|
Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 93-97
|
Randomized clinical trial comparing LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy with open diathermy haemorrhoidectomy
|
Author keywords
Haemorrhoidectomy; LigaSure; Pain; Wound healing
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
BLEEDING;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DEVICE;
DIATHERMY;
EPITHELIZATION;
FEMALE;
HEMORRHOID;
HEMORRHOID HEMORRHAGE;
HEMORRHOIDECTOMY;
HUMAN;
HUMAN TISSUE;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LIGASURE HEMORRHOIDECTOMY;
MALE;
MILLIGAN MORGAN EXCISION HEMORRHOIDECTOMY;
OPEN DIATHERMY HEMORRHOIDECTOMY;
OPERATION DURATION;
POSTOPERATIVE CARE;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE;
POSTOPERATIVE PAIN;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
PRURITUS;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
URINE RETENTION;
VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;
WOUND HEALING;
ADULT;
AGED;
CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION;
DIATHERMY;
FEMALE;
HEMORRHOIDS;
HUMANS;
LIGATION;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PAIN MEASUREMENT;
PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE;
POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
WOUND HEALING;
|
EID: 48349119183
PISSN: 11236337
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-008-0405-y Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (27)
|
References (9)
|