Gene set-based module discovery decodes cis- regulatory codes governing diverse gene expression across human multiple tissues

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2010, Pages

  Niida, Atsushi ^a   Imoto, Seiya ^a   Yamaguchi, Rui ^a   Nagasaki, Masao ^a   Miyano, Satoru ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CIS ACTING ELEMENT;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; ALGORITHM; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENETICS; REGULATORY SEQUENCE;

ALGORITHMS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; REGULATORY SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID;

EID: 77956208558     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010910     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Su A, Wiltshire T, Batalov S, Lapp H, Ching K, et al. (2004) A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 6062-7.
2. Smith A, Sumazin P, Xuan Z, Zhang M (2006) DNA motifs in human and mouse proximal promoters predict tissue-specific expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 6275-80.
3. Smith A, Sumazin P, Zhang M (2007) Tissue-specific regulatory elements in mammalian promoters. Mol Syst Biol 3: 73.
4. Kim S, Kim Y (2006) Genome-wide prediction of transcriptional regulatory elements of human promoters using gene expression and promoter analysis data. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 330.
5. Pennacchio L, Loots G, Nobrega M, Ovcharenko I (2007) Predicting tissuespecific enhancers in the human genome. Genome Res 17: 201-11.
6. Niida A, Smith A, Imoto S, Aburatani H, Zhang M, et al. (2009) Gene set-based module discovery in the breast cancer transcriptome. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 71.
7. Niida A, Imoto S, Nagasaki M, Yamaguchi R, Miyano S (2009) A novel metaanalysis approach of cancer transcriptomes reveals prevailing transcriptional networks in cancer cells. Genome Informatics 22: 121-131.
8. Cheng Y, Church G (2000) Biclustering of expression data. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 8: 93-103.
9. Tanay A, Sharan R, Shamir R (2002) Discovering statistically significant biclusters in gene expression data. Bioinformatics 18 Suppl 1: S136-44.
10. Bergmann S, Ihmels J, Barkai N (2003) Iterative signature algorithm for the analysis of large-scale gene expression data. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 67: 031902.
11. Prelic A, Bleuler S, Zimmermann P, Wille A, Bühlmann P, et al. (2006) A systematic comparison and evaluation of biclustering methods for gene expression data. Bioinformatics 22: 1122-9.
12. Segal E, Friedman N, Koller D, Regev A (2004) A module map showing conditional activity of expression modules in cancer. Nat Genet 36: 1090-8.
13. Miller L, Smeds J, George J, Vega V, Vergara L, et al. (2005) An expression signature for p53 status in human breast cancer predicts mutation status, transcriptional effects, and patient survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 13550-5.
14. Matys V, Kel-Margoulis O, Fricke E, Liebich I, Land S, et al. (2006) Transfac and its module transcompel: transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D108-10.
15. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha V, Mukherjee S, Ebert B, et al. (2005) Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 15278-9.
16. Jakt L, Cao L, Cheah K, Smith D (2001) Assessing clusters and motifs from gene expression data. Genome Res 11: 112-23.
17. Fisher RS (1932) Statistical methods for research workers. London: Oliver and Boyd.
18. Brown M (1975) A method for combining non-independent, one-sided tests of significance. Biometrics 31: 987-992.
19. Rivals I, Personnaz L, Taing L, Potier M (2007) Enrichment or depletion of a go category within a class of genes: which test? Bioinformatics 23: 401-7.