Evolving roles of online and face-to-face instructors in a lecture/lab hybrid course

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 5-17

  Beck, Dennis ^a   Ferdig, Richard E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956236422     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Angeli, C, Bonk, CJ and Hara, N (1998) Content analysis of online discussion in applied educational psychology course, CRLT, Technical Report No. 2-98.
2. Ascough, R.S. (2002). Designing for online distance education: Putting pedagogy before technology. Teaching theology and religion, 5(1), 17-29. Retrieved October 4, 2003, from EBSCOhost database.
3. Barnett L, Brunner D, Maier P, and Warren A (1996) Technology in Teaching and Learning, a guide for academics. University of Southampton, UK: Greentree Press.
4. Beichner, R.J., and Saul, J.M., 2003, Introduction to the SCALE-UP (student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs) project. Proceedings of the International School of Physics, Varenna, Italy, July 2003, Available at http://www.physics.ncsu.edu:8380/physics_ed/Articles/Varenna_SCALEUP_Paper.pdf (26 August, 2004).
5. Bodner, G.M. (1991, April). Teaching critical thinking through problem solving. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Chemical Society, Chemistry Education Division, Atlanta, GA.
6. Bonk, CJ and Wisher, RA (2000) Applying collaborative and e-learning tools to military distance learning: A research framework, (Technical Report #1107), US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Alexandria, VA.
7. Bruce, B.C., Dowd, H., Eastburn, D.M., D'arcy, C.J. (2005). Plants, Pathogens, and People: Extending the Classroom to the Web. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1730-1753
8. Brush T A (1998) Embedding co-operative learning into the design of integrated learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46, 5-18.
9. Burke, K. A., Greenbowe, T. J., Gelder, J. I. (2004). The Multi-Initiative Dissemination Project Workshops: Who Attends Them and How Effective Are They? Journal of Chemical Education, 81(6), 897-902
10. Carter, C.S. (1988, April). Contexts of classroom chemistry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Lake of the Ozarks, MO.
11. Chen, C. S. (2002). Self-regulated learning strategies and achievement in an introduction to information systems course. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 20(1), 11-25
12. DiBiase, W. J., Wagner, E. P. (2002). Aligning general chemistry laboratory with lecture at a large university. School Science and Mathematics, 102(4), 158-171
13. Dougiamas, M. and Taylor, P.C. (2003) Moodle: Using Learning Communities to Create an Open Source Course Management System. Proceedings of the EDMEDIA 2003 Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.
14. Dringus, L. P. (Winter 2000). Towards active online learning: A dramatic shift in perspective for learners. Internet and Higher Education, 2(4), 189-95.
15. Gabel, D. (1987). Problem solving chemistry. NARST Research Matters, Occasional Publications To the Science Teacher, 1-2.
16. Gibbs, G. (1992a). Control and independence. In G. Gibbs and A. Jenkins (Eds.), Teaching large classes in higher education (pp. 37-62). London: Kogan Page.
17. Gibbs, G. (1992b). Improving the quality of student learning through course design. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Learning to effect (pp. 149-165). Buckingham, Great Britain: Open University Press.
18. Gibbs G (1992c) Improving the Quality of Student Leaning. Bristol, UK: Technical and Educational Services. Green M (1995) Transforming British higher education: A view from across the Atlantic. Higher Education, 29, 225-239.
19. Gueldenzoph, L. (2003). The Integration of Constructivist Theory and Socialization to Distance (Online) Learning. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal. 45(3).
20. Hatch, T., Bass, R., Iiyoshi, T., Mace, D. P. (2004). Building knowledge for teaching and learning: the promise of scholarship in a networked environment. Change, 36(5), 42-49
21. Knowlton, D. S. (2000). A theoretical framework for the online classroom: A defense and delineation of a student-centered pedagogy. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 84, 5-14.
22. Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In W. Labov (Ed.), Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
23. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Lippert, S. K., & Granger, M. J. (1988). Tired of teaching software applications? (ERIC Document Service Reproduction No. ED431415).
25. Maheshwari, P. (1997). Improving the Learning Environment in First-Year Programming: Integrating Lectures, Tutorials, and Laboratories. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science, 16(1), 111-131
26. Mathison, S (1988) Why triangulate?, Educational Researcher, 13-17.
27. Maor, D. (2003). The teacher's role in developing interaction and reflection in an online learning community. Computer Mediated Communication. 40(1).
28. McKeachie, W. J. (1988). The need for study strategy training. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P.A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation. (pp. 3-9). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29. Muirhead, W.D. (2000). Online education in school [Electronic version]. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(7), 315-324.
30. Norton L S and Crowley C M (1995) Can students be helped to learn how to learn? an evaluation of an Approaches to Learning programme for first year degree students. Higher Education, 29, 307-328.
31. O'Hagan C (1997) SEDA Special 4: Using Educational Media to Improve Communication and Learning Birmingham, UK: SEDA
32. Perkins, D. (2005). The Case for a Cooperative Studio Classroom: Teaching Petrology in a Different Way. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(1), 101-109
33. Ramsden P (1996) Learning to teach in Higher Education. London, UK. Routledge.
34. Salomon, G., Gardner, H. (1986). The computer as educator: lessons from television research. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 13-19.
35. Sneddon, J., Settle, C., Triggs, G. (2001). The effects of multimedia delivery and continual assessment on student academic performance on a level 1 undergraduate plant science module. Journal of Biological Education 36(1), 6-10.
36. Springer L, Donovan S S, and Stanne M E (1999) Effects of small group learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology. A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21-51.
37. Swan, K. (2003). Learning effectiveness online: what the research tells us. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds) Elements Quality Online Education, Practice and Direction. Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education, 13-45.
38. Swift, J.N., Gooding, C.T., & Swift, P.R. (1989). Using research to improve the quality of classroom discussions. NARST Research Matters, Occasional Publications to the Science Teacher, No. 20.
39. Van Dusen G C (1998) The Virtual Campus: Technology and Refonn inHigher Education. Washington University. Washington DC, USA: ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.
40. Vonderwell, S. & Turner, S. (2005). Active Learning and Preservice Teachers' Experiences in an Online Course: A Case Study. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 13(1), 65-84
41. Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, (3rd Ed., pp. 315-327). New York: MacMillan.
42. Forms of activity and interpersonal relations. (2006, August 28). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 19:03, April 25, 2007, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Forms_of_activity_and_interpersonal_relations&oldid=72438765
43. Yang, Y. & Cornelious, L. F. (2004). Ensuring quality in online education instruction: what instructors should know? In Association for Educational Communications and Technology Conference proceedings, Chicago, IL, Oct 19-23, 2004, 847-860.
44. Zheng, L. & Smaldino, S. (2003). Key instructional design elements for distance education. The Quarterly Reviewof Distance Education, 4(2), 153-166. Retrieved October 4, 2003, from EBSCOhost database.
45. Zoller, U. (1991). Teaching/learning styles, performance, and students' teaching evaluation in S/T/E/S-focused science education: A quasi-quantitative probe of a case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 593-607.
46. Zoller, U. (1991a). Problem-solving and the 'problem-solving paradox.' In Keiny, S., & U. Zoller (Eds.), Conceptual issues in environmental education (pp. 71-87). New York: Peter Lang.
47. Zoller, U. (1999). Scaling-up of higher order cognitive skills-oriented college chemistry teaching: An actionoriented research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 583-596.