Damping mechanisms and damping ratios in vibrating unreinforced stone masonry

Engineering Structures

Volumn 32, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 3269-3278

  Elmenshawi, Abdelsamie ^a   Sorour, Mohamed ^a   Mufti, Aftab ^b   Jaeger, Leslie G ^c   Shrive, Nigel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^c DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Coulomb friction; Free vibration; Stone masonry; Viscous damping

Indexed keywords

COULOMB FRICTIONS; DAMPING MECHANISMS; DAMPING RATIO; DYNAMIC BEHAVIOURS; DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS; EFFECTIVE DAMPING; FREE VIBRATION; FREE-VIBRATION TESTS; IN-PLANE; IN-PLANE DIRECTION; NATURAL PERIOD; OUT-OF-PLANE; STONE MASONRY; VISCOUS DAMPING; VISCOUS DAMPING RATIO; WALL VIBRATIONS;

FRICTION; MASONRY MATERIALS; TRIBOLOGY;

DAMPING;

DAMAGE; DAMPING; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; FRICTION; MASONRY; TESTING METHOD; VIBRATION;

EID: 77956344861     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.06.016     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Benedetti D., Carydis P., Pezzoli P. Shaking table tests on 24 simple masonry buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1998, 27:67-90.
2. Juhásová E., Sofronie R., Bairrão R. Stone masonry in historical buildings-ways to increase their resistance and durability. Eng Struct 2008, 30:2194-2205.
3. Mazzon N, Valluzzi M, Aoki T, Garbin E, De Canio G, Ranieri N. et al. Shaking table tests on two multi-leaf stone masonry buildings. In: Proceeding of 11th Canadian masonry symposium. 2009.
4. Meyer P., Ochsendorf J., Germaine J., Kausel E. The impact of high-frequency/low-energy seismic waves on unreinforced masonry. Earthq Spectra 2007, 23:77-94.
5. Tomaževič M. Earthquake-resistant design of masonry buildings 1999, Imperial College Press.
6. Tomaževič M. Damage as a measure for earthquake-resistant design of masonry structures: Slovenian experience. Can J Civ Eng, CJCE 2007, 34:1403-1412.
7. Chopra A. Dynamics of structures 2006, Prentice Hall.
8. Clough R., Penzien J. Dynamics of structures 2003, Computers & Structures, Inc.
9. Humar J. Dynamics of structures 1990, Prentice Hall.
10. Newmark N, Hall W. Earthquake spectra and design, engineering monographs on earthquake criteria, structural design, and strong motion. Berkeley (California): The Earthquake Engineering Research Institute; 1982.
11. Wakabayashi M. Design of earthquake-resistant buildings 1986, McGraw-Hill Book Company.
12. Elmenshawi A., Sorour M., Mufti A., Jaeger L., Shrive N. In-plane seismic behaviour of historic stone masonry. Can J Civ Eng, CJCE 2010, 37:465-476.
13. NBCC 2005. National Building Code of Canada. Canada: National Research Council; 2005.
14. Atkinson G., Beresnew I. Compatible ground-motion time histories for new national seismic hazard maps. Can J Civ Eng, CJCE 1998, 25:305-318.
15. Elmenshawi A, Sorour M, Parsekian G, Duchesne D, Paquette J, Mufti A. et al. Out-of-plane dynamic behaviour of unreinforced stone masonry. In: 8th international masonry conference. 2010, pp. 1643-1652.
16. Sorour M, Parsekian G, Duchesne D, Paquette J, Mufti A, Jaeger L. et al. Evaluation of young's modulus for stone masonry walls under compression. In: Proceedings, 11th Canadian masonry symposium. 2009. p. 121-30.
17. Sorour M, Parsekian G, Duchesne D, Paquette J, Mufti A, Jaeger L. et al. Static and dynamic testing of historic stone masonry walls. In: Prohitech conference, protection of historical buildings by reversible mixed technologies. 2009.
18. Sorour M, Parsekian G, Duchesne D, Paquette J, Mufti A, Jaeger L. et al. Experimental investigation of the mechanical properties of historic stone masonry walls. In: Proceeding of 8th international seminar on structural masonry. 2008. p. 449-57.
19. Beards C. Structural vibration-analysis and damping 1996, Arnold.
20. Iwan W. Drift spectrum: measure of demand for earthquake ground motions. J Struct Eng, ASCE 1997, 123:397-404.
21. Lam N., Griffith M., Wilson J., Doherty K. Time-history analysis of URM walls in out-of-plane flexure. Eng Struct 2003, 25:743-754.
22. Makris N., Konstantinidis D. The rocking spectrum and the limitations of practical design methodologies. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2003, 32:265-289.
23. Abrams D, Costley A. Dynamic response measurements for URM building systems. In: Proceedings of the US-Italy workshop on guidelines for seismic evaluation and rehabilitation of unreinforced masonry buildings. 1994.
24. Bothara J., Dhakal R., Mander J. Seismic performance of an unreinforced masonry building: an experimental investigation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2010, 39:45-68.
25. Wu Z., Liu H., Liu L., Yuan D. Identification of nonlinear viscous damping and Coulomb friction from free response data. J Sound Vibration 2007, 304:407-414.
26. Lin Y., Miranda E., Chang K. Evaluation of damping reduction factors for estimating elastic response of structures with high damping. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2005, 34:1427-1443.
27. Bandstra J. Comparison of equivalent viscous damping and nonlinear damping in discrete and continuous vibrating systems. J Vib Acoust Stress Reliab Des 1983, 105:382-392.
28. ATC 40. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Report No. SSC 96-01. Redwood (California): Applied Technology Council; 1996.
29. FEMA 273. NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington (DC): Building Seismic Safety Council; 1997.
30. Elmenshawi A., Brown T. Hysteretic energy and damping capacity of flexural elements constructed with different concrete strengths. Eng Struct 2010, 32:297-305.