LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy: A prospective, randomized clinical trial

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 53, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1161-1167

  Sakr, Mahmoud F ^a   Moussa, Mohamed M ^b  

^a ALEXANDRIA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^b Ahmadi Hospital   (Kuwait)

Author keywords

Hemorrhoids; LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy; Prolapse; Recurrence; Stapled hemorrhoidopexy

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; ANUS SURGERY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEMORRHOID; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STAPLED HEMORRHOIDOPEXY; STAPLER; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOLLOW UP; INSTRUMENTATION; LIGATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SUTURE; SUTURING METHOD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR SURGERY;

ADULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; LIGATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECURRENCE; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; SUTURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 77956220857     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e1a1e9     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities: A meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38: 687-694.
2. Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tan M, Leong AF. Randomized controlled trial of open and closed haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1729-1730.
3. Arbman G, Krook H, Haapaniemi S. Closed vs. open hemorrhoidectomy: is there any difference? Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43:31-34.
4. Gencosmanoglu R, Sad O, Koc D, Inceoglu R. Hemorrhoidectomy: Open or closed technique? A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:70-75.
5. Chung YC,WuHJ. Clinical experience of sutureless closed hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:87-92.
6. Pattana-arun J, Sooriprasoet N, Sahakijrungruang C, Tantiphlachiva K, Rojanasakul A. Closed vs ligasure hemorrhoidectomy: A prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006; 89:453-458.
7. Nienhuijs S, de Hingh I. Conventional versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;January 21:CD006761.
8. Gravie JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy: A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up. Ann Surg. 2005;242:29-35.
9. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: A new procedure. Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, June 3-6, 1998, Rome, Italy. Bologna: Monduzzi, 1998:777-784.
10. Cepeda MS, Africano JM, Polo R, Alcala R, Carr DB. What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? Pain. 2003;105:151-157.
11. Wang JY, Tsai HL, Chen FM, et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of Starion vs Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1146-1151.
12. Franklin EJ, Seetharam S, Lowney J, Horgan PG. Randomized, clinical trial of Ligasure vs conventional diathermy in hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1380-1383.
13. Muzi MG, Milito G, Nigro C, et al. Randomized clinical trial of LigaSure and conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2007;94:937-942.
14. Palazzo FF, Francis DL, Clifton MA. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2002;89: 154-157.
15. Jayne DG, Botterill I, Ambrose NS, et al. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus conventional diathermy for day-case haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2002;89:428-432.
16. Thorbeck CV, Montes MF. Haemorrhoidectomy: Randomised controlled clinical trial of Ligasure compared with Milligan- Morgan operation. Eur J Surg. 2002;168:482-484.
17. Sakr MF. LigaSure versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Tech Coloproctol. 2010; 14:13-17.
18. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2001;88:669-674.
19. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: Randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;355:782-785.
20. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: Randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000; 355:779-781.
21. HoYH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: Cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1666-1675.
22. Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2001;88: 1049-1053.
23. Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M, et al. Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse.AmJ Surg. 2001;182:64-68.
24. Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, Fearn SJ, Brough WA. Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: A randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:1437-1444.
25. Pavlidis T, Papaziogas B, Souparis A, et al. Modern stapled Longo procedure vs. conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2002;17:50-53.
26. Ceci F, Picchio M, Palimento D, et al. Long-term outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1107-1112.
27. Huang WS, Chin CC, Yeh CH, Lin PY, Wang JY. Randomized comparison between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids in Taiwan: A prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:955-961.
28. Tan KY, Zin T, Sim HL, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy with open diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Tech Coloproctol. 2008;12:93-97.
29. Ramcharan KS, Hunt TM. Anal stenosis after LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1670-1671.
30. Kraemer M, Parulava T, Roblick M, Duschka L, Muller-Lobeck H. Prospective, randomized study: proximate PPH stapler vs. LigaSure for hemorrhoidal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48: 1517-1522.
31. Basdanis G, Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, Apostolidis S, Harlaftis N. Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs open with Ligasure for prolapsed piles. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:235-239.
32. Chen S, Lai DM, Yang B, et al. Therapeutic comparison between procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and Ligasure technique for hemorrhoids [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007;10:342-345.
33. Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, et al. Prospective study of factors affecting postoperative pain and symptom persistence after stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids: A need for preservation of squamous epithelium. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46:955-962.
34. Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW. Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg. 2006;93:226-230.
35. Bikhchandani J, Agarwal PN, Kant R, Malik VK. Randomized controlled trial to compare the early and mid-term results of stapled versus open hemorrhoidectomy. Am J Surg. 2005;189: 56-60.
36. Peng BC, Jayne DG, Ho YH. Randomized trial of rubber band ligation vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed piles. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:291-297.
37. Kirsch JJ, Staude G, Herold A. The Longo and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: A prospective comparative study of 300 patients [in German]. Chirurg. 2001;72:180-185.
38. Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I. Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: A randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:93-99.
39. Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, Wang J, Zhang L. The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: A systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006;21:172-178.
40. Kanellos I, Zacharakis E, Kanellos D, et al. Long-term results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy for third-degree haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol. 2006;10:47-49.
41. Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R, Ovens L, Nastro P. Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg. 2009;144:266-272.