Response surface analysis of effects of hydraulic retention time and influent feed concentration on performance of an UASFF bioreactor

Waste Management

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1798-1807

  Zinatizadeh, A A L ^a   Pirsaheb, M ^b   Bonakdari, H ^a   Younesi, H ^c  

^a RAZI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b KERMANSHAH UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC SLUDGE; COD REMOVAL EFFICIENCY; COD REMOVAL RATE; FACTORIAL DESIGN; FEED CONCENTRATION; FIXED FILM; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; INTERACTIVE EFFECT; KINETIC EQUATIONS; METHANE PRODUCTION; MICROBIAL GROWTH RATE; ORGANIC LOADING RATES; PALM OIL MILL EFFLUENTS; PROCESS PARAMETERS; QUADRATIC MODELS; RESPONSE SURFACE ANALYSIS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SLUDGE RETENTION; SOLID RETENTION TIME; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS;

ALKALINITY; BIOCONVERSION; BIOGAS; BIOREACTORS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFLUENTS; FATTY ACIDS; HYDRAULICS; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; METHANE; OXYGEN; REMOVAL; SURFACE ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; VEGETABLE OILS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

BIOGAS; CARBON DIOXIDE; METHANE; PALM OIL; VOLATILE FATTY ACID;

ALKALINITY; BIOREACTOR; CARBON DIOXIDE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); EFFLUENT; FATTY ACID; RESIDENCE TIME; RESPONSE ANALYSIS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFLUENT; ENERGY RESOURCE; GROWTH RATE; MICROBIAL GROWTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UP FLOW ANAEROBIC SLUDGE FIXED FILM BIOREACTOR; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

BACTERIA, ANAEROBIC; BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ANALYSIS; BIOREACTORS; FATTY ACIDS, VOLATILE; KINETICS; METHANE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT OILS; REFUSE DISPOSAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77956269097     PISSN: 0956053X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ahmad A.L., Ismail S., Bhatia S. Optimization of coagulation-flocculation process for palm oil mill effluent using response surface methodology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39(8):2828-2834.
2. American Public Health Association (APHA) 1999. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. Washington, DC.
3. Baş D., Boyaci İ.H. Modeling and optimization I{cyrillic, ukrainian}: usability of response surface methodology. J. Food Eng. 2007, 78(5):836-845.
4. Borja R., Banks C.J. Kinetic of methane production from palm oil mill effluent in an immobilized cell bioreactor using saponite as support medium. Bioresour. Technol. 1994, 48:209-214.
5. Borja R., Banks C.J. Anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent using an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Biomass Bioenergy 1994, 6:381-389.
6. Borja R., Banks C.J., Khalfaoui B., Martin A. Performance evaluation of an anaerobic hybrid digester treating palm oil mill effluent. J. Environ. Sci. Health 1996, A31(6):1379-1393.
7. Box G.E.P., Draper N.R. Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces 1987, Wiley, New York.
8. Chapra S.C., Canale R.P. Numerical Methods for Engineers 2003, McGraw-Hill, New York. fourth ed.
9. Draper N.R., Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis 1998, Wiley, New York. third ed.
10. Droste R.L. Theory and Practice of Water and Wastewater Treatment 1997, Wiley, New York.
11. Duff S.J.B., Kennedy K.J. Effect of hydraulic and organic overloading on thermophilic downflow stationary fixed film (DSFF) reactor. Biotechnol. Lett. 1982, 4:815-820.
12. Faisal M., Unno H. Kinetic analysis of palm oil mill wastewater treatment by a modified anaerobic baffled reactor. Biochem. Eng. J. 2001, 9:25-31.
13. Fannin K.F. Start-up, operation, stability and control. Anaerobic Digestion of Biomass 1987, 179-195. Elsevier, London, UK. D.P. Chynoweth, R. Isaacson (Eds.).
14. Fakhrul-Razi A., Noor M.J.M.M. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) with the membrane anaerobic system (MAS). Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 39:159-163.
15. Jans T.J.M., Man D.G. Reactor Design Considerations and Experiences with Various Wastewaters. Published in a Book Entitle: Anaerobic Treatment of Industrial Wastewater 1988, Noyes Data Corporation.
16. Khuri A.I., Cornell J.A. Response Surfaces: Design and Analyses 1996, Marcel Dekker, New York. second ed.
17. Kuehl R.O. Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis 2000, Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA, (pp. 2-225). second ed.
18. Lawrence A.L., McCarty P.L. Kinetics of methane fermentation in anaerobic treatment. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1969, 41:R1-R17.
19. Lettinga G. Anaerobic digestion and wastewater treatment systems. Antonie van Leeuwen hoek. Int. J. Gen. Mol. Biol. 1995, 67:3-28.
20. Ma A.N., Ong A.S.H. Treatment of palm oil sterilizer condensate by an anaerobic process. Biological Waste 1988, 23:85-97.
21. Mason R.L., Gunst R.F., Hess J.L. Statistical design and analysis of experiments, eighth applications to engineering and science 2003, Wiley, New York. second ed.
22. Metcalf L., Eddy H. Wastewater engineering, treatment, disposal and reuse 2003, McGraw Hill, New York. fourth ed.
23. Najafpour G.D., Yieng H.A., Younesi H., Zinatizadeh A.A.L. Effect of organic loading on performance of rotating biological contactors using palm oil mill effluents. Process Biochem. 2005, 40:2879-2884.
24. Najafpour G.D., Zinatizadeh A.A.L., Mohamed A.R., Isa M.H., Nasrollahzadeh H. High-rate anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent in an up-flow sludge-fixed film bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2006, 41:370-379.
25. Norulaini N., Zuhairi A.A., Hakimi M.I., Omar M.A.K. Treatment of palm oil milleffluent (POME) using attached-film bioreactor: trickling filter as a case study. J. Ind. Technol. 2001, 10(1):41-54.
26. Sanchez E., Borja R., Travieso L., Martin A., Colmenarejo M.F. Effect of organic loading rate on the stability, operational parameters and performance of a secondary upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor treating piggery waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96:335-344.
27. Speece R.E. Advances in Anaerobic Biotechnology for Industrial Wastewater Treatment. Published in A Book Entitle: Anaerobic Treatment of Industrial Wastewater 1988, Noyes Data Corporation.
28. Sotemann S.W., Ristow N.E., Wentzel M.C., Ekama G.A. A steady state model for anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Water SA 2005, 31(4):511-527.
29. Trnoyec W., Britz T.J. Influence of organic loading rate and hydraulic retention time on the efficiency of a UASB bioreactor treating a canning factory effluent. Water SA 1998, 24(2):1147-1151.
30. Wise D.L. Bioenvironmental Systems 1987, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, (Chapter 6, pp. 135-159).
31. Zinatizadeh A.A.L., Mohamed A.R., Najafpour G.D., Isa M.H., Nasrollahzadeh H. Kinetic evaluation of high rate POME digestion in an UASFF bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2006, 41:1038-1046.
32. Zinatizadeh A.A.L., Mohamed A.R., Abdullah A.Z., Mashitah M.D., Isa M.H., Najafpour G.D. Process modeling and analysis of palm oil mill effluent treatment in an up-flow anaerobic sludge fixed film bioreactor using response surface methodology (RSM). Water Res. 2006, 40(17):3193-3208.
33. Zinatizadeh A.A.L., Younesi H., Bonakdari H., Pirsaheb M., Pazouki M., Najafpour G.D., Hasnain Isa M. Effects of process factors on biological activity of granular sludge grown in an UASFF bioreactor. Renewable Energy 2009, 34:1245-1251.
34. Zinatizadeh A.A.L., Mohamed A.R., Abdullah A.Z., Mashitah M.D., Isa M.H. Characteristics of granular sludge developed in an up-flow anaerobic sludge fixed film bioreactor treating palm oil mill effluent. Water Environ. Res. 2007, 79(8):833-844.