Qualitative bipolar decision rules: Toward more expressive settings

Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing

Volumn 257, Issue , 2010, Pages 139-158

  Dubois, Didier ^a   Fargier, Hélène ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956361751     PISSN: 14349922     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15976-3_9     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C., Livet, P.: On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. Int. J. of Intelligent Systems 23(10), 1062-1093 (2008)
2. Amgoud, L., Prade, H.: Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artificial Intelligence 173(3-4), 413-436 (2009)
3. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Bipolar possibility theory in preference modeling: Representation, fusion and optimal solutions. Information Fusion 7, 135-150 (2006)
4. Bilbao, J. M., Fernandez, J. R., Jiménez Losada, A., Lebrón, E.: Bicooperative games. In: Bilbao, J. M. (ed.) Cooperative games on combinatorial structures, pp. 23-26. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)
5. Bonnefon, J.-F., Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Prade, H.: On the qualitative comparison of decisions having positive and negative features. J. Artificial Intelligence Research 32, 385-417 (2008)
6. Bonnefon, J. F., Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Leblois, S.: Qualitative heuristics for balancing the pros and cons. Theory and Decision 65, 71-85 (2008)
7. Boutilier, C., Brafman, R. I., Domshlak, C., Hoos, H. H., Poole, D.: CP-nets: A tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. J. Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 21, 135-191 (2004)
8. Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G.: Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin 115, 401-423 (1994)
9. Chateauneuf, A.: Decomposable capacities, distorted probabilities and concave capacities. Mathematical Social Sciences 31(1), 19-37 (1996)
10. Deschamps, R., Gevers, L.: Leximin and utilitarian rules: a joint characterization. J. of Economic Theory 17, 143-163 (1978)
11. Doyle, J., Thomason, R.: Background to qualitative decision theory. The AI Magazine 20(2), 55-68 (1999)
12. Dubois, D.: Belief structures, possibility theory and decomposable confidence measures on finite sets. Computers and Artificial Intelligence 5(5), 403-416 (1986)
13. Dubois, D., Fargier, H.: On the qualitative comparison of sets of positive and negative affects. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 305-316. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
14. Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Prade, H., Sabbadin, R.: A survey of qualitative decision rules under uncertainty. In: Bouyssou, D., Dubois, D., Pirlot, M., Prade, H. (eds.) Decision-Making Process-Concepts and Methods, ch. 11, pp. 435-473. Wiley, Chichester (2009), http://www.wiley.com
15. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility Theory. Plenum Press, New York (1988)
16. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Bipolar representations in reasoning, knowledge extraction and decision processes. In: Greco, S., Hata, Y., Hirano, S., Inuiguchi, M., Miyamoto, S., Nguyen, H. S., Słowiński, R. (eds.) RSCTC 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4259, pp. 15-26. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
17. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: An introduction to bipolar representations of information and preference. Int. J. Intelligent Systems. 23(8), 866-877 (2008)
18. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Formal representations of uncertainty. In: Bouyssou, D., Dubois, D., Pirlot, M., Prade, H. (eds.) Decision-Making Process-Concepts and Methods, ch. 3, pp. 85-156. Wiley, Chichester (2009), http://www.wiley.com
19. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: An overview of the asymmetric bipolar representation of positive and negative information in possibility theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 160, 1355-1366 (2009)
20. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Sabbadin, R.: Decision-theoretic foundation of qualitative possibility theory. European J. of Operational Research 128, 478-495 (2001)
21. Fargier, H., Sabbadin, R.: Qualitative decision under uncertainty: Back to expected utility. Artificial Intelligence 164, 245-280 (2005)
22. Franklin, B.: Letter to J. B. Priestley, 1772. In: Bigelow, J. (ed.) The Complete Works. Putnam, New York (1887)
23. Giang, P. H., Shenoy, P. P.: Two axiomatic approaches to decision-making using possibility theory. European J. of Operational Research 162, 450-467 (2005)
24. Gigerenzer, G., Goldstein, D. G.: Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review 103, 650-669 (1996)
25. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., the ABC group: Simple heuristics thatmake us smart. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)
26. Grabisch, M.: The Moebius transform on symmetric ordered structures and its application to capacities on finite sets. Discrete Math 28(1-3), 17-34 (2004)
27. Grabisch, M., Greco, S., Pirlot, M.: Bipolar and bivariate models in multicriteria decision analysis: Descriptive and constructive approaches. Int. J. Intelligent Systems. 23(9), 930-969 (2008)
28. Grabisch, M., Labreuche, C.: Bi-capacities for decision making on bipolar scales. In: EUROFUSE 2002 Workshop on Information Systems, pp. 185-190 (2002)
29. Grabisch, M., Labreuche, C.: Bi-capacities - parts I and II. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 151(2), 211-260 (2005)
30. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R.: Bipolar Sugeno and Choquet integrals. In: EUROFUSEWorkshop on Information Systems, Varenna, pp. 191-196 (2002)
31. Labreuche, C., Grabisch, M.: Generalized Choquet-like aggregation functions for handling bipolar scales. Eur. J. of Operational Research 172(3), 931-955 (2006)
32. Lewis, D.: Counterfactuals. Basil Blackwell, London (1973)
33. Moulin, H.: Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making. Wiley, New-York (1988)
34. Von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1947)
35. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., Tannenbaum, P. H.: The Measurement of Meaning. Univ. of Illinois Press, Chicago (1957)
36. Öztürk, M., Tsoukiàs, A.: Bipolar preference modeling and aggregation in decision support. Int. J. Intelligent Systems. 23(9), 970-984 (2008)
37. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)
38. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., MacGregor, D. G.: Rational actors or rational fools? implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics. The J. of Socio-Economics 31, 329-342 (2002)
39. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 297-323 (1992)
40. Wald, A.: Statistical Decision Functions. Wiley, Chichester (1950)
41. Weng, P.: An axiomatic approach in qualitative decision theory with binary possibilistic utility. In: Proc. of the 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2006), Riva del Garda, Italy, pp. 467-471. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)
42. Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1, 1-28 (1978)