Predicting the onset of glaucoma: The confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ancillary study to the ocular hypertension treatment study

Ophthalmology

Volumn 117, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1674-1683

  Weinreb, Robert N ^a   Zangwill, Linda M ^a   Jain, Sonia ^a   Becerra, Lida M ^a   Dirkes, Keri ^a   Piltz Seymour, Jody R ^b   Cioffi, George A ^c   Trick, Gary L ^d   Coleman, Anne L ^e   Brandt, James D ^f   Liebmann, Jefferey M ^g   Gordon, Mae O ^h   Kass, Michael A ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^e JULES STEIN EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g NEW YORK EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

^h WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HAZARD RATIO; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC DISK; PREDICTION; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RANDOMIZATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; STEREOMETRY; TOPOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELD;

FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LASERS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PHOTOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROBABILITY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77956338897     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.044     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. L.M. Zangwill, R.N. Weinreb, J.A. Beiser Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Ancillary Study to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group Baseline topographic optic disc measurements are associated with the development of primary open-angle glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol 123 2005 1188 1197
2. L.M. Alencar, C. Bowd, and R.N. Weinreb Comparison of HRT-3 glaucoma probability score and subjective stereophotograph assessment for prediction of progression in glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49 2008 1898 1906
3. M.O. Gordon, M.A. Kass Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: design and baseline description of the participants Arch Ophthalmol 117 1999 573 583
4. L.M. Zangwill, R.N. Weinreb, C.C. Berry OHTS CSLO Ancillary Study Group The Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Ancillary Study to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: study design and baseline factors Am J Ophthalmol 137 2004 219 227
5. L.M. Zangwill, R.N. Weinreb, C.C. Berry Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Ancillary Study to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Racial differences in optic disc topography: baseline results from the Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Ancillary Study to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Arch Ophthalmol 122 2004 22 28
6. G. Wollstein, D.F. Garway-Heath, and R.A. Hitchings Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope Ophthalmology 105 1998 1557 1563
7. N.M. Swindale, G. Stjepanovic, A. Chin, and F.S. Mikelberg Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 2000 1730 1742
8. M.E. Tipping Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine J Mach Learn Res 1 2001 211 244
9. E.W. Lee, L.J. Wei, and D.A. Amato Cox-type regression analysis for large numbers of small groups of correlated failure time observations J.P. Klein, P.K. Goel, Survival Analysis: State of the Art 1992 Kluwer Dordrecht, Netherlands 237 247 NATO ASI series, series E: Applied sciences. No. 211
10. Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group, European Glaucoma Prevention Study Group Validated prediction model for the development of primary open-angle glaucoma in individuals with ocular hypertension Ophthalmology 114 2007 10 19
11. N. Harizman, J.R. Zelefsky, and E. Ilitchev Detection of glaucoma using operator-dependent versus operator-independent classification in the Heidelberg retinal tomograph-III Br J Ophthalmol 90 2006 1390 1392
12. R. Jaeschke, G.H. Guyatt, D.L. Sackett Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group Users' guides to the medical literature. III: How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B: what are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA 271 1994 703 707
13. D.L. Simel, G.P. Samsa, and D.B. Matchar Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies J Clin Epidemiol 44 1991 763 770
14. F.E. Harrell Jr Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression and Survival Analysis 2001 Springer New York 493
15. A. Ferreras, A.B. Pajarin, and V. Polo Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis Ophthalmology 114 2007 1981 1987
16. F.A. Medeiros, L.M. Zangwill, and C. Bowd Agreement between stereophotographic and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy measurements of cup/disc ratio: effect on a predictive model for glaucoma development J Glaucoma 16 2007 209 214
17. F. Oddone, M. Centofanti, and L. Rossetti Exploring the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 diagnostic accuracy across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study Ophthalmology 115 2008 1358 1365
18. A. Coops, D.B. Henson, A.J. Kwartz, and P.H. Artes Automated analysis of Heidelberg retinal tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 2006 5348 5355