Content validity of a process evaluation checklist to measure intervention implementation fidelity of the EPIC intervention

Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 158-164

  Yamada, Janet ^a   Stevens, Bonnie ^a   Sidani, Souraya ^b   Watt Watson, Judy ^a   De Silva, Nicole ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

content validity; evaluation; Evidence Based Practice Identification and Change (EPIC); fidelity; measure

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHECKLIST; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; EVIDENCE BASED NURSING; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

CHECKLIST; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS;

EID: 77956365241     PISSN: 1545102X     EISSN: 17416787     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2010.00182.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Armstrong T.S., Cohen M.Z., Eriksen L. & Cleeland C. (2005). Content validity of self-report measurement instruments: An illustration from the development of the Brain Tumor Module of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Oncology Nursing Forum, 32 (3 669 676.
2. Baranowski T. & Stables G. (2000). Process evaluations of the 5-a-day projects. Health Education & Behavior, 27 (2 157 166.
3. Bouffard J.A., Taxman F.S. & Silverman R. (2003). Improving process evaluations of correctional programs by using a comprehensive evaluation methodology. Evaluation and Program Planning, 26, 149 161.
4. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group (EPOC) 2002). The data collection checklist [Electronic Version] (1-26). Retrieved July 15, 2009, from http://www.epoc.cochrane.org/en/handsearchers.html.
5. Grant J.S. & Davis L.L. (1997). Focus on quantitative methods. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in Nursing & Health, 20 (3 269 274.
6. Hakkennes S. & Dodd K. (2008). Guideline implementation in allied health professions: A systematic review of the literature. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 17, 296 300.
7. Haynes S.N., Richard, D.C.S. & Kubany E.S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7 (3 238 247.
8. Hulscher M.E., Laurant M.G. & Grol R.P. (2003). Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 12 (1 40 46.
9. Jamtvedt G., Young J.M., Kristoffersen D.T., O'Brien M.A. & Oxman A.D. (2006). Audit and feedback: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 1, Art. No.: CD000259. DOI :.
10. Johnston C. (1998). Psychometric issues in measurement of pain. In A. Finley & P. McGrath (Eds. Measurement of pain in infants and children (pp. 5 20)
11. Kraag G., Van Breukelen G., Lamberts P., Vugts O., Kok G., Fekkes M. & Huijer Abu-Saad H. (2007). Process evaluation of 'learn young, learn fair:' A stress management programme for 5th and 6th graders. School of Psychology International, 28, 206 219.
12. Lee S.K., Aziz K., Singhal N., Cronin C.M., James A., Lee D.S.C., Matthew D., Ohlsson A., Sankaran K., Seshia M., Synnes A., Walker R., Whyte R., Langley J., MacNab Y.C., Stevens B. & von Dadelszen, P. (2009). Improving the quality of care for infants: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 181 (8 469 476.
13. Lynn M.R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35 (6 382 385.
14. Medical Research Council 2000). A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. Retrieved January 25, 2009, from http://www.mrc.ac.uk/consumption/idcplg?IdcService=GET- FILE&dID=9025&dDocName=MRC003372&allowInterrupt=1.
15. Oakley A., Strange V., Bonell C., Allen E. & Stephenson J. (2006). Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. British Medical Journal, 332 (7538 413 416.
16. Polit D.F. & Beck C.T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29 (5 489 497.
17. Polit D.F., Beck C.T. & Owen S.V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30 (4 459 467.
18. Rossi R.H., Lipsy M.W. & Freeman H.E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach 7th ed.).
19. Saunders R.P., Evans M.H. & Joshi P. (2005). Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: A how-to guide. Health Promotion Practice, 6 (2 134 147.
20. Schilling L.S., Dixon J.K., Knafl K.A., Grey M., Ives B. & Lynn M.R. (2007). Determining content validity of a self-report instrument for adolescents using a heterogeneous expert panel. Nursing Research, 56 (5 361 366.
21. Sidani S. & Braden C.J. (1998). Intervention variables. In S. Sidani & C.J. Braden (Eds. Evaluating nursing interventions: A theory-driven approach (pp. 105-137)
22. Stein K.F., Sargent J.T. & Rafaels N. (2007). Intervention research: Establishing fidelity of the independent variable in nursing clinical trials. Nursing Research, 56 (1 54 62.
23. Stevens B., Barwick M., Campbell F., Chambers C., Cohen J., Cummings G., Estabrooks C.A., Finley G.A., Johnston C., Kavanagh T., Latimer M., Lee S., LeMay S., McGrath P.J., Rashotte J., Rosmus C., Sawatzky-Dickson D., Scott S., Sidani S., Stinson J., Stremler R., Synnes A., Taddio A., Villeneuve E., Warnock F., Willan A. & Yamada J. (2006-2011). CIHR team in children's pain.
24. Streiner D.L. & Norman G.R. (2008). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use, 4th edn.