Prospective study of factors affecting postoperative pain and symptom persistence after stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids: A need for preservation of squamous epithelium

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 955-962

  Correa Rovelo, José M ^a,c   Tellez, Oscar ^a   Obregón, Leoncio ^a   Duque López, Ximena ^a   Miranda Gómez, Adriana ^a   Pichardo Bahena, Raúl ^a   Mendez, Manuel ^a   Moran, Segundo ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTO MEXICANO DEL SEGURO SOCIAL   (Mexico)

^b LIVER RESEARCH UNIT   (Mexico)

^c Puente de Piedra   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Hemorrhoidal disease; Hemorrhoids; Stapled hemorrhoidectomy; Stapled rectal mucosectomy

Indexed keywords

KETOROLAC; POLYGLACTIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLUMNAR EPITHELIUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FOLLOW UP; HEMORRHOID; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RECTAL MUCOSECTOMY; RECTUM MUCOSA; RECTUM SURGERY; SMOOTH MUSCLE FIBER; SQUAMOUS EPITHELIUM; SURGICAL STAPLING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTUM; SURGICAL STAPLING;

EID: 0038115126     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6693-z     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoid disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Rome: Mundozzi Editore 1998;777-84.
2. Thomson WH. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975;62:542-52.
3. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised control trial. Lancet 2000;355: 782-85.
4. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomized control trial. Lancet 2000;355:779-81.
5. Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy - cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43: 1666-75.
6. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88:669-74.
7. Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M, et al. Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. Am J Surg 2001;182:64-8.
8. Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:1049-53.
9. Correa-Rovelo JM, Téllez O, Obregón L, Miranda-Gomez A, Moran S. Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1367-75.
10. Ooi Bs, Ho YH, Tang CI, et al. Results of stapling and conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Tech Coloproctol 2002;6:59-62.
11. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RK. Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000;356:730-3.
12. George B, Shetty D, Lindsey I, Mortensen N, Warren B. Histopathology of stapled hemorrhoidectomy specimens: a cautionary note [meeting abstract]. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:A41.
13. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D. Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy [letter]. Lancet 2000; 355:810.
14. Rippetti V, Caricato M, Arullani A. Rectal perforation, retropneumoperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids: report of a case and subsequent considerations. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45;268-70.
15. Practice parameters for the treatment of hemorrhoids. The Standards Task Force American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:1118-20.
16. Arnaud JP, Pessaux P, Huten N, et al. Treatment of hemorrhoids with circular stapler, a new alternative to conventional methods: a prospective study of 140 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2001;193:161-5.
17. Beattie GC, Loudon MA. Follow-up confirms sustained benefit of circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of prolapsing haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 2001; 88:850-2.
18. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Sallustio PL, et al. Long-term effects of stapled haemorrhoidectomy on internal anal function and sensitivity. Br J Surg 2001;88:1487-91.
19. Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V, et al. Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 2002;6:83-8.
20. Fenger C. Histology of the anal canal. Am J Surg Pathol 1988;12:41-55.
21. Duthie HL, Gairns FW. Sensory nerve-endings and sensation in the anal region of man. Br J Surg 1960;47:585-95.
22. Walls EW. Recent observations on the anatomy of the anal canal. Proc R Soc Med 1959;52(Suppl):85-7.
23. Thompson-Fawcett MW, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ. A new look at the anal transitional zone with reference to restorative proctocolectomy and the columnar cuff. Br J Surg 1998;85:1517-21.
24. Jongen JH, Bock JU. Pain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy [letter]. Lancet 2000;356:2187.
25. Cheetham MJ, Phillips KS. Pain after stapled haemohrroidectomy [letter]. Lancet 2000;356:2190.
26. Pernice LM, Bartalucci B, Bencini L, Borri A, Catarzi S, Kroning K. Early and late (ten years) experience with circular stapler hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:836-41.