Compatible ground-motion time histories for new national seismic hazard maps

Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 305-318

  Atkinson, Gail M ^a   Beresnev, Igor A ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Compatible time histories; Ground motions; Seismic hazard

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HISTORY; MAPS; SEISMOLOGY; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS;

EID: 0032043533     PISSN: 03151468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/l97-094     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adams, J., Weichert, D., Halchuk, S., and Basham, P. 1996. Trial seismic hazard maps of Canada - 1995: final values for selected Canadian cities. Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ont., Open File 3283.
2. Atkinson, G. 1990. Updated seismic hazard estimates at Ontario Hydro sites. Report, Ontario Hydro, Toronto, Ont.
3. Atkinson, G. 1991. Use of the uniform hazard spectrum in characterizing expected levels of seismic ground shaking. Proceedings of the 6th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Toronto, Ont., pp. 469-476.
4. Atkinson, G. 1993. Notes on ground motion parameters for eastern North America: duration and H/V ratio. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 83: 587-596.
5. Atkinson, G. 1995a. Attenuation and source parameters of earthquakes in the Cascadia region. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85: 1327-1342.
6. Atkinson, G. 1995b. The high-frequency shape of the source spec- trum for earthquakes in eastern and western Canada. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85: 106-112.
7. Atkinson, G. 1997. Empirical ground motion realtions for earthquakes in the Cascadia region. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 24: 64-77.
8. Atkinson, G., and Boore, D. 1995. New ground motion relations for eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85: 17-30.
9. Atkinson, G., and Boore, D. 1997a. Stochastic point-source modeling of ground motions in the Cascadia region. Seismological Research Letters, 68: 74-85.
10. Atkinson, G., and Boore, D. 1997b. Some comparisons between recent ground motion relations. Seismological Research Letters, 68: 24-40.
11. Atwater, B., Nelson, A., Clague, J., Carver, G., Yamaguchi, D., Bobrowsky, P., Bourgeois, J., Darienzo, P., Grant, W., Hemphill-Haley, E., Kelsey, H., Jocoby, G., Nishenko, S., Palmer, S., Peterson, C., and Reinhart, M. 1995. Summary of coastal geologic evidence for past great earthquakes at the Cascadia subduction zone. Earthquake Spectra, 11: 1-18.
12. n spectrum. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 87: 67-84.
13. Beresnev, I., and Wen, K. 1997. Nonlinear ground response - a reality? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86: 1964-1978.
14. Boore, D. 1983. Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on Seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 73: 1865-1894.
15. Boore, D., Joyner, W., and Fumal, T. 1993. Estimation of response spectra and peak accelerations from western North American earthquakes: an interim report. U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report 93-509.
16. Castro, R., Mucciarelli, M., Pacor, F., and Petrungaro, C. 1997. S-wave site-response estimates using horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 87: 256-260.
17. Cohee, B., Somerville, P., and Abrahamson, N. 1991. Simulated ground motions for hypothesized Mw = 8 subduction earthquakes in Washington and Oregon. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 81: 28-56.
18. Cornell, C. 1968. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 58: 1583-1606.
19. Crouse, C. 1991. Ground-motion attenuation equations for Cascadia subduction zone earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, 7: 201-236.
20. Dewberry, S., and Crosson, R. 1995. Source scaling and moment estimation for the Pacific Northwest Seismograph Network using S-coda amplitudes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85: 1309-1326.
21. EERI Committee on Seismic Risk. 1989. The basics of seismic risk analysis. Earthquake Spectra, 5: 675-702.
22. EPRI. 1986. Seismic hazard methodology for the central and eastern United States. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif., Report NP-4726.
23. Greig, G., and Atkinson, G. 1993. The damage potential of eastern North American earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters, 64: 119-137.
24. Hanks, T., and McGuire, R. 1981. The character of high-frequency strong ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 71: 2071-2095.
25. Hartzell, S. 1978. Earthquake aftershocks as Green's functions. Geophysics Research Letters, 5: 1-14.
26. Heaton, T., and Hartzell, S. 1989. Estimation of strong ground motions for hypothetical earthquakes on the Cascadia subduction zone, Pacific Northwest. Pure Applied Geophysics, 129: 131-201.
27. Heidebrecht, A.C., Naumoski, N., and Rutenberg, A. 1994. Towards a new base shear format in future NBCC seismic provisions. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 21: 682-695.
28. Hyndman, R., and Wang, K. 1995. The rupture zone of Cascadia great earthquake from current deformation and the thermal regime. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100(B11): 22 133 - 22 154.
29. Kanamori, H. 1979. A semi-empirical approach to prediction of long- period motions from great earthquakes, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 69: 1645-1670.
30. Kanamori, H., and Anderson, D. 1975. Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 65: 1073-1095.
31. Martin, G., and Dobry, R. 1994. Earthquake site response and seismic code provisions. National Center for Earthquake Engineering, Buffalo, N.Y., Quarterly Bulletin, 8(4): 1-6.
32. McGuire, R. 1977. Seismic design spectra and mapping procedures using hazard analysis based directly on oscillator response. International Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 5: 211-234.
33. McGuire, R. 1995. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85: 1275-1284.
34. NEHRP. 1994. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings. Part 1 : provisions. Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, D.C.
35. Reiter, L. 1990. Earthquake hazard analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
36. Silva, W., Darragh, R., and Wong, I. 1990. Engineering characterization of earthquake strong ground motions with applications to the Pacific Northwest. In Proceedings of the Third NEHRP Workshop on Earthquake Hazards in the Puget Sound/Portland Region. Edited by W. Hays. U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report.
37. Theodulidis, N., Bard, P., Archuleta, R., and Bouchon, M. 1996. Horizontal-to vertical spectral ratio and geological conditions: the case of Garner Valley downhose array in southern California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86: 306-319.
38. Toro, G., and McGuire, R. 1987. Calculational procedures for seismic hazard analysis and its uncertainty in the eastern United States. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Princeton, NJ., pp. 195-206.
39. Turkstra, C., and Tallin, A. 1988. A re-evaluation of design spectra for seismic damage control. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York, Buffalo, N.Y., Report NCEER-88-0032.
40. Youngs, R., Day, S., and Stevens, J. 1988. Near field ground motions on rock for large subduction earthquakes. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Geotechnical Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Park City, Utah, June 27-30, pp. 445-462.