Effects of process factors on biological activity of granular sludge grown in an UASFF bioreactor

Renewable Energy

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1245-1251

  Zinatizadeh, A A L ^a   Younesi, H ^b   Bonakdari, H ^a   Pirsaheb, M ^c   Pazouki, M ^d   Najafpour, G D ^e   Hasnain Isa, M ^f  

^a RAZI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c KERMANSHAH UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^d MATERIALS AND ENERGY RESEARCH CENTER   (Iran)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MAZANDARAN   (Iran)

^f DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Biological activity; Biomass concentration; Granular sludge; UASFF bioreactor

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BIOACTIVITY; BIOGAS; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOMASS; BIOREACTORS; GRANULAR MATERIALS; GRANULATION; INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS; PH; PH EFFECTS; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; SHAPE MEMORY EFFECT; SPECTRUM ANALYZERS;

BIOGAS PRODUCTION; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; BIOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR; BIOMASS CONCENTRATION; CENTRAL COMPOSITE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) REMOVAL; COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS; DIGESTION PROCESS; GRANULAR SLUDGE; PROCESS CONDITIONS; PROCESS FACTORS; PROCESS VARIABLES; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY (RSA); SLUDGE REACTORS; UASFF BIOREACTOR;

SLUDGE DIGESTION;

ALKALINITY; BICARBONATE; BIOACTIVITY; BIOGAS; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; CALCIUM CARBONATE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GAS PRODUCTION; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; SLUDGE;

EID: 58649083454     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2008.10.013     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ahmad A.L., Ismail S., and Bhatia S. Water recycling from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using membrane technology. Desalination 157 (2003) 87-95
2. Sukami J, Ma AN, Darus A. Pollution abatement in the oil palm industry; the Malaysian experience. In: International Conference on Environmental Pollution. Budapest; 1996.
3. Droste R.L. Theory and practice of water and wastewater treatment (1997), John Wiley & Sons, New York
4. Björnsson L., Mattiasson B., and Henrysson T. Effects of support material on the pattern of volatile fatty acid accumulation at overload in anaerobic of semi-solid waste. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 47 (1997) 640-644
5. Lettinga G. Anaerobic digestion and wastewater treatment systems. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 67 (1995) 3-28
6. Anderson G.K., Kasipgil B., and Ince O. Comparison of porous and non-porous media in upflow anaerobic filters when treating dairy wastewater. Water Res 28 (1994) 1619-1624
7. Metcalf L., and Eddy H. Wastewater engineering. 4th ed. (2003), McGraw Hill, New York p. 800-1200
8. Rittmann B.E., and Mac Carty P.L. Environmental biotechnology: principles and applications (2001), McGraw-Hill, New York p. 569-636
9. Speece R.E. Anaerobic biotechnology for industrial wastewaters (1996), Archaea Press, Tennessee p. 95-120
10. Najafpour G.D., Zinatizadeh A.A.L., Mohamed A.R., Isa M.H., and Nasrollahzadeh H. High-rate anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent in an up-flow sludge-fixed film bioreactor. Process Biochem 41 (2006) 370-379
11. Najafpour G.D., Yieng H.A., Younesi H., and Zinatizadeh A.A.L. Effect of organic loading on performance of rotating biological contactors using palm oil mill effluents. Process Biochem 40 (2005) 2879-2884
12. Nik Norulaini N.A., Zuhairi A.A., Muhamad Hakimi I., and Mohd Omar A.K. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) using attached-film bioreactor: trickling filter as a case study. J Ind Technol 10 (2001) 41-54
13. Fakhrul-Razi A., and Noor M.J.M.M. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) with the membrane anaerobic system (MAS). Water Sci Tech 39 (1999) 159-163
14. Borja R., Banks C.J., and Sanchez E. Anaerobic treatment of palm oil mill effluent in a two-stage up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) system. J Biotechnol 45 (1996) 125-135
15. Borja R., and Banks C. Anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent using an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Biomass Bioenergy 6 (1994) 381-389
16. Baş D., and Boyaci I.H. Modeling and optimization I{cyrillic, ukrainian}: usability of response surface methodology. J Food Engineering 78 3 (2007) 836-845
17. Box G.E.P., and Draper N.R. Empirical model-building and response surfaces (1987), John Wiley & Sons, New York
18. Zinatizadeh A.A.L., Mohamed A.R., Abdullah A.Z., Mashitah M.D., Isa M.H., and Najafpour G.D. Process modeling and analysis of palm oil mill effluent treatment in an up-flow anaerobic sludge fixed film bioreactor using response surface methodology (RSM). Water Res 40 17 (2006) 3193-3208
19. Isa M.H., Farooq I.H., and Siddiqi R.H. Methanogenic activity test for study of anaerobic processes. Indian J Environ Health 35 1 (1993) 1-8
20. Kuehl R.O. Design of experiments: statistical principles of research design and analysis. 2nd ed. (2000), Duxbury Press, CA p. 2-225
21. Khuri A.I., and Cornell J.A. Response surfaces: design and analyses. 2nd ed. (1996), Marcel Dekker, New York
22. American Public Health Association (APHA). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. (1999), APHA, Washington, DC
23. Zinatizadeh A.A.L., Mohamed A.R., Abdullah A.Z., Mashitah M.D., and Isa M.H. Characteristics of granular sludge developed in an up-flow anaerobic sludge fixed film bioreactor treating palm oil mill effluent. Water Environ Res 79 (2007)
24. Zinatizadeh A.A.L., Mohamed A.R., Najafpour G.D., Isa M.H., and Nasrollahzadeh H. Kinetic evaluation of palm oil mill effluent digestion in a high-rate up-flow sludge-fixed film bioreactor. Process Biochem 41 (2006) 1038-1046