. (1994). Time Series Analysis, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
16. Kaern, M. et al. (2005) Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes. Nature Reviews Genetics. 6, 451-464.
17. Kitano, H. (2002). Systems Biology: A Brief Overview. Science 295, 1662-1664.
18. Lozano et al. (2009) Grouped graphical Granger modeling for gene expression regulatory networks discovery, Bioinformatics 25, i110-i118.
19. Lutkepohl, H (2006) New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
20. Milo, R. et al. (2002) Network Motifs: Simple Building Blocks of Complex Networks. Science 298, 824-827.
21. Mukhopadhyay, N.D. and Chatterjee, S. (2007) Causality and pathway search in microarray time series experiment. Bioinformatics. 23(4), 442-9.
22. Nagarajan, R. and Upreti, M. (2008) Comment on causality and pathway search in microarray time series experiment. Bioinformatics, 24(7), 1029-1032.
23. Nagarajan, R. (2009) A note on inferring acyclic network structures using Granger causality tests. Int. J. Biostatistics 5, 1.
24. Nagarajan, R. (2009) Power-Law Signatures and Patchiness in Genechip Oligonucleotide Microarrays. Studies in Computational Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, 359-377.
25. Okoniewski MJ, Miller CJ (2006) Hybridization interactions between probesets in short oligo microarrays lead to spurious correlations. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 276.
26. Seth et al. (2006) Theories and measures of consciousness: An extended framework. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10799-10804.
27. Sridharan, D. et al. (2008) A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105(34), 12569-12574
28. Tu, Y. et al. (2002) Quantitative noise analysis for gene expression microarray experiments, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(22), 14031-14036.
29. Ueda, H.R. et al. (2004) Universality and flexibility in gene expression from bacteria to human. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 16(101), 3765-9
30. Whitfield, M.L. et al. (2002) Identification of genes periodically expressed in the human cell cycle and their expression in tumors. Mol. Biol. Cell. 13(6), 1977-2000.
31. Zu, C and Feng, J. (2009) Granger causality vs. dynamic Bayesian network inference: a comparative study. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 122.