Quantitative and qualitative investigation into the impact of focused ultrasound with microbubbles on the triggered release of nanoparticles from vasculature in mouse tumors

Journal of Controlled Release

Volumn 146, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 291-298

  Lin, Chung Yin ^a,b   Liu, Tzu Ming ^a   Chen, Chao Yu ^a   Huang, Yen Lin ^c   Huang, Wei Kai ^a   Sun, Chi Kuang ^a   Chang, Fu Hsiung ^a   Lin, Win Li ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (Taiwan)

^c CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Focused ultrasound; Lipid coated quantum dots; Microbubbles; Nanoparticle delivery; Tumor

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC PRESSURES; BALB/C MICE; BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS; DIFFERENT SIZES; FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; GRAPHITE FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY; HARMONIC GENERATION MICROSCOPY; IMMUNOBLOTTING ANALYSIS; MICRO-BUBBLE; MICROBUBBLES; MOUSE TUMORS; QUANTUM DOT; RUPTURE AREAS; TARGETED DELIVERY; TRIGGERED RELEASE; TUMOR TISSUES; ULTRASOUND CONTRAST AGENT; VASCULAR PERMEABILITY; VASCULATURE;

ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY; BIOCHEMISTRY; BLOOD VESSELS; CADMIUM COMPOUNDS; HISTOLOGY; NANOPARTICLES; OPTICAL WAVEGUIDES; SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS; ULTRASONIC TRANSMISSION; ULTRASONICS;

TUMORS;

CADMIUM SELENIDE; DIOLEOYLPHOSPHATIDYLETHANOLAMINE; LIPID; LIPID COATED CADMIUM SELENIDE QUANTUM DOT; MACROGOL 2000; NANOPARTICLE; QUANTUM DOT; SONOVUE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BAGG ALBINO MOUSE; CANCER CELL CULTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG RELEASE; MALE; MICROBUBBLE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TUMOR VASCULARIZATION; ULTRASOUND;

ANIMALS; BLOOD VESSELS; CADMIUM COMPOUNDS; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; LIPIDS; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; MICROBUBBLES; NANOPARTICLES; NEOPLASMS; P-SELECTIN; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; QUANTUM DOTS; SELENIUM COMPOUNDS; SONICATION; SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 77956285915     PISSN: 01683659     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.05.033     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bergers G., Benjamin L.E. Tumorgenesis and the angiogenic switch. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3(6):401-410.
2. Jain R.K. 1995 Whitaker lecture: delivery of molecules, particles, and cells to solid tumors. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1996, 24(4):457-473.
3. Boucher Y., Baxter L.T., Jain R.K. Interstitial pressure gradients in tissue-isolated and subcutaneous tumors: implications for therapy. Cancer Res. 1990, 50(15):4478-4484.
4. Rapoport N., Pitt W.G., Sun H., Nelson J.L. Drug delivery in polymeric micelles: from in vitro to in vivo. J. Control. Release 2003, 91(1):85-95.
5. Peng C.L., Lai P.S., Lin F.H., Wu Y.H., Shieh M.J. Dual chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy in an HT-29 human colon cancer xenograft model using SN-38-loaded chlorine-core block copolymer micelles. Biomaterials 2009, 30(21):3614-3625.
6. Leunig M., Goetz A.E., Delliam M., Zetterer G., Gamarra F., Jain R.K., Messmer K. Interstitial fluid pressure in solid tumors following hyperthermia: possible correlation with therapeutic response. Cancer Res. 1992, 52(2):487-490.
7. Kong G., Braun R.D., Dewhirst M.W. Hyperthermia enables tumor-specific nanoparticle delivery: effect of particle size. Cancer Res. 2000, 60(12):4440-4445.
8. Dreher M.R., Liu W., Michelich C.R., Dewhirst M.W., Chilkoti A. Thermal cycling enhances the accumulation of a temperature-sensitive biopolymer in solid tumors. Cancer Res. 2007, 67(9):4418-4424.
9. Schlicher R.K., Radhakrishna H., Tolentino T.P., Apkarian R.P., Zarnitsyn V., Prausnitz M.R. Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2006, 32(6):915-924.
10. Husseini G.A., Pitt W.G. The use of ultrasound and micelles in cancer treatment. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2008, 8(5):2205-2215.
11. Price R.J., Skyba D.M., Kaul S., Skalak T.C. Delivery of colloidal particles and read blood cells to tissue through microvessel ruptures created by targeted microbubble destruction with ultrasound. Circulation 1998, 98(13):1264-1267.
12. Rapoport N.Y., Kennedy A.M., Shea J.E., Scaife C.L., Nam K.H. Controlled and targeted tumor chemotherapy by ultrasound-activated nanoemulsions/microbubbles. J. Control. Release 2009, 138(3):268-276.
13. 3. Circulation 2003, 108(3):336-341.
14. Netti P.A., Baxter L.T., Boucher Y., Skalak R., Jain R.K. Time-dependent behaviour of interstitial fluid pressure in solid tumors: implications for drug delivery. Cancer Res. 1995, 55(22):5451-5458.
15. Salnikov A.V., Inversen V.V., Koisti M., Sundberg C., Johansson L., Stuhr L.B., Sjoquist M., Ahlstrom H., Reed R.K., Rubin K. Lowering of tumor interstitial fluid pressure specifically augments efficacy of chemotherapy. FASEB J. 2003, 17(12):1756-1758.
16. Shieh M.J., Peng C.L., Lou P.J., Chiu C.H., Tsai T.Y., Hsu C.Y., Yeh C.Y., Lai P.S. Non-toxic phototriggered gene transfection by PAMAM-porphyrin conjugates. J. Control. Release 2008, 129(3):200-206.
17. Wolinsky J.B., Grinstaff M.W. Therapeutic and diagnostic applications of dendrimers for cancer treatment. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60(9):1037-1055.
18. Mikhail A.S., Allen C. Block copolymer micelles for delivery of cancer therapy: transport at the whole body, tissue and cellular levels. J. Control. Release 2009, 138(3):214-223.
19. Dreher M.R., Liu W., Michelich C.R., Dewhirst M.W., Yuan F., Chikoti A. Tumor vascular permeability, accumulation, and penetration of macromolecular drug carriers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2006, 98(5):335-344.
20. Liu Y., Miyoshi H., Nakamura M. Nanomedicine for drug delivery and imaging: a promising avenue for cancer therapy and diagnosis using targeted functional nanoparticles. Int. J. Cancer 2007, 120:2527-2537.
21. Jain R., Dandekar P., Patravale V. Diagnostic nanocarriers for sentinel lymph node imaging. J. Control. Release 2009, 138(2):90-102.
22. Schroeder J.E., Shweky I., Shmeeda H., Banin U., Gabizon A. Folate-mediated tumor cell uptake of quantum dots entrapped in lipid nanoparticles. J. Control. Release 2007, 124(1-2):28-34.
23. Rhyner M.N., Smith A.M., Gao X., Mao H., Yang L., Nie S. Quantum dots and multifunctional nanoparticles: new contrast agents for tumor imaging. Nanomedicine 2006, 1(2):209-217.
24. Bothun G.D., Rabideau A.E., Stoner M.A. Hepatoma cell uptake of cationic multifluorescent quantum dot liposomes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113(22):7725-7728.
25. Larson D.R., Zipfel W.R., Williams R.M., Clark S.W., Bruchez M.P., Wise F.W., Webb W.W. Water-soluble quantum dots for multiphoton fluorescence imaging in vivo. Science 2003, 300(5624):1434-1436.
26. Duertret B., Skourides P., Norris D.J., Noireaux V., Brivanlou A.H., Libchaber A. In vivo imaging of quantum dots encapsulated in phospholipid micelles. Science 2002, 298(5599):1759-1762.
27. Zhang H., Yee D., Wang C. Quantum dots for cancer diagnosis and therapy: biological and clinical perspectives. Nanomedicine 2008, 3(1):83-91.
28. Chang C.F., Chen C.Y., Chang F.H., Tai S.P., Chen C.Y., Yu C.H., Tseng Y.B., Liu I.S., Su W.F., Sun C.K. Quantum dots for cancer diagnosis and therapy: biological and clinical perspectives. Opt. Express 2008, 16(13):9534-9548.
29. Majetich S.A., Carter A.C. Surface effects on the optical-properties of cadmium selenide quantum dots. J. Phy. Chem. 1993, 97(34):8727-8737.
30. Carion O., Mahler B., Pons T., Dubertret B. Synthesis, encapsulation, purification and coupling of single quantum dots in phospholipid micelles for their use in cellular and in vivo imaging. Nat. Protocols 2007, 2(10):2383-2390.
31. Liu T.M., Lee Y.W., Chang C.F., Yeh S.C., Wang C.H., Chu S.W., Sun C.K. Imaging polyhedral inclusion bodies of nuclear polyhedrosis viruses with second harmonic generation microscopy. Opt. Express 2008, 16(8):5602-5608.
32. Bradford M.M. A rapid and sensitive methods for quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle for protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 7(72):248-254.
33. Rychak J.J., Lindner J.R., Ley K., Klibanov A.L. Deformable gas-filled microbubbles targeted to P-selectin. J. Control. Release 2006, 114(3):288-299.
34. Rychak J.J., Klibanov A.L., Hossack J.A. Acoustic radiation force enhances targeted delivery of ultrasound contrast microbubbles: in vitro verification. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2005, 52(3):421-433.
35. Hartwell D.W., Butterfield C.E., Frenette P.S., Kenyon B.M., Hynes R.O., Folkman J., Wagner D.D. Angiogenesis in P- and E-selectin-deficient mice. Microcirculation 1998, 5:173-178.
36. Hanahan D., Folkman J. Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell 1996, 86:353-364.
37. Bekeredjian R., Kroll R.D., Fein E., Tinkov S., Coester C., Winter G., Katus H.A., Kulaksiz H. Ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction increases capillary permeability in hepatomas. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2007, 33(10):1592-1598.
38. Fisher N.G., Christiansen J.P., Klibanov A., Taylor R.P., Kaul S., Lindner J.R. Influence of microbubble surface charge on capillary transit and myocardial contrast enhancement. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 26:1340-1347.