Digital readers: The next chapter in E-book reading and response

Reading Teacher

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 15-22

  Larson, Lotta C ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Article; Childhood; Comprehension; Digital; Literature; Special needs

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956371092     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RT.64.1.2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bearne, E. (2005). Multimodal texts: What they are and how children use them. In J. Evans (Ed.), Literacy moves on: Popular culture, new technologies, and critical literacy in the elementary classroom (pp. 1329). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
2. Booth, D.W. (2006). Reading doesnt matter anymore: Shattering the myths of literacy. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
3. Burrell, C., & Trushell, J. (1997). "Eye-candy" in "interactive books"A wholesome diet? Reading, 31 (2), 36.
4. Dekker, M.M. (1991). Books, reading, and response: A teacherresearcher tells a story. The New Advocate, 4 (1), 3746.
5. Eagleton, M.B., & Dobler, E. (2007). Reading the web: Strategies for Internet inquiry. New York: Guilford.
6. Fasimpaur, K. (2004). E-books in schools: Check out the reasons why e-books are gaining in popularity in K-12 schools. Media & Methods, 40 (5), 12.
7. Glasgow, J.N. (1996). Its my turn! Part II: Motivating young readers using CD-ROM storybooks. Learning and Leading With Technology, 24 (4), 1822.
8. Goldsborough, R. (2009). The latest in books and the Internet. Tech Directions, 68 (10), 11.
9. Hancock, M.R. (1993). Exploring the meaning-making process through the content of literature response journals. Research in the Teaching of English, 27 (4), 335368.
10. Hancock, M.R. (2008). The status of reader response research: Sustaining the readers voice in challenging times. In S. Lehr (Ed.), Shattering the looking glass: Challenge, risk, and controversy in childrens literature (pp. 97116). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
11. International Reading Association. (2009). New literacies and 21stcentury technologies: A position statement of the International Reading Association. Newark, DE: Author.
12. Kucer, S.B. (2005). Dimensions of literacy: A conceptual base for teaching reading and writing in school settings (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Lankshear, C. (with Gee, J., Knobel, M., & Searle, C.) (1997). Changing literacies. Buckingham: Open University Press.
14. Larson, L.C. (2007). A case study exploring the "new literacies" during a fifth-grade electronic reading workshop. Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University. Retrieved February 19, 2010, from krex.k-state.edu/dspace/handle/2097/352
15. Larson, L.C. (2008). Electronic reading workshop: Beyond books with new literacies and instructional technologies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52 (2), 121131. doi:10.1598/JAAL.52.2.3
16. Larson, L.C. (2009). E-reading and e-responding: New tools for the next generation of readers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53 (3), 255258. doi:10.1598/JAAL.53.3.7
17. Leu, D.J. (2002). The new literacies: Research on reading instruction with the Internet. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 310336). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
18. Leu, D.J., Kinzer, C.K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D.W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R.B. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 15701613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
19. Matthew, K.I. (1996). The impact of CD-ROM storybooks on childrens reading comprehension and reading attitude. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5 (34), 379394.
20. Reinking, D. (1998). Synthesizing technological transformations of literacy in a post-typographical world. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. xixxx). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Rosenblatt, L.M. (1938). Literature as exploration. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
22. Rosenblatt, L.M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
23. Stake, R.E. (2000). Case studies. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Wollman-Bonilla, J.E., & Werchadlo, B. (1995). Literature response journals in a first-grade classroom. Language Arts, 72 (8), 562570.