Bipolar representations in reasoning, knowledge extraction and decision processes

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4259 LNAI, Issue , 2006, Pages 15-26

  Dubois, Didier ^a   Prade, Henri ^a  

^a IRIT   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; DECISION THEORY; FORMAL LOGIC; INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

ARGUMENTATION; INFORMATION ENGINEERING; KNOWLEDGE EXTRACTION; LOGICAL REPRESENTATIONS;

KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33845268267     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11908029_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. L. Amgoud and H. Prade. Comparing decisions on the basis of a bipolar typology of arguments. In A. Hunter J. Dix, editor, Proc. 11th Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, pages 426-432, Windermere U.K., 2006.
2. M. Banerjee. Rough sets and 3-valued Lukasiewicz logic. Fundamenta Informaticae, 32:213-220, 1997.
3. N. D. Belnap. A useful four-valued logic. In J.M. Dunn and G. Epstein, editors, Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic, pages 8-37. D.Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1977.
4. S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, S. Kaci, and H. Prade. Bipolar possibility theory in preference modeling: Representation, fusion and optimal solutions. Information Fusion, 7:135-150, 2006.
5. S. Blarney. Partial logic. In D. Gabbay and F. Guentner, editors, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2d Ed., volume 5, pages 261-353. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998.
6. J. T. Cacioppo, W. L. Gardner, and G. G. Berntson. Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1:3- 25, 1997.
7. D. Dubois and H. Fargier. Qualitative decision making with bipolar information. In Proc. of Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning KR'06, Windermere, UK, pages 175-186, Menlo Park, Ca., 2006. AAAI Press.
8. D. Dubois, P. Hajek, and H. Prade. Knowledge-driven versus data-driven logics. J. of Logic, Language, and Information, 9:65-89, 2000.
9. D. Dubois, E. Huellermeier, and H. Prade. A systematic approach to the assessment of fuzzy association rules. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, to appear, 2006.
10. D. Dubois and H. Prade. Conditional objects as non-monotonic consequence relationships. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 24:1724-1739, 1994.
11. D. Dubois and H. Prade. Possibility theory, probability theory and multiple-valued logics: A clarification. Ann. Math. and Artificial Intelligence, 32:35-66, 2001.
12. D. Dubois, H. Prade, and P. Smets. "Not impossible" vs. "guaranteed possible" in fusion and revision. In S. Benferhat and Besnard P., editors, Proceedings of ECSQARU'01 - LNAI 2143, pages 522-531, 2001.
13. D. Dubois, H. Prade, and L. Ughetto. A new perspective on reasoning with fuzzy rules. Int. J. of Intelligent Systems, 18:541-567, 2003.
14. M. Grabisch. The Moebius transform on symmetric ordered structures and its application to capacities on finite sets. Discrete Math., 28(1-3):17-34, 2004.
15. M. Grabisch and Ch. Labreuche. Bi-capacities - parts I and II. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 151(2):211-260, 2005.
16. S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski. Bipolar Sugeno and Choquet integrals. In EUROFUSE Workshop on Information Systems, pages 191-196, Varenna, 2002.
17. S. Kraus, D. Lehmann, and M. Magidor. Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial Intelligence, 44(1-2):167-207, 1990.
18. Ch. Labreuche and M. Grabisch. Generalized Choquet-like aggregation functions for handling bipolar scales. Eur. J. of Operational Research, 172(3):931-955, 2006.
19. C. E. Osgood, G.J. Suci, and P. H. Tannenbaum. The Measurement of Meaning. Univ. of Illinois Press, Chicago, 1957.
20. Z. Pawlak. Rough Sets - Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1991.
21. H. Prade and M. Serrurier. Version space learning for possibilistic hypotheses. In Proc. of 17th Europ. Conf. on Art. Intel, ECAI'06, Riva del Garda, Italy, 2006.
22. P. Slovic, M. Finucane, E. Peters, and D.G. MacGregor. Rational actors or rational fools? implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 31:329-342, 2002.
23. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5:297-323, 1992.