A pilot study to detect glaucoma with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy compared with nonmydriatic stereoscopic photography in a community health screening

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 531-538

  Ohkubo, Shinji ^a   Takeda, Hisashi ^a   Higashide, Tomomi ^a   Sasaki, Tsugihisa ^a   Sugiyama, Kazuhisa ^a  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II; Nonmydriatic stereoscopic photography; Public glaucoma screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; GONIOSCOPY; HEIDELBERG RETINA TOMOGRAPH II; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASS SCREENING; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; OPTIC NERVE; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; SLIT LAMP; STEREOSCOPIC PHOTOGRAPHY; STEREOSCOPIC VISION;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; GONIOSCOPY; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LASERS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PHOTOGRAPHY; PILOT PROJECTS; PREVALENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 34548700822     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31804a5e97     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Quigley HA, Vitale S. Models of open-angle glaucoma prevalence and incidence in the United States. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:83-91.
2. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma and intraocular pressure distribution in a defined population. The Egna-Neumarkt Study. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:209-215.
3. Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1641-1648.
4. Greaney MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, et al. Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:140-145.
5. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557-1563.
6. Sanchez-Galeana C, Bowd C, Blumenthal EZ, et al. Using optical imaging summary data to detect glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1812-1818.
7. Weinreb RN, Bowd C, Zangwill LM. Glaucoma detection using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal polarization compensation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:218-224.
8. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry. St Louis: Mosby; 1999:152-153.
9. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, et al. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:238-242.
10. Yamada N, Chen PP, Mills RP, et al. Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1479-1484.
11. Iwasaki A, Sugita M. Performance of glaucoma mass screening with only a visual field test using frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:529-537.
12. Harasymowycz PJ, Papamatheakis DG, Fansi AK, et al. Validity of screening for glaucomatous optic nerve damage using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II) in high-risk populations: a pilot study. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:2164-2171.
13. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Singh K, et al. A population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: the Baltimore Eye Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134:1102-1110.
14. Detry-Morel M, Zeyen T, Kestelyn P, et al. Screening for glaucoma in a general population with the non-mydriatic fundus camera and the frequency doubling perimeter. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2004;14:387-393.
15. Ford BA, Artes PH, McCormick TA, et al. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1145-1150.
16. Vitale S, Smith SD, Quigley H, et al. Screening performance of functional and structural measurements of neural damage in open-angle glaucoma: a case-control study from the Baltimore Eye Survey. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:346-356.
17. Shiose Y, Kitazawa Y, Tsukahara S, et al. Epidemiology of glaucoma in Japan. A nationwide glaucoma survey. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1991;35:133-135.
18. Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, et al. Prevalence of open angle glaucoma in Australia: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1661-1669.
19. Varma R, Steinmann WC, Scott IU. Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:215-221.
20. Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Quigg JM, et al. Confirmation of visual field abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1187-1194.
21. Watkins RJ, Broadway DC. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability indices for drawing scanning laser ophthalmoscope optic disc contour lines with and without the aid of optic disc photographs. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:351-357.