Dynamic Contour Tonometry (DCT) over a thin daily disposable hydrogel contact lens

Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 219-224

  Nosch, Daniela Sonja ^a   Duddek, Armin P ^b   Herrmann, Didier ^b   Stuhrmann, Oliver M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES AND ARTS NORTHWESTERN SWITZERLAND   (Switzerland)

^b Prolens AG   (Switzerland)

^c Ophthalmology Clinic Pallas   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Contact lens; Cornea; Dynamic Contour Tonometry; Hydrogel; Intraocular pressure; Ocular pulse amplitude

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CURVATURE; CORNEA THICKNESS; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RIGIDITY; TONOMETER; TONOMETRY;

ADULT; AGED; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; EYE; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PULSE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77956227935     PISSN: 13670484     EISSN: 14765411     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2010.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Goldmann H., Schmidt T. Applanation tonometry. Ophthalmologica 1957 Oct, 134(4):221-242.
2. Sudesh S., Moseley M.J., Thompson J.R. Accuracy of Goldmann tonometry in clinical practice. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1993 Apr, 71(2):185-188.
3. Ehlers N., Bramsen T., Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1975 Mar, 53(1):34-43.
4. Mark H.H. Corneal curvature in applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1973 Aug, 76(2):223-224.
5. Argus W.A. Ocular hypertension and central corneal thickness. Ophthalmology 1995 Dec, 102(12):1810-1812.
6. Whitacre M.M., Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993 Jul-Aug, 38(1):1-30.
7. Boehm A.G., Weber A., Pillunat L.E., Koch R., Spoerl E. Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008 Jun, 49(6):2472-2477.
8. Lim L., Ng T.P., Tan D.T. Accurate intraocular pressure measurement in contact lens wearers with normal pressures. CLAO J 1997 Apr, 23(2):130-133.
9. Allen R.J., Dev Borman A., Saleh G.M. Applanation tonometry in silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007 Dec, 30(5):267-269.
10. Zeri F., Lupelli L., Formichella P., Masci C., Fletcher R. Goldmann applanation tonometry over daily disposable contact lens: accuracy and safety of procedure. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007 Sep, 30(4):233-238. quiz, 60-1.
11. McMonnies C.W. Noncontact tonometry through soft contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986 Dec, 63(12):948-951.
12. Insler M.S., Robbins R.G. Intraocular pressure by noncontact tonometry with and without soft contact lenses. Arch Ophthalmol 1987 Oct, 105(10):1358-1359.
13. Sugimoto-Takeuchi R., Yamamoto R., Kuwayama Y., Kinoshita S. Effect of intraocular pressure measurement through therapeutic soft contact lenses by noncontact tonometer. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 1991 Sep, 95(9):869-872.
14. Schollmayer P., Hawlina M. Effect of soft contact lenses on the measurements of intraocular pressure with non-contact pneumotonometry. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2003 Dec, 220(12):840-842.
15. Panek W.C., Boothe W.A., Lee D.A., Zemplenyi E., Pettit T.H. Intraocular pressure measurement with the Tono-Pen through soft contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 1990 Jan, 109(1):62-65.
16. Bandlitz S., Berke A. Ocular response analyzer for non-contact-tonometrie over silicone-hydrogel-contact lenses 2007, Poster BCLA.
17. Touboul J. IOP measurement through frequent-replacement soft contact lenses. J Fr Ophtalmol 2008 Jul, 31(6 Pt 2). 2S29-33.
18. Schmidt K.G., von Ruckmann A., Pillunat L.E. Topical carbonic anhydrase inhibition increases ocular pulse amplitude in high tension primary open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1998 Jul, 82(7):758-762.
19. Hoffmann E.M., Grus F.H., Pfeiffer N. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry. BMC Ophthalmol 2004, 4:4.
20. Schwenn O., Troost R., Vogel A., Grus F., Beck S., Pfeiffer N. Ocular pulse amplitude in patients with open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma, and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 2002 Sep, 86(9):981-984.
21. Zhang M.Z., Fu Z.F., Liu X.R., Zheng C. A comparison study of pulsitile ocular blood flow in normal eyes and primary open angle glaucoma. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2004 Apr, 40(4):250-253.
22. Cioffi G.A., Alm A. Measurement of ocular blood flow. J Glaucoma 2001 Oct, 10(5 Suppl. 1):S62-S64.
23. Fontana L., Poinoosawmy D., Bunce C.V., O'Brien C., Hitchings R.A. Pulsatile ocular blood flow investigation in asymmetric normal tension glaucoma and normal subjects. Br J Ophthalmol 1998 Jul, 82(7):731-736.
24. Mittag T.W., Serle J., Schumer R., Brodie S., Stegman D., Schmidt K.G., Taniguchi T., Rho S.H., Podos S. Studies of the ocular pulse in primates. Surv Ophthalmol 1994 May, 38(Suppl.):S183-S190.
25. Schmidt K.G., von Ruckmann A., Becker R., Pillunat L.E. Ocular pulse amplitude, intraocular pressure and beta blocker/carbonic anhydrase inhibition in combined therapy of primary open-angle glaucoma. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1999 Dec, 215(6):361-366.
26. Tielsch J.M., Katz J., Sommer A., Quigley H.A., Javitt J.C. Hypertension, perfusion pressure, and primary open-angle glaucoma. A population-based assessment. Arch Ophthalmol 1995 Feb, 113(2):216-221.
27. Kaufmann C., Bachmann L.M., Thiel M.A. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004 Sep, 45(9):3118-3121.
28. Pache M., Wilmsmeyer S., Lautebach S., Funk J. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005 Aug, 243(8):763-767.
29. Herdener S., Pache M., Lautebach S., Funk J. Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT)-a comparison of agreement and reproducibility. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007 Jul, 245(7):1027-1030.
30. Detry-Morel M., Jamart J., Detry M.B., Ledoux A., Pourjavan S. Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer. J Fr Ophtalmol 2007 Mar, 30(3):260-270.
31. Pourjavan S., Boelle P.Y., Detry-Morel M., De Potter P. Physiological diurnal variability and characteristics of the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) with the dynamic contour tonometer (DCT-Pascal). Int Ophthalmol 2007 Dec, 27(6):357-360.
32. Heras-Mulero H., Moreno-Montanes J., Sadaba Echarri L.M., Mendiluce Martin L. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry (Pascal) with pneumotonometry and Goldmann tonometry. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2007 Jun, 82(6):337-341.
33. Motolko M.A., Feldman F., Hyde M., Hudy D. Sources of variability in the results of applanation tonometry. Can J Ophthalmol 1982 Jun, 17(3):93-95.
34. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992 Jul, 112(1):155-159.
35. Venables W.N., Ripley B.D. Modern applied statistics with S 2002, Springer. fourth edition.
36. Krieglstein G.K., Waller W.K., Reimers H., Langham M.E. Intraocular pressure measurements on soft contact lenses. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 1976 May, 199(3):223-229.
37. Rubenstein J.B., Deutsch T.A. Pneumatonometry through bandage contact lenses. Arch Ophthalmol 1985 Nov, 103(11):1660-1661.
38. Scibilia G.D., Ehlers W.H., Donshik P.C. The effects of therapeutic contact lenses on intraocular pressure measurement. CLAO J 1996 Oct, 22(4):262-265.