Discarding the 'basic science/applied science' dichotomy: A Knowledge Utilization Triangle classification system of research journals

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 61, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1842-1852

  Tijssen, Robert J W ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION DOMAINS; APPLIED RESEARCH; BASIC RESEARCH; CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM; EMPIRICAL DATA; KNOWLEDGE APPLICATION; KNOWLEDGE UTILIZATION; RESEARCH JOURNALS; RESEARCH PAPERS; SCHOLARLY JOURNALS; SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS; TREND ANALYSIS; WEB OF SCIENCE;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

RESEARCH;

EID: 77956374558     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21366     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bailey, K. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
2. Boyack, K., Klavans, R., & B̈rner, K. (2005). Mapping the Backbone of Science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374.
3. Brooks, H. (1980). Basic and applied research. In Categories of scientific research (pp. 14-18). Washington DC: National Science Foundation.
4. Brusoni, S., & Geuna, A. (2003). An international comparison of sectoral knowledge bases: Persistence and integration in the pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 32(10), 1897-1912.
5. Falk, C. (1973). An operational, policy-oriented research categorization scheme. Research Policy, 2(2), 186-202.
6. Godin, B. (1996). Research and the practice of publication in industries. Research Policy, 25(4), 587-606.
7. Godin, B. (2003). Measuring science: Is there 'basic research' without statistics? Social Science Information, 42(1), 57-90.
8. Hamilton, K. (2003). Subfield and level classification of journals (CHI Report No. 2012-R). Cherry Hill, NJ: CHI Research.
9. Hicks, D., & Hamilton, K. (1999). Real numbers. Issues in Science and Technology, 15(4), 74-75.
10. Hicks, D., & Katz, J. S. (1996). Where is science going? Science, Technology & Human Values, 21(4), 379-406.
11. Langenberg, D. (1980). Distinctions between basic and applied research. In Categories of scientific research (pp. 32-36). Washington DC: National Science Foundation.
12. Lewison, G., & Paraje, G. (2004). The classification of biomedical journals by research level. Scientometrics, 60(2), 145-157.
13. Lewison, G., & Wilcox-Jay, K. (2003). Getting biomedical research into practice: The citations from UK clinical guidelines. In J. Gohua, R. Rousseau, & W. Yishan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 152-160). Beijing, China: Dalian University of Technology Press.
14. Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348-362.
15. Lim, K. (2004). The relationship between research and innovation in the semiconductor and pharmaceutical industries (1981-1997). Research Policy, 33(2), 287-321.
16. Narin, F., & Rozek, R. (1988). Bibliometric analysis of bibliometric analysis of United States pharmaceutical industry research performance. Research Policy, 17(3), 139-154.
17. Noma, E. (1986). Subject classification and influence weights for 3, 000 journals. Cherry Hill, NJ: CHI Research/Computer Horizons.
18. OECD (2002). Frascati manual. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
19. Reagan, M. (1967). Basic and applied research: A meaningful distinction? Science, 155(3768), 1383-1386.
20. Rothschild, L. (1972). Forty-five varieties of research (and development). Nature, 239, 373-378.
21. Stokes, D. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington DC: Brookings Institutional Press.
22. Tijssen, R. J. W. (2004). Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge? Global trends in the output of corporate research articles. Research Policy, 33(5), 709-733.
23. Tijssen, R. J. W., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Van Wijk, E. (2009). Benchmarking university-industry research cooperation worldwide: Performance measurements and indicators based on co-authorship data for the world's largest universities. Research Evaluation, 18(1), 13-24.
24. Tijssen, R. J. W., & Van Looy, B. (2009). Production of data to analyze university references found in patent documents by geographic origin. Third report for IPTS/ERAWATCHNETWORKASBL (EC Framework Service Contract Nr-150176-2005-F1SC-BE). Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University/Catholic University of Leuven.
25. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (in press). Software survey: VO Sviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics.
26. Varma, R. (2000). Changing research cultures in US industry. Science, Technology and Human Values, 25(4), 395-416.