Aquatic multi-species acute toxicity of (chlorinated) anilines: Experimental versus predicted data

Chemosphere

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 177-186

  Dom, Nathalie ^a   Knapen, Dries ^a   Benoot, Donald ^a   Nobels, Ingrid ^a   Blust, Ronny ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Acute toxicity; Chlorinated anilines; ECOSAR; Escherichia coli growth inhibition; Multi species; Species sensitivity distributions

Indexed keywords

ANILINE; CHEMICAL HAZARDS; COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FORECASTING; MOLECULAR GRAPHICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY;

ACUTE TOXICITY; ECOSAR; ESCHERICHIA COLI GROWTHS; MULTI SPECIES; SPECIES SENSITIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

POPULATION DISTRIBUTION;

2,3,4 TRICHLOROANILINE; 3,5 DICHLOROANILINE; 4 CHLOROANILINE; ANILINE; ANILINE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; 3,5-DICHLOROANILINE; 4-CHLOROANILINE; WATER POLLUTANT;

ALGA; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; AROMATIC HYDROCARBON; COLIFORM BACTERIUM; CRUSTACEAN; CYPRINID; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GROWTH RESPONSE; INHIBITION; ORGANOCHLORINE; POLLUTION EFFECT; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY TEST;

ACUTE TOXICITY; AQUATIC SPECIES; ARTICLE; DAPHNIA; ECOTOXICITY; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PSEUDOKIRCHNERIELLA SUBCAPITATA; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TOXICITY TESTING; WATER POLLUTANT; ZEBRA FISH; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG EFFECTS; FORECASTING; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYSIOLOGY; TOXICITY;

ANILINE COMPOUNDS; ANIMALS; DAPHNIA; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FORECASTING; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TOXICITY TESTS, ACUTE; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; ZEBRAFISH;

EID: 77956189210     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.06.059     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abe T., Saito H., Niikura Y., Shigeoka T., Nakano Y. Embryonic development assay with Daphnia magna: application to toxicity of aniline derivates. Chemosphere 2001, 45:487-495.
2. Ahlers J., Riedhammer C., Vogliano M., Ebert R.U., Kühne R., Schüürmann G. Acute to chronic ratios in aquatic toxicity - variation across tropic levels and relationship with chemical structure. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2006, 25:2937-2945.
3. Boehncke A., Kielhorn J., Könnecker G., Pohlenz-Michel C., Mangelsdorf I. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 48 - 4-Chloroaniline 2003, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
4. Boghal N., Grindon C., Combes R., Balls M. Toxicity testing: creating a revolution based on new technologies. Trends Biotechnol. 2005, 23:299-307.
5. Breitzholtz M., Rudén C., Hansson S.O., Bengtsson B.E. Ten challenges for improved ecotoxicological testing in environmental risk assessment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2006, 63:324-335.
6. Chen C.Y., Ko C.W., Lee P.I. Toxicity of substituted anilines to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis for polar narcotics. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2007, 26:1158-1164.
7. Dardenne F., Nobels I., De Coen W., Blust R. Dose-response relationships and statistical performance of a battery of bacterial gene profiling assays. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 75(1):223-234.
8. Duboudin, C., 2003. Species Sensitivity Weighted Distribution Developed by Electricité de France with Institute de l'environnement industriel et des risques.
9. Duboudin C., Ciffroy P., Magaud H. Effects of data manipulation and statistical methods on species sensitivity distributions. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23:489-499.
10. European Chemicals Bureau (ECB), 2009. Toxtree Users Manual, Sofia, Bulgaria, Edition of 15th of July 2009. http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/qsar/qsar-tools/.
11. European Commission (EC), 1991. Annex VI to Directive 67/548/EEC, 1991. General Classification and Labelling Requirements for Dangerous Substances and Preparations. Official Journal of the European Communities No. L180/45, Brussels, Belgium, 9 July 1991.
12. Hall, J.A., Golding, L.A., 1998. Standard Methods for Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing: Development and Application. Report No. MFE80205. NIWA Report for the Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand.
13. Hamilton M.A., Russo R.C., Thurston R.V. Trimmed Spearman-Karber method for estimating lethal concentrations in toxicity bioassays. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1977, 11(7):714-719.
14. Kitagawa M., Wada C., Yoshioka S., Yura T. Expression of ClpB, an analog of the ATP-dependent protease regulatory subunit in Escherichia coli, is controlled by a heat-shock sigma-factor. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173:4247-4253.
15. Koivisto S. Is Daphnia magna an ecologically representative zooplankton species in toxicity tests?. Environ. Pollut. 1995, 90(2):263-267.
16. Mayo-Bean, K., Nabholz, J.V., Meylan, W.M., Howard, P.H., 2009. User's Guide for the ECOSAR Class Program Ver. 0.99 for Microsoft Windows, Risk Assessment Division, US EPA, Washington, USA and Syracuse Research Corporation, Syracuse, USA.
17. Moore D.R.J., Breton R.J., MacDonald D.B. A comparison of model performance for six quantitative structure-activity relationship packages that predict acute toxicity in fish. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2003, 22:1799-1809.
18. Marchini S., Hoglund M.D., Broderius S.J., Tosato M.L. Comparison of the susceptibility of daphnids and fish to benzene derivatives. Sci. Total Environ. 1993, 799-808.
19. Newman M.C., Ownby D.R., Mézin L.C.A., Powell D.C., Christensen T.R.L., Lerber S.C., Anderson B.A. Applying species-sensitivity distributions in ecological risk assessment: assumptions of distribution type and sufficient number of species. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2000, 10:508-515.
20. Öberg T. A QSAR for baseline toxicity: validation, domain of application and prediction. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2004, 17:1630-1637.
21. OECD, 1984a. OECD Guideline 201 for Testing of Chemicals, Alga, Growth Inhibition Test, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.
22. OECD, 1984b. OECD Guideline 202 for Testing of Chemicals, Daphnia, Acute Immobilisation Test and Reproduction Test Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.
23. OECD, 1992. OECD Guideline 203 for Testing of Chemicals, Fish Acute Toxicity Test Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.
24. OECD, 2000. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No 23; Guidance Document on Aquatic Toxicity Testing of Difficult Substances and Mixtures Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.
25. OECD, 2008. QSAR Application Toolbox Version 1.1: Getting Started, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France. http://www.oecd.org/env/existingchemicals/qsar.
26. Ramos E.U., Vaal M.A., Hermens J.L.M. Interspecies sensitivity in the aquatic toxicity of aromatic amines. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2002, 11:149-158.
27. Reuschenbach P., Silvani M., Dammann M., Warnecke D., Knacker T. ECOSAR model performance with a large test set of industrial chemicals. Chemosphere 2008, 71:1986-1995.
28. Ren S. Predicting three narcosis mechanisms of aquatic toxicity. Toxicol. Lett. 2002, 133:127-139.
29. Roex E.W.M., Van Gestel C.A.M., Van Wezel A.P., Van Straalen N.M. Ratios between acute toxicity and effects on population growth rates in relation to toxicant mode of action. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2000, 19:685-693.
30. Rojickova R., Dvorakova D., Marsalek B. The use of miniaturized algal bioassays in comparison to the standard flask assay. Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual. 1998, 13:235-241.
31. Schultz T.W., Lin D.T., Arnold M. QSARs for monosubstituted anilines eliciting the polar narcosis mechanism of action. Sci. Total Environ. 1991, 109/110:569-580.
32. Vaal M., van der Wal J.T., Hoekstra J., Hermens J. Variation in the sensitivity of aquatic species in relation to the classification of environmental pollutants. Chemosphere 1997, 35:1311-1327.
33. Vaal M., van der Wal J.T., Hermens J., Hoekstra J. Pattern analysis of the variation in sensitivity of aquatic species to toxicants. Chemosphere 1997, 35:1291-1309.
34. Verhaar H.J.M., van Leeuwen C.J., Hermens J.L.M. Classifying environmental pollutants: part 1. Structure activity relationships for prediction of aquatic toxicity. Chemosphere 1992, 25:471-491.
35. Verhaar H.J.M., Solbé J., Speksnijder J., Van Leeuwen C.J. Classifying environmental pollutants: part 3. External validation of the classification system. Chemosphere 2000, 40:873-883.
36. Von der Ohe P., Kühne R., Ebert R., Altenburger R., Liess M., Schüürmann G. Structural alerts - a new classification model to discriminate excess toxicity from narcotic effect levels of organic compounds in the acute daphnid assay. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2005, 18:536-555.
37. Vighi M., Migliorati S., Monti G.S. Toxicity on the luminescent bacterium Vibrio fisheri. I: QSAR equation for narcotics and polar narcotics. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2009, 72:154-161.
38. Wang B., Yu G., Huang J., Hu H. Development of species sensitivity distributions and estimation of HC5 of organochlorine pesticides with five statistical approaches. Ecotoxicology 2008, 17:716-724.
39. Wheeler J.R., Grist E.P.M., Leung K.M.Y., Morritt D., Crane M. Species sensitivity distribution: data and model choice. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2002, 45:192-202.
40. Yoshioka Y., Ose Y., Sato T. Testing for the toxicity of chemicals with Tetrahymena pyriformis. Sci. Total Environ. 1985, 43:149-157.